Cargando…

A prospective, randomized, double blind and placebo-control study comparing the additive effect of oral midazolam and clonidine for postoperative nausea and vomiting prophylaxis in granisetron premedicated patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystecomy

BACKGROUND: Reduction of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) continues to be a major challenge in perioperative care in spite of introduction of newer antiemetics with better efficacy and safety profiles. Therefore, we evaluated the additive effect of oral midazolam and clonidine for PONV proph...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yadav, Ghanshyam, Pratihary, Biranchi Narayan, Jain, Gaurav, Paswan, Anil Kumar, Mishra, Lal Dhar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3590545/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23493482
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-9185.105800
_version_ 1782261880150032384
author Yadav, Ghanshyam
Pratihary, Biranchi Narayan
Jain, Gaurav
Paswan, Anil Kumar
Mishra, Lal Dhar
author_facet Yadav, Ghanshyam
Pratihary, Biranchi Narayan
Jain, Gaurav
Paswan, Anil Kumar
Mishra, Lal Dhar
author_sort Yadav, Ghanshyam
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Reduction of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) continues to be a major challenge in perioperative care in spite of introduction of newer antiemetics with better efficacy and safety profiles. Therefore, we evaluated the additive effect of oral midazolam and clonidine for PONV prophylaxis in granisetron premedicated patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a prospective, randomized fashion, 120 selected cases were randomized into three groups: I, II or III to receive a tablet of midazolam (15 mg, n = 36), clonidine (150 mcg, n = 40), or glucose as placebo (5 g, n = 44) orally, 1 h before anesthesia. Occurrence of PONV along with need for rescue antiemetic during the first postoperative day was compared between groups as a primary outcome. RESULTS: Episodes of PONV reduced significantly in Group II (15%) as compared to group I and III (22.2%, 59%) at various time points during the period of observation (P = 0.002). Need for rescue antiemetic was significantly lower in group I (13.88%) and II (5%) as compared to group III (52.27%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Oral clonidine is better adjuvant for PONV prophylaxis, as compared to midazolam, in granisetron premedicated patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3590545
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35905452013-03-14 A prospective, randomized, double blind and placebo-control study comparing the additive effect of oral midazolam and clonidine for postoperative nausea and vomiting prophylaxis in granisetron premedicated patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystecomy Yadav, Ghanshyam Pratihary, Biranchi Narayan Jain, Gaurav Paswan, Anil Kumar Mishra, Lal Dhar J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol Original Article BACKGROUND: Reduction of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) continues to be a major challenge in perioperative care in spite of introduction of newer antiemetics with better efficacy and safety profiles. Therefore, we evaluated the additive effect of oral midazolam and clonidine for PONV prophylaxis in granisetron premedicated patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a prospective, randomized fashion, 120 selected cases were randomized into three groups: I, II or III to receive a tablet of midazolam (15 mg, n = 36), clonidine (150 mcg, n = 40), or glucose as placebo (5 g, n = 44) orally, 1 h before anesthesia. Occurrence of PONV along with need for rescue antiemetic during the first postoperative day was compared between groups as a primary outcome. RESULTS: Episodes of PONV reduced significantly in Group II (15%) as compared to group I and III (22.2%, 59%) at various time points during the period of observation (P = 0.002). Need for rescue antiemetic was significantly lower in group I (13.88%) and II (5%) as compared to group III (52.27%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Oral clonidine is better adjuvant for PONV prophylaxis, as compared to midazolam, in granisetron premedicated patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC3590545/ /pubmed/23493482 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-9185.105800 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Yadav, Ghanshyam
Pratihary, Biranchi Narayan
Jain, Gaurav
Paswan, Anil Kumar
Mishra, Lal Dhar
A prospective, randomized, double blind and placebo-control study comparing the additive effect of oral midazolam and clonidine for postoperative nausea and vomiting prophylaxis in granisetron premedicated patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystecomy
title A prospective, randomized, double blind and placebo-control study comparing the additive effect of oral midazolam and clonidine for postoperative nausea and vomiting prophylaxis in granisetron premedicated patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystecomy
title_full A prospective, randomized, double blind and placebo-control study comparing the additive effect of oral midazolam and clonidine for postoperative nausea and vomiting prophylaxis in granisetron premedicated patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystecomy
title_fullStr A prospective, randomized, double blind and placebo-control study comparing the additive effect of oral midazolam and clonidine for postoperative nausea and vomiting prophylaxis in granisetron premedicated patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystecomy
title_full_unstemmed A prospective, randomized, double blind and placebo-control study comparing the additive effect of oral midazolam and clonidine for postoperative nausea and vomiting prophylaxis in granisetron premedicated patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystecomy
title_short A prospective, randomized, double blind and placebo-control study comparing the additive effect of oral midazolam and clonidine for postoperative nausea and vomiting prophylaxis in granisetron premedicated patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystecomy
title_sort prospective, randomized, double blind and placebo-control study comparing the additive effect of oral midazolam and clonidine for postoperative nausea and vomiting prophylaxis in granisetron premedicated patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystecomy
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3590545/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23493482
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-9185.105800
work_keys_str_mv AT yadavghanshyam aprospectiverandomizeddoubleblindandplacebocontrolstudycomparingtheadditiveeffectoforalmidazolamandclonidineforpostoperativenauseaandvomitingprophylaxisingranisetronpremedicatedpatientsundergoinglaparoscopiccholecystecomy
AT pratiharybiranchinarayan aprospectiverandomizeddoubleblindandplacebocontrolstudycomparingtheadditiveeffectoforalmidazolamandclonidineforpostoperativenauseaandvomitingprophylaxisingranisetronpremedicatedpatientsundergoinglaparoscopiccholecystecomy
AT jaingaurav aprospectiverandomizeddoubleblindandplacebocontrolstudycomparingtheadditiveeffectoforalmidazolamandclonidineforpostoperativenauseaandvomitingprophylaxisingranisetronpremedicatedpatientsundergoinglaparoscopiccholecystecomy
AT paswananilkumar aprospectiverandomizeddoubleblindandplacebocontrolstudycomparingtheadditiveeffectoforalmidazolamandclonidineforpostoperativenauseaandvomitingprophylaxisingranisetronpremedicatedpatientsundergoinglaparoscopiccholecystecomy
AT mishralaldhar aprospectiverandomizeddoubleblindandplacebocontrolstudycomparingtheadditiveeffectoforalmidazolamandclonidineforpostoperativenauseaandvomitingprophylaxisingranisetronpremedicatedpatientsundergoinglaparoscopiccholecystecomy
AT yadavghanshyam prospectiverandomizeddoubleblindandplacebocontrolstudycomparingtheadditiveeffectoforalmidazolamandclonidineforpostoperativenauseaandvomitingprophylaxisingranisetronpremedicatedpatientsundergoinglaparoscopiccholecystecomy
AT pratiharybiranchinarayan prospectiverandomizeddoubleblindandplacebocontrolstudycomparingtheadditiveeffectoforalmidazolamandclonidineforpostoperativenauseaandvomitingprophylaxisingranisetronpremedicatedpatientsundergoinglaparoscopiccholecystecomy
AT jaingaurav prospectiverandomizeddoubleblindandplacebocontrolstudycomparingtheadditiveeffectoforalmidazolamandclonidineforpostoperativenauseaandvomitingprophylaxisingranisetronpremedicatedpatientsundergoinglaparoscopiccholecystecomy
AT paswananilkumar prospectiverandomizeddoubleblindandplacebocontrolstudycomparingtheadditiveeffectoforalmidazolamandclonidineforpostoperativenauseaandvomitingprophylaxisingranisetronpremedicatedpatientsundergoinglaparoscopiccholecystecomy
AT mishralaldhar prospectiverandomizeddoubleblindandplacebocontrolstudycomparingtheadditiveeffectoforalmidazolamandclonidineforpostoperativenauseaandvomitingprophylaxisingranisetronpremedicatedpatientsundergoinglaparoscopiccholecystecomy