Cargando…
A prospective, randomized, double blind and placebo-control study comparing the additive effect of oral midazolam and clonidine for postoperative nausea and vomiting prophylaxis in granisetron premedicated patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystecomy
BACKGROUND: Reduction of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) continues to be a major challenge in perioperative care in spite of introduction of newer antiemetics with better efficacy and safety profiles. Therefore, we evaluated the additive effect of oral midazolam and clonidine for PONV proph...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3590545/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23493482 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-9185.105800 |
_version_ | 1782261880150032384 |
---|---|
author | Yadav, Ghanshyam Pratihary, Biranchi Narayan Jain, Gaurav Paswan, Anil Kumar Mishra, Lal Dhar |
author_facet | Yadav, Ghanshyam Pratihary, Biranchi Narayan Jain, Gaurav Paswan, Anil Kumar Mishra, Lal Dhar |
author_sort | Yadav, Ghanshyam |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Reduction of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) continues to be a major challenge in perioperative care in spite of introduction of newer antiemetics with better efficacy and safety profiles. Therefore, we evaluated the additive effect of oral midazolam and clonidine for PONV prophylaxis in granisetron premedicated patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a prospective, randomized fashion, 120 selected cases were randomized into three groups: I, II or III to receive a tablet of midazolam (15 mg, n = 36), clonidine (150 mcg, n = 40), or glucose as placebo (5 g, n = 44) orally, 1 h before anesthesia. Occurrence of PONV along with need for rescue antiemetic during the first postoperative day was compared between groups as a primary outcome. RESULTS: Episodes of PONV reduced significantly in Group II (15%) as compared to group I and III (22.2%, 59%) at various time points during the period of observation (P = 0.002). Need for rescue antiemetic was significantly lower in group I (13.88%) and II (5%) as compared to group III (52.27%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Oral clonidine is better adjuvant for PONV prophylaxis, as compared to midazolam, in granisetron premedicated patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3590545 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35905452013-03-14 A prospective, randomized, double blind and placebo-control study comparing the additive effect of oral midazolam and clonidine for postoperative nausea and vomiting prophylaxis in granisetron premedicated patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystecomy Yadav, Ghanshyam Pratihary, Biranchi Narayan Jain, Gaurav Paswan, Anil Kumar Mishra, Lal Dhar J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol Original Article BACKGROUND: Reduction of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) continues to be a major challenge in perioperative care in spite of introduction of newer antiemetics with better efficacy and safety profiles. Therefore, we evaluated the additive effect of oral midazolam and clonidine for PONV prophylaxis in granisetron premedicated patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a prospective, randomized fashion, 120 selected cases were randomized into three groups: I, II or III to receive a tablet of midazolam (15 mg, n = 36), clonidine (150 mcg, n = 40), or glucose as placebo (5 g, n = 44) orally, 1 h before anesthesia. Occurrence of PONV along with need for rescue antiemetic during the first postoperative day was compared between groups as a primary outcome. RESULTS: Episodes of PONV reduced significantly in Group II (15%) as compared to group I and III (22.2%, 59%) at various time points during the period of observation (P = 0.002). Need for rescue antiemetic was significantly lower in group I (13.88%) and II (5%) as compared to group III (52.27%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Oral clonidine is better adjuvant for PONV prophylaxis, as compared to midazolam, in granisetron premedicated patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC3590545/ /pubmed/23493482 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-9185.105800 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Yadav, Ghanshyam Pratihary, Biranchi Narayan Jain, Gaurav Paswan, Anil Kumar Mishra, Lal Dhar A prospective, randomized, double blind and placebo-control study comparing the additive effect of oral midazolam and clonidine for postoperative nausea and vomiting prophylaxis in granisetron premedicated patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystecomy |
title | A prospective, randomized, double blind and placebo-control study comparing the additive effect of oral midazolam and clonidine for postoperative nausea and vomiting prophylaxis in granisetron premedicated patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystecomy |
title_full | A prospective, randomized, double blind and placebo-control study comparing the additive effect of oral midazolam and clonidine for postoperative nausea and vomiting prophylaxis in granisetron premedicated patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystecomy |
title_fullStr | A prospective, randomized, double blind and placebo-control study comparing the additive effect of oral midazolam and clonidine for postoperative nausea and vomiting prophylaxis in granisetron premedicated patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystecomy |
title_full_unstemmed | A prospective, randomized, double blind and placebo-control study comparing the additive effect of oral midazolam and clonidine for postoperative nausea and vomiting prophylaxis in granisetron premedicated patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystecomy |
title_short | A prospective, randomized, double blind and placebo-control study comparing the additive effect of oral midazolam and clonidine for postoperative nausea and vomiting prophylaxis in granisetron premedicated patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystecomy |
title_sort | prospective, randomized, double blind and placebo-control study comparing the additive effect of oral midazolam and clonidine for postoperative nausea and vomiting prophylaxis in granisetron premedicated patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystecomy |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3590545/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23493482 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-9185.105800 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yadavghanshyam aprospectiverandomizeddoubleblindandplacebocontrolstudycomparingtheadditiveeffectoforalmidazolamandclonidineforpostoperativenauseaandvomitingprophylaxisingranisetronpremedicatedpatientsundergoinglaparoscopiccholecystecomy AT pratiharybiranchinarayan aprospectiverandomizeddoubleblindandplacebocontrolstudycomparingtheadditiveeffectoforalmidazolamandclonidineforpostoperativenauseaandvomitingprophylaxisingranisetronpremedicatedpatientsundergoinglaparoscopiccholecystecomy AT jaingaurav aprospectiverandomizeddoubleblindandplacebocontrolstudycomparingtheadditiveeffectoforalmidazolamandclonidineforpostoperativenauseaandvomitingprophylaxisingranisetronpremedicatedpatientsundergoinglaparoscopiccholecystecomy AT paswananilkumar aprospectiverandomizeddoubleblindandplacebocontrolstudycomparingtheadditiveeffectoforalmidazolamandclonidineforpostoperativenauseaandvomitingprophylaxisingranisetronpremedicatedpatientsundergoinglaparoscopiccholecystecomy AT mishralaldhar aprospectiverandomizeddoubleblindandplacebocontrolstudycomparingtheadditiveeffectoforalmidazolamandclonidineforpostoperativenauseaandvomitingprophylaxisingranisetronpremedicatedpatientsundergoinglaparoscopiccholecystecomy AT yadavghanshyam prospectiverandomizeddoubleblindandplacebocontrolstudycomparingtheadditiveeffectoforalmidazolamandclonidineforpostoperativenauseaandvomitingprophylaxisingranisetronpremedicatedpatientsundergoinglaparoscopiccholecystecomy AT pratiharybiranchinarayan prospectiverandomizeddoubleblindandplacebocontrolstudycomparingtheadditiveeffectoforalmidazolamandclonidineforpostoperativenauseaandvomitingprophylaxisingranisetronpremedicatedpatientsundergoinglaparoscopiccholecystecomy AT jaingaurav prospectiverandomizeddoubleblindandplacebocontrolstudycomparingtheadditiveeffectoforalmidazolamandclonidineforpostoperativenauseaandvomitingprophylaxisingranisetronpremedicatedpatientsundergoinglaparoscopiccholecystecomy AT paswananilkumar prospectiverandomizeddoubleblindandplacebocontrolstudycomparingtheadditiveeffectoforalmidazolamandclonidineforpostoperativenauseaandvomitingprophylaxisingranisetronpremedicatedpatientsundergoinglaparoscopiccholecystecomy AT mishralaldhar prospectiverandomizeddoubleblindandplacebocontrolstudycomparingtheadditiveeffectoforalmidazolamandclonidineforpostoperativenauseaandvomitingprophylaxisingranisetronpremedicatedpatientsundergoinglaparoscopiccholecystecomy |