Cargando…

How Different Methodologies of Harvesting and Analysing the Samples Affect the Test Results in Determining Joint Mediators

Purpose. This study has researched the affect of different methodologies of harvesting and analysing the samples in determining the mediators emerging after the rat articular cartilage injury. Materials and Methods. One hundred and forty-four male wistar rats were divided into 2 groups. Synovial flu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yilmaz, Ibrahim, Gokay, Nevzat Selim, Bircan, Rifat, Saracoglu, Gamze V., Dervisoglu, Sergulen, Gokce, Alper
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3590575/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23509624
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/631959
_version_ 1782261887000379392
author Yilmaz, Ibrahim
Gokay, Nevzat Selim
Bircan, Rifat
Saracoglu, Gamze V.
Dervisoglu, Sergulen
Gokce, Alper
author_facet Yilmaz, Ibrahim
Gokay, Nevzat Selim
Bircan, Rifat
Saracoglu, Gamze V.
Dervisoglu, Sergulen
Gokce, Alper
author_sort Yilmaz, Ibrahim
collection PubMed
description Purpose. This study has researched the affect of different methodologies of harvesting and analysing the samples in determining the mediators emerging after the rat articular cartilage injury. Materials and Methods. One hundred and forty-four male wistar rats were divided into 2 groups. Synovial fluid samples were taken from all of the rats. We entered into the right knees of the rats in group I (n = 36) under anaesthesia and took cartilage tissue samples from their distal femur. Samples were taken as reference values for enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and histopathological evaluations. We entered into the right knees of the rats in group II (n = 108) and formed complete layer of cartilage injury in their medial femoral condyles. At the end of the 15th day, the rats were sacrificed after taking synovial fluid samples from their right knees creating defect in the rats in group II. The molecular markers in the synovial fluid and cartilage tissue samples which were taken from the experimental and control groups (MMP-9, MMP-13, TIMP-1, TNF-α, and NO) were analysed by direct or indirect methodologies. SPSS 18.0 Package program was used in the statistical evaluation. Students t-test where the measurement variables between the experimental and control groups were compared was applied. Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) curves were used in the determination of the diagnostic sufficiency from the tissue. Results. No difference was found between TIMP-1 (P = 0.67) and MMP-9 (P = 0.28) levels in synovial fluid and cartilage tissue. From the molecular markers, when MMP-9, MMP-13, NO, TIMP-1, TNF-α′, the area under ROC curve, and P values were examined, MMP-13 (P < 0.0001, 95% CI: 0.70–0.85), NO (P < 0.0001, 95% CI: 0.72–0.86), and TNF-α (P < 0.0001, 95% CI: 0.91–0.98) results were found to be statistically significant. Inferences. The indirect ELISA protocol which we apply for the cartilage tissue as an alternative to synovial lavage fluid is a reliable method which can be used in the determination of articular cartilage injury markers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3590575
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35905752013-03-18 How Different Methodologies of Harvesting and Analysing the Samples Affect the Test Results in Determining Joint Mediators Yilmaz, Ibrahim Gokay, Nevzat Selim Bircan, Rifat Saracoglu, Gamze V. Dervisoglu, Sergulen Gokce, Alper Arthritis Research Article Purpose. This study has researched the affect of different methodologies of harvesting and analysing the samples in determining the mediators emerging after the rat articular cartilage injury. Materials and Methods. One hundred and forty-four male wistar rats were divided into 2 groups. Synovial fluid samples were taken from all of the rats. We entered into the right knees of the rats in group I (n = 36) under anaesthesia and took cartilage tissue samples from their distal femur. Samples were taken as reference values for enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and histopathological evaluations. We entered into the right knees of the rats in group II (n = 108) and formed complete layer of cartilage injury in their medial femoral condyles. At the end of the 15th day, the rats were sacrificed after taking synovial fluid samples from their right knees creating defect in the rats in group II. The molecular markers in the synovial fluid and cartilage tissue samples which were taken from the experimental and control groups (MMP-9, MMP-13, TIMP-1, TNF-α, and NO) were analysed by direct or indirect methodologies. SPSS 18.0 Package program was used in the statistical evaluation. Students t-test where the measurement variables between the experimental and control groups were compared was applied. Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) curves were used in the determination of the diagnostic sufficiency from the tissue. Results. No difference was found between TIMP-1 (P = 0.67) and MMP-9 (P = 0.28) levels in synovial fluid and cartilage tissue. From the molecular markers, when MMP-9, MMP-13, NO, TIMP-1, TNF-α′, the area under ROC curve, and P values were examined, MMP-13 (P < 0.0001, 95% CI: 0.70–0.85), NO (P < 0.0001, 95% CI: 0.72–0.86), and TNF-α (P < 0.0001, 95% CI: 0.91–0.98) results were found to be statistically significant. Inferences. The indirect ELISA protocol which we apply for the cartilage tissue as an alternative to synovial lavage fluid is a reliable method which can be used in the determination of articular cartilage injury markers. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013 2013-02-20 /pmc/articles/PMC3590575/ /pubmed/23509624 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/631959 Text en Copyright © 2013 Ibrahim Yilmaz et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Yilmaz, Ibrahim
Gokay, Nevzat Selim
Bircan, Rifat
Saracoglu, Gamze V.
Dervisoglu, Sergulen
Gokce, Alper
How Different Methodologies of Harvesting and Analysing the Samples Affect the Test Results in Determining Joint Mediators
title How Different Methodologies of Harvesting and Analysing the Samples Affect the Test Results in Determining Joint Mediators
title_full How Different Methodologies of Harvesting and Analysing the Samples Affect the Test Results in Determining Joint Mediators
title_fullStr How Different Methodologies of Harvesting and Analysing the Samples Affect the Test Results in Determining Joint Mediators
title_full_unstemmed How Different Methodologies of Harvesting and Analysing the Samples Affect the Test Results in Determining Joint Mediators
title_short How Different Methodologies of Harvesting and Analysing the Samples Affect the Test Results in Determining Joint Mediators
title_sort how different methodologies of harvesting and analysing the samples affect the test results in determining joint mediators
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3590575/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23509624
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/631959
work_keys_str_mv AT yilmazibrahim howdifferentmethodologiesofharvestingandanalysingthesamplesaffectthetestresultsindeterminingjointmediators
AT gokaynevzatselim howdifferentmethodologiesofharvestingandanalysingthesamplesaffectthetestresultsindeterminingjointmediators
AT bircanrifat howdifferentmethodologiesofharvestingandanalysingthesamplesaffectthetestresultsindeterminingjointmediators
AT saracoglugamzev howdifferentmethodologiesofharvestingandanalysingthesamplesaffectthetestresultsindeterminingjointmediators
AT dervisoglusergulen howdifferentmethodologiesofharvestingandanalysingthesamplesaffectthetestresultsindeterminingjointmediators
AT gokcealper howdifferentmethodologiesofharvestingandanalysingthesamplesaffectthetestresultsindeterminingjointmediators