Cargando…

A CaRBS analysis of hip replacement approaches and non-pathology

This study investigates the differences in hip biomechanics for subjects following a total hip arthroplasty (THA), through the lateral approach (LA) and posterior approach (PA), to those with no pathology (NP). The principal component analysis was performed on two kinematic and two kinetic waveforms...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Whatling, G.M., Beynon, M.J., Holt, C.A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3590648/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22292467
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10255842.2011.613380
_version_ 1782261900282691584
author Whatling, G.M.
Beynon, M.J.
Holt, C.A.
author_facet Whatling, G.M.
Beynon, M.J.
Holt, C.A.
author_sort Whatling, G.M.
collection PubMed
description This study investigates the differences in hip biomechanics for subjects following a total hip arthroplasty (THA), through the lateral approach (LA) and posterior approach (PA), to those with no pathology (NP). The principal component analysis was performed on two kinematic and two kinetic waveforms (subject-based characteristics) from level gait to identify salient portions of the waveforms for comparison between the subject cohorts. These were classified to identify the differences between post-THA and non-pathological cohorts. The primary technique exposited in the THA analysis is classification and ranking belief simplex (CaRBS). Within the analysis, from the configuration of a CaRBS model, there is discussion on the model fit and contribution of the subject-based characteristics. Where appropriate, comparisons to the CaRBS model are made with the results from a logistic regression (LR) analysis. In terms of model fit, using CaRBS, 24 out of 27 LA/PA subjects (88.89%) and 13 out of 16 NP subjects (81.25%) were correctly classified as exhibiting either post-THA or NP hip functional characteristics during level gait, combining to 86.05% classification accuracy, compared with 81.40% classification accuracy when using LR.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3590648
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35906482013-03-11 A CaRBS analysis of hip replacement approaches and non-pathology Whatling, G.M. Beynon, M.J. Holt, C.A. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin Research Article This study investigates the differences in hip biomechanics for subjects following a total hip arthroplasty (THA), through the lateral approach (LA) and posterior approach (PA), to those with no pathology (NP). The principal component analysis was performed on two kinematic and two kinetic waveforms (subject-based characteristics) from level gait to identify salient portions of the waveforms for comparison between the subject cohorts. These were classified to identify the differences between post-THA and non-pathological cohorts. The primary technique exposited in the THA analysis is classification and ranking belief simplex (CaRBS). Within the analysis, from the configuration of a CaRBS model, there is discussion on the model fit and contribution of the subject-based characteristics. Where appropriate, comparisons to the CaRBS model are made with the results from a logistic regression (LR) analysis. In terms of model fit, using CaRBS, 24 out of 27 LA/PA subjects (88.89%) and 13 out of 16 NP subjects (81.25%) were correctly classified as exhibiting either post-THA or NP hip functional characteristics during level gait, combining to 86.05% classification accuracy, compared with 81.40% classification accuracy when using LR. Taylor & Francis 2012-01-31 2013-02 /pmc/articles/PMC3590648/ /pubmed/22292467 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10255842.2011.613380 Text en © 2013 Taylor & Francis http://www.informaworld.com/mpp/uploads/iopenaccess_tcs.pdf This is an open access article distributed under the Supplemental Terms and Conditions for iOpenAccess articles published in Taylor & Francis journals (http://www.informaworld.com/mpp/uploads/iopenaccess_tcs.pdf) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Whatling, G.M.
Beynon, M.J.
Holt, C.A.
A CaRBS analysis of hip replacement approaches and non-pathology
title A CaRBS analysis of hip replacement approaches and non-pathology
title_full A CaRBS analysis of hip replacement approaches and non-pathology
title_fullStr A CaRBS analysis of hip replacement approaches and non-pathology
title_full_unstemmed A CaRBS analysis of hip replacement approaches and non-pathology
title_short A CaRBS analysis of hip replacement approaches and non-pathology
title_sort carbs analysis of hip replacement approaches and non-pathology
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3590648/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22292467
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10255842.2011.613380
work_keys_str_mv AT whatlinggm acarbsanalysisofhipreplacementapproachesandnonpathology
AT beynonmj acarbsanalysisofhipreplacementapproachesandnonpathology
AT holtca acarbsanalysisofhipreplacementapproachesandnonpathology
AT whatlinggm carbsanalysisofhipreplacementapproachesandnonpathology
AT beynonmj carbsanalysisofhipreplacementapproachesandnonpathology
AT holtca carbsanalysisofhipreplacementapproachesandnonpathology