Cargando…

Validation of the pre-treatment neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio as a prognostic factor in a large European cohort of renal cell carcinoma patients

BACKGROUND: The neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio (NLR) has been proposed as an indicator of systemic inflammatory response. Several studies suggest a negative impact of increased NLR for patient's survival in different types of cancer. However, previous findings from small-scale studies revealed con...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pichler, M, Hutterer, G C, Stoeckigt, C, Chromecki, T F, Stojakovic, T, Golbeck, S, Eberhard, K, Gerger, A, Mannweiler, S, Pummer, K, Zigeuner, R
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3590665/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23385728
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2013.28
_version_ 1782261904104751104
author Pichler, M
Hutterer, G C
Stoeckigt, C
Chromecki, T F
Stojakovic, T
Golbeck, S
Eberhard, K
Gerger, A
Mannweiler, S
Pummer, K
Zigeuner, R
author_facet Pichler, M
Hutterer, G C
Stoeckigt, C
Chromecki, T F
Stojakovic, T
Golbeck, S
Eberhard, K
Gerger, A
Mannweiler, S
Pummer, K
Zigeuner, R
author_sort Pichler, M
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio (NLR) has been proposed as an indicator of systemic inflammatory response. Several studies suggest a negative impact of increased NLR for patient's survival in different types of cancer. However, previous findings from small-scale studies revealed conflicting results about its prognostic significance with regard to different clinical end points in non-metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients. Therefore, the aim of our study was the validation of the prognostic significance of NLR in a large cohort of RCC patients. METHODS: Data from 678 consecutive non-metastatic clear cell RCC patients, operated between 2000 and 2010 at a single centre, were evaluated retrospectively. Cancer-specific, metastasis-free, as well as overall survival (OS) were assessed using the Kaplan–Meier method. To evaluate the independent prognostic significance of NLR, multivariate Cox regression models were applied for all three different end points. Influence of the NLR on the predictive accuracy of the Leibovich prognosis score was determined by Harrell's concordance index. RESULTS: Multivariate analysis identified increased NLR as an independent prognostic factor for overall (hazard ratio (HR)=1.59, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.10–2.31, P=0.014), but not for cancer-specific (HR=1.59, 95% CI=0.84–2.99, P=0.148), nor for metastasis-free survival (HR=1.39, 95% CI=0.85–2.28, P=0.184). The estimated concordance index was 0.79 using the Leibovich risk score and 0.81 when NLR was added. CONCLUSION: Regarding patients' OS, an increased NLR represented an independent risk factor, which might reflect a higher risk for severe cardiovascular and other comorbidities. Adding the NLR to well-established prognostic models such as the Leibovich prognosis score might improve their predictive ability.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3590665
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35906652014-03-05 Validation of the pre-treatment neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio as a prognostic factor in a large European cohort of renal cell carcinoma patients Pichler, M Hutterer, G C Stoeckigt, C Chromecki, T F Stojakovic, T Golbeck, S Eberhard, K Gerger, A Mannweiler, S Pummer, K Zigeuner, R Br J Cancer Molecular Diagnostics BACKGROUND: The neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio (NLR) has been proposed as an indicator of systemic inflammatory response. Several studies suggest a negative impact of increased NLR for patient's survival in different types of cancer. However, previous findings from small-scale studies revealed conflicting results about its prognostic significance with regard to different clinical end points in non-metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients. Therefore, the aim of our study was the validation of the prognostic significance of NLR in a large cohort of RCC patients. METHODS: Data from 678 consecutive non-metastatic clear cell RCC patients, operated between 2000 and 2010 at a single centre, were evaluated retrospectively. Cancer-specific, metastasis-free, as well as overall survival (OS) were assessed using the Kaplan–Meier method. To evaluate the independent prognostic significance of NLR, multivariate Cox regression models were applied for all three different end points. Influence of the NLR on the predictive accuracy of the Leibovich prognosis score was determined by Harrell's concordance index. RESULTS: Multivariate analysis identified increased NLR as an independent prognostic factor for overall (hazard ratio (HR)=1.59, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.10–2.31, P=0.014), but not for cancer-specific (HR=1.59, 95% CI=0.84–2.99, P=0.148), nor for metastasis-free survival (HR=1.39, 95% CI=0.85–2.28, P=0.184). The estimated concordance index was 0.79 using the Leibovich risk score and 0.81 when NLR was added. CONCLUSION: Regarding patients' OS, an increased NLR represented an independent risk factor, which might reflect a higher risk for severe cardiovascular and other comorbidities. Adding the NLR to well-established prognostic models such as the Leibovich prognosis score might improve their predictive ability. Nature Publishing Group 2013-03-05 2013-02-05 /pmc/articles/PMC3590665/ /pubmed/23385728 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2013.28 Text en Copyright © 2013 Cancer Research UK http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ From twelve months after its original publication, this work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/
spellingShingle Molecular Diagnostics
Pichler, M
Hutterer, G C
Stoeckigt, C
Chromecki, T F
Stojakovic, T
Golbeck, S
Eberhard, K
Gerger, A
Mannweiler, S
Pummer, K
Zigeuner, R
Validation of the pre-treatment neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio as a prognostic factor in a large European cohort of renal cell carcinoma patients
title Validation of the pre-treatment neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio as a prognostic factor in a large European cohort of renal cell carcinoma patients
title_full Validation of the pre-treatment neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio as a prognostic factor in a large European cohort of renal cell carcinoma patients
title_fullStr Validation of the pre-treatment neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio as a prognostic factor in a large European cohort of renal cell carcinoma patients
title_full_unstemmed Validation of the pre-treatment neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio as a prognostic factor in a large European cohort of renal cell carcinoma patients
title_short Validation of the pre-treatment neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio as a prognostic factor in a large European cohort of renal cell carcinoma patients
title_sort validation of the pre-treatment neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio as a prognostic factor in a large european cohort of renal cell carcinoma patients
topic Molecular Diagnostics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3590665/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23385728
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2013.28
work_keys_str_mv AT pichlerm validationofthepretreatmentneutrophillymphocyteratioasaprognosticfactorinalargeeuropeancohortofrenalcellcarcinomapatients
AT hutterergc validationofthepretreatmentneutrophillymphocyteratioasaprognosticfactorinalargeeuropeancohortofrenalcellcarcinomapatients
AT stoeckigtc validationofthepretreatmentneutrophillymphocyteratioasaprognosticfactorinalargeeuropeancohortofrenalcellcarcinomapatients
AT chromeckitf validationofthepretreatmentneutrophillymphocyteratioasaprognosticfactorinalargeeuropeancohortofrenalcellcarcinomapatients
AT stojakovict validationofthepretreatmentneutrophillymphocyteratioasaprognosticfactorinalargeeuropeancohortofrenalcellcarcinomapatients
AT golbecks validationofthepretreatmentneutrophillymphocyteratioasaprognosticfactorinalargeeuropeancohortofrenalcellcarcinomapatients
AT eberhardk validationofthepretreatmentneutrophillymphocyteratioasaprognosticfactorinalargeeuropeancohortofrenalcellcarcinomapatients
AT gergera validationofthepretreatmentneutrophillymphocyteratioasaprognosticfactorinalargeeuropeancohortofrenalcellcarcinomapatients
AT mannweilers validationofthepretreatmentneutrophillymphocyteratioasaprognosticfactorinalargeeuropeancohortofrenalcellcarcinomapatients
AT pummerk validationofthepretreatmentneutrophillymphocyteratioasaprognosticfactorinalargeeuropeancohortofrenalcellcarcinomapatients
AT zigeunerr validationofthepretreatmentneutrophillymphocyteratioasaprognosticfactorinalargeeuropeancohortofrenalcellcarcinomapatients