Cargando…
Factors Predicting Single-Unit Predominance after Double Umbilical Cord Blood Transplantation
Double umbilical cord blood transplantation (dUCBT), developed as a strategy to treat larger patients with hematologic malignancies, frequently leads to the long-term establishment of a new hematopoietic system maintained by cells derived from a single UCB unit. However, predicting which unit will p...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3590908/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21946383 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bmt.2011.184 |
_version_ | 1782261943783915520 |
---|---|
author | Ramirez, Pablo Wagner, John E. DeFor, Todd E. Blazar, Bruce R. Verneris, Michael R. Miller, Jeffrey S. McKenna, David H. Weisdorf, Daniel J. McGlave, Philip B Brunstein, Claudio G. |
author_facet | Ramirez, Pablo Wagner, John E. DeFor, Todd E. Blazar, Bruce R. Verneris, Michael R. Miller, Jeffrey S. McKenna, David H. Weisdorf, Daniel J. McGlave, Philip B Brunstein, Claudio G. |
author_sort | Ramirez, Pablo |
collection | PubMed |
description | Double umbilical cord blood transplantation (dUCBT), developed as a strategy to treat larger patients with hematologic malignancies, frequently leads to the long-term establishment of a new hematopoietic system maintained by cells derived from a single UCB unit. However, predicting which unit will predominate has remained elusive. This retrospective study examined risk factor associated with unit predominance in 262 patients with hematologic malignancies who underwent dUCBT with subsequent hematopoietic recovery and complete chimerism between 2001–2009. Dual chimerism was detected at day 21–28, with subsequent single chimerism in 97% of cases by day +100 and beyond. Risk factors included nucleated cell dose, CD34+ and CD3+ cell dose, colony forming units-granulocyte macrophage dose, donor-recipient human leukocyte antigen (HLA) match, sex and ABO match, order of infusion, and cell viability. In the myeloablative setting, CD3+ cell dose was the only factor associated with unit predominance (OR 4.4, 95%CI, 1.8–10.6; p<0.01), but in the non-myeloablative setting, CD3+ cell dose (OR 2.1, 95%CI, 1.0–4.2; p=0.05) and HLA match (OR 3.4, 95%CI, 1.0–11.4; p=0.05) were independent factor associated with unit predominance. Taken together, these findings suggest that immune reactivity plays a role in unit predominance and should be considered during graft selection and graft manipulation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3590908 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35909082013-03-07 Factors Predicting Single-Unit Predominance after Double Umbilical Cord Blood Transplantation Ramirez, Pablo Wagner, John E. DeFor, Todd E. Blazar, Bruce R. Verneris, Michael R. Miller, Jeffrey S. McKenna, David H. Weisdorf, Daniel J. McGlave, Philip B Brunstein, Claudio G. Bone Marrow Transplant Article Double umbilical cord blood transplantation (dUCBT), developed as a strategy to treat larger patients with hematologic malignancies, frequently leads to the long-term establishment of a new hematopoietic system maintained by cells derived from a single UCB unit. However, predicting which unit will predominate has remained elusive. This retrospective study examined risk factor associated with unit predominance in 262 patients with hematologic malignancies who underwent dUCBT with subsequent hematopoietic recovery and complete chimerism between 2001–2009. Dual chimerism was detected at day 21–28, with subsequent single chimerism in 97% of cases by day +100 and beyond. Risk factors included nucleated cell dose, CD34+ and CD3+ cell dose, colony forming units-granulocyte macrophage dose, donor-recipient human leukocyte antigen (HLA) match, sex and ABO match, order of infusion, and cell viability. In the myeloablative setting, CD3+ cell dose was the only factor associated with unit predominance (OR 4.4, 95%CI, 1.8–10.6; p<0.01), but in the non-myeloablative setting, CD3+ cell dose (OR 2.1, 95%CI, 1.0–4.2; p=0.05) and HLA match (OR 3.4, 95%CI, 1.0–11.4; p=0.05) were independent factor associated with unit predominance. Taken together, these findings suggest that immune reactivity plays a role in unit predominance and should be considered during graft selection and graft manipulation. 2011-09-26 2012-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3590908/ /pubmed/21946383 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bmt.2011.184 Text en Users may view, print, copy, download and text and data- mine the content in such documents, for the purposes of academic research, subject always to the full Conditions of use: http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms |
spellingShingle | Article Ramirez, Pablo Wagner, John E. DeFor, Todd E. Blazar, Bruce R. Verneris, Michael R. Miller, Jeffrey S. McKenna, David H. Weisdorf, Daniel J. McGlave, Philip B Brunstein, Claudio G. Factors Predicting Single-Unit Predominance after Double Umbilical Cord Blood Transplantation |
title | Factors Predicting Single-Unit Predominance after Double Umbilical Cord Blood Transplantation |
title_full | Factors Predicting Single-Unit Predominance after Double Umbilical Cord Blood Transplantation |
title_fullStr | Factors Predicting Single-Unit Predominance after Double Umbilical Cord Blood Transplantation |
title_full_unstemmed | Factors Predicting Single-Unit Predominance after Double Umbilical Cord Blood Transplantation |
title_short | Factors Predicting Single-Unit Predominance after Double Umbilical Cord Blood Transplantation |
title_sort | factors predicting single-unit predominance after double umbilical cord blood transplantation |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3590908/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21946383 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bmt.2011.184 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ramirezpablo factorspredictingsingleunitpredominanceafterdoubleumbilicalcordbloodtransplantation AT wagnerjohne factorspredictingsingleunitpredominanceafterdoubleumbilicalcordbloodtransplantation AT defortodde factorspredictingsingleunitpredominanceafterdoubleumbilicalcordbloodtransplantation AT blazarbrucer factorspredictingsingleunitpredominanceafterdoubleumbilicalcordbloodtransplantation AT vernerismichaelr factorspredictingsingleunitpredominanceafterdoubleumbilicalcordbloodtransplantation AT millerjeffreys factorspredictingsingleunitpredominanceafterdoubleumbilicalcordbloodtransplantation AT mckennadavidh factorspredictingsingleunitpredominanceafterdoubleumbilicalcordbloodtransplantation AT weisdorfdanielj factorspredictingsingleunitpredominanceafterdoubleumbilicalcordbloodtransplantation AT mcglavephilipb factorspredictingsingleunitpredominanceafterdoubleumbilicalcordbloodtransplantation AT brunsteinclaudiog factorspredictingsingleunitpredominanceafterdoubleumbilicalcordbloodtransplantation |