Cargando…

Factors Predicting Single-Unit Predominance after Double Umbilical Cord Blood Transplantation

Double umbilical cord blood transplantation (dUCBT), developed as a strategy to treat larger patients with hematologic malignancies, frequently leads to the long-term establishment of a new hematopoietic system maintained by cells derived from a single UCB unit. However, predicting which unit will p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ramirez, Pablo, Wagner, John E., DeFor, Todd E., Blazar, Bruce R., Verneris, Michael R., Miller, Jeffrey S., McKenna, David H., Weisdorf, Daniel J., McGlave, Philip B, Brunstein, Claudio G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3590908/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21946383
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bmt.2011.184
_version_ 1782261943783915520
author Ramirez, Pablo
Wagner, John E.
DeFor, Todd E.
Blazar, Bruce R.
Verneris, Michael R.
Miller, Jeffrey S.
McKenna, David H.
Weisdorf, Daniel J.
McGlave, Philip B
Brunstein, Claudio G.
author_facet Ramirez, Pablo
Wagner, John E.
DeFor, Todd E.
Blazar, Bruce R.
Verneris, Michael R.
Miller, Jeffrey S.
McKenna, David H.
Weisdorf, Daniel J.
McGlave, Philip B
Brunstein, Claudio G.
author_sort Ramirez, Pablo
collection PubMed
description Double umbilical cord blood transplantation (dUCBT), developed as a strategy to treat larger patients with hematologic malignancies, frequently leads to the long-term establishment of a new hematopoietic system maintained by cells derived from a single UCB unit. However, predicting which unit will predominate has remained elusive. This retrospective study examined risk factor associated with unit predominance in 262 patients with hematologic malignancies who underwent dUCBT with subsequent hematopoietic recovery and complete chimerism between 2001–2009. Dual chimerism was detected at day 21–28, with subsequent single chimerism in 97% of cases by day +100 and beyond. Risk factors included nucleated cell dose, CD34+ and CD3+ cell dose, colony forming units-granulocyte macrophage dose, donor-recipient human leukocyte antigen (HLA) match, sex and ABO match, order of infusion, and cell viability. In the myeloablative setting, CD3+ cell dose was the only factor associated with unit predominance (OR 4.4, 95%CI, 1.8–10.6; p<0.01), but in the non-myeloablative setting, CD3+ cell dose (OR 2.1, 95%CI, 1.0–4.2; p=0.05) and HLA match (OR 3.4, 95%CI, 1.0–11.4; p=0.05) were independent factor associated with unit predominance. Taken together, these findings suggest that immune reactivity plays a role in unit predominance and should be considered during graft selection and graft manipulation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3590908
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35909082013-03-07 Factors Predicting Single-Unit Predominance after Double Umbilical Cord Blood Transplantation Ramirez, Pablo Wagner, John E. DeFor, Todd E. Blazar, Bruce R. Verneris, Michael R. Miller, Jeffrey S. McKenna, David H. Weisdorf, Daniel J. McGlave, Philip B Brunstein, Claudio G. Bone Marrow Transplant Article Double umbilical cord blood transplantation (dUCBT), developed as a strategy to treat larger patients with hematologic malignancies, frequently leads to the long-term establishment of a new hematopoietic system maintained by cells derived from a single UCB unit. However, predicting which unit will predominate has remained elusive. This retrospective study examined risk factor associated with unit predominance in 262 patients with hematologic malignancies who underwent dUCBT with subsequent hematopoietic recovery and complete chimerism between 2001–2009. Dual chimerism was detected at day 21–28, with subsequent single chimerism in 97% of cases by day +100 and beyond. Risk factors included nucleated cell dose, CD34+ and CD3+ cell dose, colony forming units-granulocyte macrophage dose, donor-recipient human leukocyte antigen (HLA) match, sex and ABO match, order of infusion, and cell viability. In the myeloablative setting, CD3+ cell dose was the only factor associated with unit predominance (OR 4.4, 95%CI, 1.8–10.6; p<0.01), but in the non-myeloablative setting, CD3+ cell dose (OR 2.1, 95%CI, 1.0–4.2; p=0.05) and HLA match (OR 3.4, 95%CI, 1.0–11.4; p=0.05) were independent factor associated with unit predominance. Taken together, these findings suggest that immune reactivity plays a role in unit predominance and should be considered during graft selection and graft manipulation. 2011-09-26 2012-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3590908/ /pubmed/21946383 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bmt.2011.184 Text en Users may view, print, copy, download and text and data- mine the content in such documents, for the purposes of academic research, subject always to the full Conditions of use: http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms
spellingShingle Article
Ramirez, Pablo
Wagner, John E.
DeFor, Todd E.
Blazar, Bruce R.
Verneris, Michael R.
Miller, Jeffrey S.
McKenna, David H.
Weisdorf, Daniel J.
McGlave, Philip B
Brunstein, Claudio G.
Factors Predicting Single-Unit Predominance after Double Umbilical Cord Blood Transplantation
title Factors Predicting Single-Unit Predominance after Double Umbilical Cord Blood Transplantation
title_full Factors Predicting Single-Unit Predominance after Double Umbilical Cord Blood Transplantation
title_fullStr Factors Predicting Single-Unit Predominance after Double Umbilical Cord Blood Transplantation
title_full_unstemmed Factors Predicting Single-Unit Predominance after Double Umbilical Cord Blood Transplantation
title_short Factors Predicting Single-Unit Predominance after Double Umbilical Cord Blood Transplantation
title_sort factors predicting single-unit predominance after double umbilical cord blood transplantation
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3590908/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21946383
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bmt.2011.184
work_keys_str_mv AT ramirezpablo factorspredictingsingleunitpredominanceafterdoubleumbilicalcordbloodtransplantation
AT wagnerjohne factorspredictingsingleunitpredominanceafterdoubleumbilicalcordbloodtransplantation
AT defortodde factorspredictingsingleunitpredominanceafterdoubleumbilicalcordbloodtransplantation
AT blazarbrucer factorspredictingsingleunitpredominanceafterdoubleumbilicalcordbloodtransplantation
AT vernerismichaelr factorspredictingsingleunitpredominanceafterdoubleumbilicalcordbloodtransplantation
AT millerjeffreys factorspredictingsingleunitpredominanceafterdoubleumbilicalcordbloodtransplantation
AT mckennadavidh factorspredictingsingleunitpredominanceafterdoubleumbilicalcordbloodtransplantation
AT weisdorfdanielj factorspredictingsingleunitpredominanceafterdoubleumbilicalcordbloodtransplantation
AT mcglavephilipb factorspredictingsingleunitpredominanceafterdoubleumbilicalcordbloodtransplantation
AT brunsteinclaudiog factorspredictingsingleunitpredominanceafterdoubleumbilicalcordbloodtransplantation