Cargando…

The Diagnostic Role of FDG PET/CT in Patients with Fever of Unknown Origin

Objective: Fever of unknown origin (FUO) is a challenge for the physician and needs use of clinical, laboratory, and imaging studies and also invasive and/or non-invasive interventions to detect the etiology. The aim of present study was to assess the role of FDG PET/CT in determining the etiology i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ergül, Nurhan, Halac, Metin, Cermik, Tevfik F., Ozaras, Resat, Sager, Sait, Onsel, Çetin, Uslu, Ilhami
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Galenos Publishing 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3590939/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23487158
http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/MIRT.20.04
Descripción
Sumario:Objective: Fever of unknown origin (FUO) is a challenge for the physician and needs use of clinical, laboratory, and imaging studies and also invasive and/or non-invasive interventions to detect the etiology. The aim of present study was to assess the role of FDG PET/CT in determining the etiology in patients with FUO. Material and Methods: Twenty-four patients (median age 52, range 5-77 years, 6 female, 18 male) who were diagnosed with FUO were retrospectively analyzed in this study. Before the FDG PET/CT studies, none of them had a definitive reason for their diseases investigated by conventional radiological or scintigraphic methods, clinical and laboratory observations. Results: The positive result was achieved in 19 (79.2%) of 24 patients as findings of the FDG PET/CT. However, FDG PET/CT was useful for definitive diagnosis in 12 (63.2%) of 19 positive patients. Malignant diseases were determined to be the underlying cause of FUO in 5 (41.6%) of 12 patients. Noninfectious inflammatory causes were detected in 2 (16.7%) patients, infections were exhibited in 3 (25%) patients, and miscellaneous diseases demonstrated in 2 (16.7%) patients. In 7 patients the detected pathological uptakes on FDG PET/CT were not helpful for the definitive diagnosis. In remaining 5 patients who showed no pathological uptake in the FDG PET/CT, diagnosis could not be established by other methods, as well. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for the determination of FUO etiology were 92.3%, 45.4%, 63.1%, and 100% for FDG PET/CT. Conclusion: Our results demonstrate that FDG PET/CT seems to have considerable contribution to reveal the reason of undiagnosed patients with FUO investigated by conventional diagnostic methods, clinical and laboratory observations. Conflict of interest:None declared.