Cargando…

Cleft palate repair in Mongolia: Modified palatoplasty vs. conventional technique

CONTEXT: Cleft palate repair is preferentially completed between 6 and 18 months of age, facilitating essential speech and language development along with swallowing and feeding reflexes, and avoiding otitis media and hearing loss. In Mongolia patients often present in early adulthood for cleft lip...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gongorjav, N. Ayanga, Luvsandorj, Davaanyam, Nyanrag, Purevjav, Garidhuu, Ariuntuul, Sarah, E. Gardiner
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3591054/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23482408
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2231-0746.101337
_version_ 1782261971883655168
author Gongorjav, N. Ayanga
Luvsandorj, Davaanyam
Nyanrag, Purevjav
Garidhuu, Ariuntuul
Sarah, E. Gardiner
author_facet Gongorjav, N. Ayanga
Luvsandorj, Davaanyam
Nyanrag, Purevjav
Garidhuu, Ariuntuul
Sarah, E. Gardiner
author_sort Gongorjav, N. Ayanga
collection PubMed
description CONTEXT: Cleft palate repair is preferentially completed between 6 and 18 months of age, facilitating essential speech and language development along with swallowing and feeding reflexes, and avoiding otitis media and hearing loss. In Mongolia patients often present in early adulthood for cleft lip and/or palate management. Wider defects are associated with older age groups and have higher rates of fistula formation and wound dehiscence. These complications encouraged a modified surgical technique for improved outcomes. AIMS: Objectives of this study were to compare the efficacy of three established palatoplasty techniques with our mongolian technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of all palatoplasty cases, in non-syndromic cleft lip and/or palate patients, between January 1992 and November 2008 in Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia was performed. Exclusion criteria included those suffering from an acute or chronic respiratory illness at presentation or in the recovery period. We compared three established techniques with our modified technique. Outcome measures were duration of surgery, length of hospital stay and fistula rate. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Discrete data are reported as n (%), while continuous data are summarised as mean±SD. Differences in demographic, surgical and postoperative data were tested by independent t-test (continuous data) and Fisher's exact test (discrete data). RESULTS: Palatoplasty was performed on 436 patients with an average age of 60 months. The modified palatoplasty technique had reduced surgical time (P value <0.01) and hospital stay (P value <0.01) and a 96% complication free wound recovery, compared with established techniques. Cleft lip and/or palate patients aged 42 months or older were more likely to be from the countryside. CONCLUSIONS: 86.9% of patients presenting for cleft palate repair had palatoplasty later than the recommended age. Geographical predilection for children older than six years, were more likely to have cleft palate repair complications. We have shown the modified palatoplasty technique is a more efficient time saving surgical procedure with lower complication rates.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3591054
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35910542013-03-11 Cleft palate repair in Mongolia: Modified palatoplasty vs. conventional technique Gongorjav, N. Ayanga Luvsandorj, Davaanyam Nyanrag, Purevjav Garidhuu, Ariuntuul Sarah, E. Gardiner Ann Maxillofac Surg Original Article - Comparative Study CONTEXT: Cleft palate repair is preferentially completed between 6 and 18 months of age, facilitating essential speech and language development along with swallowing and feeding reflexes, and avoiding otitis media and hearing loss. In Mongolia patients often present in early adulthood for cleft lip and/or palate management. Wider defects are associated with older age groups and have higher rates of fistula formation and wound dehiscence. These complications encouraged a modified surgical technique for improved outcomes. AIMS: Objectives of this study were to compare the efficacy of three established palatoplasty techniques with our mongolian technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of all palatoplasty cases, in non-syndromic cleft lip and/or palate patients, between January 1992 and November 2008 in Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia was performed. Exclusion criteria included those suffering from an acute or chronic respiratory illness at presentation or in the recovery period. We compared three established techniques with our modified technique. Outcome measures were duration of surgery, length of hospital stay and fistula rate. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Discrete data are reported as n (%), while continuous data are summarised as mean±SD. Differences in demographic, surgical and postoperative data were tested by independent t-test (continuous data) and Fisher's exact test (discrete data). RESULTS: Palatoplasty was performed on 436 patients with an average age of 60 months. The modified palatoplasty technique had reduced surgical time (P value <0.01) and hospital stay (P value <0.01) and a 96% complication free wound recovery, compared with established techniques. Cleft lip and/or palate patients aged 42 months or older were more likely to be from the countryside. CONCLUSIONS: 86.9% of patients presenting for cleft palate repair had palatoplasty later than the recommended age. Geographical predilection for children older than six years, were more likely to have cleft palate repair complications. We have shown the modified palatoplasty technique is a more efficient time saving surgical procedure with lower complication rates. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC3591054/ /pubmed/23482408 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2231-0746.101337 Text en Copyright: © Annals of Maxillofacial Surgery http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article - Comparative Study
Gongorjav, N. Ayanga
Luvsandorj, Davaanyam
Nyanrag, Purevjav
Garidhuu, Ariuntuul
Sarah, E. Gardiner
Cleft palate repair in Mongolia: Modified palatoplasty vs. conventional technique
title Cleft palate repair in Mongolia: Modified palatoplasty vs. conventional technique
title_full Cleft palate repair in Mongolia: Modified palatoplasty vs. conventional technique
title_fullStr Cleft palate repair in Mongolia: Modified palatoplasty vs. conventional technique
title_full_unstemmed Cleft palate repair in Mongolia: Modified palatoplasty vs. conventional technique
title_short Cleft palate repair in Mongolia: Modified palatoplasty vs. conventional technique
title_sort cleft palate repair in mongolia: modified palatoplasty vs. conventional technique
topic Original Article - Comparative Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3591054/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23482408
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2231-0746.101337
work_keys_str_mv AT gongorjavnayanga cleftpalaterepairinmongoliamodifiedpalatoplastyvsconventionaltechnique
AT luvsandorjdavaanyam cleftpalaterepairinmongoliamodifiedpalatoplastyvsconventionaltechnique
AT nyanragpurevjav cleftpalaterepairinmongoliamodifiedpalatoplastyvsconventionaltechnique
AT garidhuuariuntuul cleftpalaterepairinmongoliamodifiedpalatoplastyvsconventionaltechnique
AT sarahegardiner cleftpalaterepairinmongoliamodifiedpalatoplastyvsconventionaltechnique