Cargando…

Experience with craniosynostosis treatment using posterior cranial vault distraction osteogenesis

BACKGROUND: Craniosynostosis compromises the cranial vault volume, severely impede growth, and may lead to increased intracranial pressure (ICP). Posterior cranial vault (PCV) distraction osteogenesis (DO) offers an excellent treatment opportunity for this condition. This article intends to describe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ylikontiola, Leena P., Sándor, George K., Salokorpi, Niina, Serlo, Willy S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3591073/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23482323
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2231-0746.95307
_version_ 1782261976184913920
author Ylikontiola, Leena P.
Sándor, George K.
Salokorpi, Niina
Serlo, Willy S.
author_facet Ylikontiola, Leena P.
Sándor, George K.
Salokorpi, Niina
Serlo, Willy S.
author_sort Ylikontiola, Leena P.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Craniosynostosis compromises the cranial vault volume, severely impede growth, and may lead to increased intracranial pressure (ICP). Posterior cranial vault (PCV) distraction osteogenesis (DO) offers an excellent treatment opportunity for this condition. This article intends to describe the outcomes of PCV DO. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nine males and seven female children indicated for PCV DO were included in the study. The single vector distraction devices with quick-disconnect distraction rods, a type of miniaturized hardware, was used in all cases. RESULT: Seven of the 16 patients had a history of one or more prior cranioplasty. All reoperations in this series were performed for the indication of raised ICP including five of the scaphocephaly patients and the syndromic patients. Clinical signs of raised ICP were present in all patients with either measured raised intracranial pressure or those with clinical signs of raised ICP preoperatively. There was substantial decrease in the ICP postoperatively. DISCUSSION: The outcomes of this study were encouraging. Placing the distractor stems as flat as possible against the outer layer of the cranial bone seems to be a very important maneuver. This keeps the distractor stem less proud and less likely to sustain future trauma. Removal of the distractor stems keeps the devices further away from the risk of later traumatic dislodgement. Moreover, miniaturized distractors allow precise control of the rate and the amount of distraction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3591073
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35910732013-03-11 Experience with craniosynostosis treatment using posterior cranial vault distraction osteogenesis Ylikontiola, Leena P. Sándor, George K. Salokorpi, Niina Serlo, Willy S. Ann Maxillofac Surg Emerging Technologies BACKGROUND: Craniosynostosis compromises the cranial vault volume, severely impede growth, and may lead to increased intracranial pressure (ICP). Posterior cranial vault (PCV) distraction osteogenesis (DO) offers an excellent treatment opportunity for this condition. This article intends to describe the outcomes of PCV DO. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nine males and seven female children indicated for PCV DO were included in the study. The single vector distraction devices with quick-disconnect distraction rods, a type of miniaturized hardware, was used in all cases. RESULT: Seven of the 16 patients had a history of one or more prior cranioplasty. All reoperations in this series were performed for the indication of raised ICP including five of the scaphocephaly patients and the syndromic patients. Clinical signs of raised ICP were present in all patients with either measured raised intracranial pressure or those with clinical signs of raised ICP preoperatively. There was substantial decrease in the ICP postoperatively. DISCUSSION: The outcomes of this study were encouraging. Placing the distractor stems as flat as possible against the outer layer of the cranial bone seems to be a very important maneuver. This keeps the distractor stem less proud and less likely to sustain future trauma. Removal of the distractor stems keeps the devices further away from the risk of later traumatic dislodgement. Moreover, miniaturized distractors allow precise control of the rate and the amount of distraction. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC3591073/ /pubmed/23482323 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2231-0746.95307 Text en Copyright: © Annals of Maxillofacial Surgery http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Emerging Technologies
Ylikontiola, Leena P.
Sándor, George K.
Salokorpi, Niina
Serlo, Willy S.
Experience with craniosynostosis treatment using posterior cranial vault distraction osteogenesis
title Experience with craniosynostosis treatment using posterior cranial vault distraction osteogenesis
title_full Experience with craniosynostosis treatment using posterior cranial vault distraction osteogenesis
title_fullStr Experience with craniosynostosis treatment using posterior cranial vault distraction osteogenesis
title_full_unstemmed Experience with craniosynostosis treatment using posterior cranial vault distraction osteogenesis
title_short Experience with craniosynostosis treatment using posterior cranial vault distraction osteogenesis
title_sort experience with craniosynostosis treatment using posterior cranial vault distraction osteogenesis
topic Emerging Technologies
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3591073/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23482323
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2231-0746.95307
work_keys_str_mv AT ylikontiolaleenap experiencewithcraniosynostosistreatmentusingposteriorcranialvaultdistractionosteogenesis
AT sandorgeorgek experiencewithcraniosynostosistreatmentusingposteriorcranialvaultdistractionosteogenesis
AT salokorpiniina experiencewithcraniosynostosistreatmentusingposteriorcranialvaultdistractionosteogenesis
AT serlowillys experiencewithcraniosynostosistreatmentusingposteriorcranialvaultdistractionosteogenesis