Cargando…

Mandibular symphysis graft versus iliac cortical graft in reconstructing floor in orbital blow out fracture: A comparative study

AIM: The purpose of this study was to clinically and radiologically assess and compare the outcome of internal orbital reconstruction with an iliac bone graft and mandibular symphysis graft in orbital blow out fractures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eight consecutive patients with unilateral orbital blow...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Anitha, G. L., Maheswari, G. Uma, Sethurajan, B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3591074/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23482420
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2231-0746.95312
_version_ 1782261976410357760
author Anitha, G. L.
Maheswari, G. Uma
Sethurajan, B.
author_facet Anitha, G. L.
Maheswari, G. Uma
Sethurajan, B.
author_sort Anitha, G. L.
collection PubMed
description AIM: The purpose of this study was to clinically and radiologically assess and compare the outcome of internal orbital reconstruction with an iliac bone graft and mandibular symphysis graft in orbital blow out fractures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eight consecutive patients with unilateral orbital blow out fractures were enrolled in this prospective study. CT scan imaging and volumetric assessment of the orbit was done for all patients using GE Discovery VCT Workstation 4.4. Patients with defect of area less than 2 cm(2) and orbital volume expansion of less than 4.7 cm(3) were treated with mandibular symphysis graft, in contrast the others were treated with a medial cortical graft from the anterior ilium. At each follow-up visit, globe posture, diplopia, and eye movements were assessed. Coronal and sagittal computed tomography and volumetric assessment were used to observe graft posture, bone defects and contour. RESULTS: Group I cases showed that orbital volume changes of less than 2cm(3) can be effectively reduced. Group II cases showed that orbital volume changes of more than 4.5 cm(3) could not be effectively restored in spite of using large iliac graft. All eight patients had satisfactory correction of hypoglobus. Diplopia and ocular motility restriction resolved in all affected patients post operatively between 4(th) day and 2(nd) week. At 3-month follow-up, computed tomography demonstrated that the middle section of the orbital floor was well elevated in all 8 orbits. All grafts were still in situ, with density measured in Hounsfield units revealed that the Mandible Symphyseal graft was denser. CONCLUSION: The mandibular symphysis graft is a good, simple reconstructive option in small orbital floor defects with orbital volume change less than 4.71 ml. In larger defects with huge orbital volume changes that require more volume of graft, iliac graft is useful albeit, perfect, volumetric restoration is not always possible
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3591074
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35910742013-03-11 Mandibular symphysis graft versus iliac cortical graft in reconstructing floor in orbital blow out fracture: A comparative study Anitha, G. L. Maheswari, G. Uma Sethurajan, B. Ann Maxillofac Surg Original Clinical Studies AIM: The purpose of this study was to clinically and radiologically assess and compare the outcome of internal orbital reconstruction with an iliac bone graft and mandibular symphysis graft in orbital blow out fractures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eight consecutive patients with unilateral orbital blow out fractures were enrolled in this prospective study. CT scan imaging and volumetric assessment of the orbit was done for all patients using GE Discovery VCT Workstation 4.4. Patients with defect of area less than 2 cm(2) and orbital volume expansion of less than 4.7 cm(3) were treated with mandibular symphysis graft, in contrast the others were treated with a medial cortical graft from the anterior ilium. At each follow-up visit, globe posture, diplopia, and eye movements were assessed. Coronal and sagittal computed tomography and volumetric assessment were used to observe graft posture, bone defects and contour. RESULTS: Group I cases showed that orbital volume changes of less than 2cm(3) can be effectively reduced. Group II cases showed that orbital volume changes of more than 4.5 cm(3) could not be effectively restored in spite of using large iliac graft. All eight patients had satisfactory correction of hypoglobus. Diplopia and ocular motility restriction resolved in all affected patients post operatively between 4(th) day and 2(nd) week. At 3-month follow-up, computed tomography demonstrated that the middle section of the orbital floor was well elevated in all 8 orbits. All grafts were still in situ, with density measured in Hounsfield units revealed that the Mandible Symphyseal graft was denser. CONCLUSION: The mandibular symphysis graft is a good, simple reconstructive option in small orbital floor defects with orbital volume change less than 4.71 ml. In larger defects with huge orbital volume changes that require more volume of graft, iliac graft is useful albeit, perfect, volumetric restoration is not always possible Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC3591074/ /pubmed/23482420 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2231-0746.95312 Text en Copyright: © Annals of Maxillofacial Surgery http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Clinical Studies
Anitha, G. L.
Maheswari, G. Uma
Sethurajan, B.
Mandibular symphysis graft versus iliac cortical graft in reconstructing floor in orbital blow out fracture: A comparative study
title Mandibular symphysis graft versus iliac cortical graft in reconstructing floor in orbital blow out fracture: A comparative study
title_full Mandibular symphysis graft versus iliac cortical graft in reconstructing floor in orbital blow out fracture: A comparative study
title_fullStr Mandibular symphysis graft versus iliac cortical graft in reconstructing floor in orbital blow out fracture: A comparative study
title_full_unstemmed Mandibular symphysis graft versus iliac cortical graft in reconstructing floor in orbital blow out fracture: A comparative study
title_short Mandibular symphysis graft versus iliac cortical graft in reconstructing floor in orbital blow out fracture: A comparative study
title_sort mandibular symphysis graft versus iliac cortical graft in reconstructing floor in orbital blow out fracture: a comparative study
topic Original Clinical Studies
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3591074/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23482420
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2231-0746.95312
work_keys_str_mv AT anithagl mandibularsymphysisgraftversusiliaccorticalgraftinreconstructingfloorinorbitalblowoutfractureacomparativestudy
AT maheswariguma mandibularsymphysisgraftversusiliaccorticalgraftinreconstructingfloorinorbitalblowoutfractureacomparativestudy
AT sethurajanb mandibularsymphysisgraftversusiliaccorticalgraftinreconstructingfloorinorbitalblowoutfractureacomparativestudy