Cargando…

Evaluation of facial nerve function following surgical approaches for maxillofacial trauma

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to report facial nerve injury following extraoral surgical approaches for the treatment of maxillofacial trauma, using the House–Brackmann facial nerve grading system (HBFNGS) as a means of classifying and measuring the degree and type of injury. MATERIALS AND METH...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Prabhu, Rajkumar K., Sinha, Ramen, Chowdhury, Sanjay Kumar Roy, Chattopadhyay, Prabodh K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3591081/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23482876
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2231-0746.95315
_version_ 1782261978009436160
author Prabhu, Rajkumar K.
Sinha, Ramen
Chowdhury, Sanjay Kumar Roy
Chattopadhyay, Prabodh K.
author_facet Prabhu, Rajkumar K.
Sinha, Ramen
Chowdhury, Sanjay Kumar Roy
Chattopadhyay, Prabodh K.
author_sort Prabhu, Rajkumar K.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to report facial nerve injury following extraoral surgical approaches for the treatment of maxillofacial trauma, using the House–Brackmann facial nerve grading system (HBFNGS) as a means of classifying and measuring the degree and type of injury. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The sample comprised 100 consecutive cases of various maxillofacial trauma in which extraoral surgical approaches were used. Variety of surgical approaches such as coronal, preauricular, endaural, retromandibular, and submandibular approach and its modifications were used based on the anatomic location of the fracture and the accessibility required for its reduction and fixation. Facial nerve function of all patients was evaluated preoperatively and 24 hours after surgery. Patients who presented postoperative facial nerve injury were likewise examined using the HBFNGS at 24 hours, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months. RESULTS: Of the 100 patients, temporofacial branch involvement was seen in 11 cases, whereas cervicofacial branch involvement was seen in 6 cases. Complete recovery of the temporofacial branches was seen in a period of 3–4 months; whereas cervicofacial branches recovered in 5–6 months postoperatively. CONCLUSION: The frequency of facial nerve injury was related to various surgical approaches in maxillofacial trauma. Facial nerve impairment was found to be temporary in all cases, although the recovery of cervicofacial branches took a longer time. Moreover, there is a need to standardize the reporting of facial nerve recovery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3591081
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35910812013-03-11 Evaluation of facial nerve function following surgical approaches for maxillofacial trauma Prabhu, Rajkumar K. Sinha, Ramen Chowdhury, Sanjay Kumar Roy Chattopadhyay, Prabodh K. Ann Maxillofac Surg Evaluative Studies PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to report facial nerve injury following extraoral surgical approaches for the treatment of maxillofacial trauma, using the House–Brackmann facial nerve grading system (HBFNGS) as a means of classifying and measuring the degree and type of injury. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The sample comprised 100 consecutive cases of various maxillofacial trauma in which extraoral surgical approaches were used. Variety of surgical approaches such as coronal, preauricular, endaural, retromandibular, and submandibular approach and its modifications were used based on the anatomic location of the fracture and the accessibility required for its reduction and fixation. Facial nerve function of all patients was evaluated preoperatively and 24 hours after surgery. Patients who presented postoperative facial nerve injury were likewise examined using the HBFNGS at 24 hours, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months. RESULTS: Of the 100 patients, temporofacial branch involvement was seen in 11 cases, whereas cervicofacial branch involvement was seen in 6 cases. Complete recovery of the temporofacial branches was seen in a period of 3–4 months; whereas cervicofacial branches recovered in 5–6 months postoperatively. CONCLUSION: The frequency of facial nerve injury was related to various surgical approaches in maxillofacial trauma. Facial nerve impairment was found to be temporary in all cases, although the recovery of cervicofacial branches took a longer time. Moreover, there is a need to standardize the reporting of facial nerve recovery. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC3591081/ /pubmed/23482876 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2231-0746.95315 Text en Copyright: © Annals of Maxillofacial Surgery http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Evaluative Studies
Prabhu, Rajkumar K.
Sinha, Ramen
Chowdhury, Sanjay Kumar Roy
Chattopadhyay, Prabodh K.
Evaluation of facial nerve function following surgical approaches for maxillofacial trauma
title Evaluation of facial nerve function following surgical approaches for maxillofacial trauma
title_full Evaluation of facial nerve function following surgical approaches for maxillofacial trauma
title_fullStr Evaluation of facial nerve function following surgical approaches for maxillofacial trauma
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of facial nerve function following surgical approaches for maxillofacial trauma
title_short Evaluation of facial nerve function following surgical approaches for maxillofacial trauma
title_sort evaluation of facial nerve function following surgical approaches for maxillofacial trauma
topic Evaluative Studies
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3591081/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23482876
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2231-0746.95315
work_keys_str_mv AT prabhurajkumark evaluationoffacialnervefunctionfollowingsurgicalapproachesformaxillofacialtrauma
AT sinharamen evaluationoffacialnervefunctionfollowingsurgicalapproachesformaxillofacialtrauma
AT chowdhurysanjaykumarroy evaluationoffacialnervefunctionfollowingsurgicalapproachesformaxillofacialtrauma
AT chattopadhyayprabodhk evaluationoffacialnervefunctionfollowingsurgicalapproachesformaxillofacialtrauma