Cargando…
SHRINE: Enabling Nationally Scalable Multi-Site Disease Studies
Results of medical research studies are often contradictory or cannot be reproduced. One reason is that there may not be enough patient subjects available for observation for a long enough time period. Another reason is that patient populations may vary considerably with respect to geographic and de...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3591385/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23533569 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0055811 |
_version_ | 1782262045167583232 |
---|---|
author | McMurry, Andrew J. Murphy, Shawn N. MacFadden, Douglas Weber, Griffin Simons, William W. Orechia, John Bickel, Jonathan Wattanasin, Nich Gilbert, Clint Trevvett, Philip Churchill, Susanne Kohane, Isaac S. |
author_facet | McMurry, Andrew J. Murphy, Shawn N. MacFadden, Douglas Weber, Griffin Simons, William W. Orechia, John Bickel, Jonathan Wattanasin, Nich Gilbert, Clint Trevvett, Philip Churchill, Susanne Kohane, Isaac S. |
author_sort | McMurry, Andrew J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Results of medical research studies are often contradictory or cannot be reproduced. One reason is that there may not be enough patient subjects available for observation for a long enough time period. Another reason is that patient populations may vary considerably with respect to geographic and demographic boundaries thus limiting how broadly the results apply. Even when similar patient populations are pooled together from multiple locations, differences in medical treatment and record systems can limit which outcome measures can be commonly analyzed. In total, these differences in medical research settings can lead to differing conclusions or can even prevent some studies from starting. We thus sought to create a patient research system that could aggregate as many patient observations as possible from a large number of hospitals in a uniform way. We call this system the ‘Shared Health Research Information Network’, with the following properties: (1) reuse electronic health data from everyday clinical care for research purposes, (2) respect patient privacy and hospital autonomy, (3) aggregate patient populations across many hospitals to achieve statistically significant sample sizes that can be validated independently of a single research setting, (4) harmonize the observation facts recorded at each institution such that queries can be made across many hospitals in parallel, (5) scale to regional and national collaborations. The purpose of this report is to provide open source software for multi-site clinical studies and to report on early uses of this application. At this time SHRINE implementations have been used for multi-site studies of autism co-morbidity, juvenile idiopathic arthritis, peripartum cardiomyopathy, colorectal cancer, diabetes, and others. The wide range of study objectives and growing adoption suggest that SHRINE may be applicable beyond the research uses and participating hospitals named in this report. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3591385 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35913852013-03-26 SHRINE: Enabling Nationally Scalable Multi-Site Disease Studies McMurry, Andrew J. Murphy, Shawn N. MacFadden, Douglas Weber, Griffin Simons, William W. Orechia, John Bickel, Jonathan Wattanasin, Nich Gilbert, Clint Trevvett, Philip Churchill, Susanne Kohane, Isaac S. PLoS One Research Article Results of medical research studies are often contradictory or cannot be reproduced. One reason is that there may not be enough patient subjects available for observation for a long enough time period. Another reason is that patient populations may vary considerably with respect to geographic and demographic boundaries thus limiting how broadly the results apply. Even when similar patient populations are pooled together from multiple locations, differences in medical treatment and record systems can limit which outcome measures can be commonly analyzed. In total, these differences in medical research settings can lead to differing conclusions or can even prevent some studies from starting. We thus sought to create a patient research system that could aggregate as many patient observations as possible from a large number of hospitals in a uniform way. We call this system the ‘Shared Health Research Information Network’, with the following properties: (1) reuse electronic health data from everyday clinical care for research purposes, (2) respect patient privacy and hospital autonomy, (3) aggregate patient populations across many hospitals to achieve statistically significant sample sizes that can be validated independently of a single research setting, (4) harmonize the observation facts recorded at each institution such that queries can be made across many hospitals in parallel, (5) scale to regional and national collaborations. The purpose of this report is to provide open source software for multi-site clinical studies and to report on early uses of this application. At this time SHRINE implementations have been used for multi-site studies of autism co-morbidity, juvenile idiopathic arthritis, peripartum cardiomyopathy, colorectal cancer, diabetes, and others. The wide range of study objectives and growing adoption suggest that SHRINE may be applicable beyond the research uses and participating hospitals named in this report. Public Library of Science 2013-03-07 /pmc/articles/PMC3591385/ /pubmed/23533569 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0055811 Text en © 2013 McMurry et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article McMurry, Andrew J. Murphy, Shawn N. MacFadden, Douglas Weber, Griffin Simons, William W. Orechia, John Bickel, Jonathan Wattanasin, Nich Gilbert, Clint Trevvett, Philip Churchill, Susanne Kohane, Isaac S. SHRINE: Enabling Nationally Scalable Multi-Site Disease Studies |
title | SHRINE: Enabling Nationally Scalable Multi-Site Disease Studies |
title_full | SHRINE: Enabling Nationally Scalable Multi-Site Disease Studies |
title_fullStr | SHRINE: Enabling Nationally Scalable Multi-Site Disease Studies |
title_full_unstemmed | SHRINE: Enabling Nationally Scalable Multi-Site Disease Studies |
title_short | SHRINE: Enabling Nationally Scalable Multi-Site Disease Studies |
title_sort | shrine: enabling nationally scalable multi-site disease studies |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3591385/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23533569 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0055811 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mcmurryandrewj shrineenablingnationallyscalablemultisitediseasestudies AT murphyshawnn shrineenablingnationallyscalablemultisitediseasestudies AT macfaddendouglas shrineenablingnationallyscalablemultisitediseasestudies AT webergriffin shrineenablingnationallyscalablemultisitediseasestudies AT simonswilliamw shrineenablingnationallyscalablemultisitediseasestudies AT orechiajohn shrineenablingnationallyscalablemultisitediseasestudies AT bickeljonathan shrineenablingnationallyscalablemultisitediseasestudies AT wattanasinnich shrineenablingnationallyscalablemultisitediseasestudies AT gilbertclint shrineenablingnationallyscalablemultisitediseasestudies AT trevvettphilip shrineenablingnationallyscalablemultisitediseasestudies AT churchillsusanne shrineenablingnationallyscalablemultisitediseasestudies AT kohaneisaacs shrineenablingnationallyscalablemultisitediseasestudies |