Cargando…

SHRINE: Enabling Nationally Scalable Multi-Site Disease Studies

Results of medical research studies are often contradictory or cannot be reproduced. One reason is that there may not be enough patient subjects available for observation for a long enough time period. Another reason is that patient populations may vary considerably with respect to geographic and de...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McMurry, Andrew J., Murphy, Shawn N., MacFadden, Douglas, Weber, Griffin, Simons, William W., Orechia, John, Bickel, Jonathan, Wattanasin, Nich, Gilbert, Clint, Trevvett, Philip, Churchill, Susanne, Kohane, Isaac S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3591385/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23533569
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0055811
_version_ 1782262045167583232
author McMurry, Andrew J.
Murphy, Shawn N.
MacFadden, Douglas
Weber, Griffin
Simons, William W.
Orechia, John
Bickel, Jonathan
Wattanasin, Nich
Gilbert, Clint
Trevvett, Philip
Churchill, Susanne
Kohane, Isaac S.
author_facet McMurry, Andrew J.
Murphy, Shawn N.
MacFadden, Douglas
Weber, Griffin
Simons, William W.
Orechia, John
Bickel, Jonathan
Wattanasin, Nich
Gilbert, Clint
Trevvett, Philip
Churchill, Susanne
Kohane, Isaac S.
author_sort McMurry, Andrew J.
collection PubMed
description Results of medical research studies are often contradictory or cannot be reproduced. One reason is that there may not be enough patient subjects available for observation for a long enough time period. Another reason is that patient populations may vary considerably with respect to geographic and demographic boundaries thus limiting how broadly the results apply. Even when similar patient populations are pooled together from multiple locations, differences in medical treatment and record systems can limit which outcome measures can be commonly analyzed. In total, these differences in medical research settings can lead to differing conclusions or can even prevent some studies from starting. We thus sought to create a patient research system that could aggregate as many patient observations as possible from a large number of hospitals in a uniform way. We call this system the ‘Shared Health Research Information Network’, with the following properties: (1) reuse electronic health data from everyday clinical care for research purposes, (2) respect patient privacy and hospital autonomy, (3) aggregate patient populations across many hospitals to achieve statistically significant sample sizes that can be validated independently of a single research setting, (4) harmonize the observation facts recorded at each institution such that queries can be made across many hospitals in parallel, (5) scale to regional and national collaborations. The purpose of this report is to provide open source software for multi-site clinical studies and to report on early uses of this application. At this time SHRINE implementations have been used for multi-site studies of autism co-morbidity, juvenile idiopathic arthritis, peripartum cardiomyopathy, colorectal cancer, diabetes, and others. The wide range of study objectives and growing adoption suggest that SHRINE may be applicable beyond the research uses and participating hospitals named in this report.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3591385
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35913852013-03-26 SHRINE: Enabling Nationally Scalable Multi-Site Disease Studies McMurry, Andrew J. Murphy, Shawn N. MacFadden, Douglas Weber, Griffin Simons, William W. Orechia, John Bickel, Jonathan Wattanasin, Nich Gilbert, Clint Trevvett, Philip Churchill, Susanne Kohane, Isaac S. PLoS One Research Article Results of medical research studies are often contradictory or cannot be reproduced. One reason is that there may not be enough patient subjects available for observation for a long enough time period. Another reason is that patient populations may vary considerably with respect to geographic and demographic boundaries thus limiting how broadly the results apply. Even when similar patient populations are pooled together from multiple locations, differences in medical treatment and record systems can limit which outcome measures can be commonly analyzed. In total, these differences in medical research settings can lead to differing conclusions or can even prevent some studies from starting. We thus sought to create a patient research system that could aggregate as many patient observations as possible from a large number of hospitals in a uniform way. We call this system the ‘Shared Health Research Information Network’, with the following properties: (1) reuse electronic health data from everyday clinical care for research purposes, (2) respect patient privacy and hospital autonomy, (3) aggregate patient populations across many hospitals to achieve statistically significant sample sizes that can be validated independently of a single research setting, (4) harmonize the observation facts recorded at each institution such that queries can be made across many hospitals in parallel, (5) scale to regional and national collaborations. The purpose of this report is to provide open source software for multi-site clinical studies and to report on early uses of this application. At this time SHRINE implementations have been used for multi-site studies of autism co-morbidity, juvenile idiopathic arthritis, peripartum cardiomyopathy, colorectal cancer, diabetes, and others. The wide range of study objectives and growing adoption suggest that SHRINE may be applicable beyond the research uses and participating hospitals named in this report. Public Library of Science 2013-03-07 /pmc/articles/PMC3591385/ /pubmed/23533569 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0055811 Text en © 2013 McMurry et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
McMurry, Andrew J.
Murphy, Shawn N.
MacFadden, Douglas
Weber, Griffin
Simons, William W.
Orechia, John
Bickel, Jonathan
Wattanasin, Nich
Gilbert, Clint
Trevvett, Philip
Churchill, Susanne
Kohane, Isaac S.
SHRINE: Enabling Nationally Scalable Multi-Site Disease Studies
title SHRINE: Enabling Nationally Scalable Multi-Site Disease Studies
title_full SHRINE: Enabling Nationally Scalable Multi-Site Disease Studies
title_fullStr SHRINE: Enabling Nationally Scalable Multi-Site Disease Studies
title_full_unstemmed SHRINE: Enabling Nationally Scalable Multi-Site Disease Studies
title_short SHRINE: Enabling Nationally Scalable Multi-Site Disease Studies
title_sort shrine: enabling nationally scalable multi-site disease studies
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3591385/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23533569
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0055811
work_keys_str_mv AT mcmurryandrewj shrineenablingnationallyscalablemultisitediseasestudies
AT murphyshawnn shrineenablingnationallyscalablemultisitediseasestudies
AT macfaddendouglas shrineenablingnationallyscalablemultisitediseasestudies
AT webergriffin shrineenablingnationallyscalablemultisitediseasestudies
AT simonswilliamw shrineenablingnationallyscalablemultisitediseasestudies
AT orechiajohn shrineenablingnationallyscalablemultisitediseasestudies
AT bickeljonathan shrineenablingnationallyscalablemultisitediseasestudies
AT wattanasinnich shrineenablingnationallyscalablemultisitediseasestudies
AT gilbertclint shrineenablingnationallyscalablemultisitediseasestudies
AT trevvettphilip shrineenablingnationallyscalablemultisitediseasestudies
AT churchillsusanne shrineenablingnationallyscalablemultisitediseasestudies
AT kohaneisaacs shrineenablingnationallyscalablemultisitediseasestudies