Cargando…

Airtraq™ versus Macintoch laryngoscope in intubation performance in the pediatric population

PURPOSE: Airtraq™ is an optical laryngoscope that allows viewing of the vocal cords without a direct line of sight. The main objective of this prospective, randomized, controlled trial was to evaluate Airtraq intubation characteristics, mainly intubation time and cardiovascular changes in the pediat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Riad, Waleed, Moussa, Ashraf, Wong, David T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3591549/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23493430
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1658-354X.105853
_version_ 1782262069586821120
author Riad, Waleed
Moussa, Ashraf
Wong, David T.
author_facet Riad, Waleed
Moussa, Ashraf
Wong, David T.
author_sort Riad, Waleed
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Airtraq™ is an optical laryngoscope that allows viewing of the vocal cords without a direct line of sight. The main objective of this prospective, randomized, controlled trial was to evaluate Airtraq intubation characteristics, mainly intubation time and cardiovascular changes in the pediatric patients. METHODS: Fifty children of American Society of Anesthesiologists class I, 2-10 years of age were divided into 2 groups using sealed envelope technique. Children were premedicated with midazolam. Anesthesia was induced with sevoflurane, fentanyl, and atracurium. Patients were randomly allocated to be intubated with either Airtraq (Airtraq group) or Macintosh laryngoscope (Macintosh group). Intubation time, number of intubation attempts, optimization maneuvers, and ease of intubation were recorded. Hemodynamic variables were recorded before and after anesthetic induction, 1, 3, and 5 min after tracheal intubation. RESULTS: The mean age of children was 6.1 years. Compared with Macintosh group, the use of Airtraq was associated with shorter intubation time (51.6±26.7 s vs 22.8±6.1 s, respectively, P=0.001), less median number of intubation attempts 2 (1-2) versus 1 (1-1), P=0.001), more ease of intubation [2 (1-3) versus 1 (1-1), P=0.001] and less increase in the heart rate 5 min after intubation (P=0.007). No optimization maneuvers required for Airtraq laryngoscope (P=0.001). CONCLUSION: Airtraq decreases intubation time, number of attempts, and optimization maneuvers, less heart rate changes during intubation compared with Macintosh laryngoscope.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3591549
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35915492013-03-14 Airtraq™ versus Macintoch laryngoscope in intubation performance in the pediatric population Riad, Waleed Moussa, Ashraf Wong, David T. Saudi J Anaesth Original Article PURPOSE: Airtraq™ is an optical laryngoscope that allows viewing of the vocal cords without a direct line of sight. The main objective of this prospective, randomized, controlled trial was to evaluate Airtraq intubation characteristics, mainly intubation time and cardiovascular changes in the pediatric patients. METHODS: Fifty children of American Society of Anesthesiologists class I, 2-10 years of age were divided into 2 groups using sealed envelope technique. Children were premedicated with midazolam. Anesthesia was induced with sevoflurane, fentanyl, and atracurium. Patients were randomly allocated to be intubated with either Airtraq (Airtraq group) or Macintosh laryngoscope (Macintosh group). Intubation time, number of intubation attempts, optimization maneuvers, and ease of intubation were recorded. Hemodynamic variables were recorded before and after anesthetic induction, 1, 3, and 5 min after tracheal intubation. RESULTS: The mean age of children was 6.1 years. Compared with Macintosh group, the use of Airtraq was associated with shorter intubation time (51.6±26.7 s vs 22.8±6.1 s, respectively, P=0.001), less median number of intubation attempts 2 (1-2) versus 1 (1-1), P=0.001), more ease of intubation [2 (1-3) versus 1 (1-1), P=0.001] and less increase in the heart rate 5 min after intubation (P=0.007). No optimization maneuvers required for Airtraq laryngoscope (P=0.001). CONCLUSION: Airtraq decreases intubation time, number of attempts, and optimization maneuvers, less heart rate changes during intubation compared with Macintosh laryngoscope. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC3591549/ /pubmed/23493430 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1658-354X.105853 Text en Copyright: © Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Riad, Waleed
Moussa, Ashraf
Wong, David T.
Airtraq™ versus Macintoch laryngoscope in intubation performance in the pediatric population
title Airtraq™ versus Macintoch laryngoscope in intubation performance in the pediatric population
title_full Airtraq™ versus Macintoch laryngoscope in intubation performance in the pediatric population
title_fullStr Airtraq™ versus Macintoch laryngoscope in intubation performance in the pediatric population
title_full_unstemmed Airtraq™ versus Macintoch laryngoscope in intubation performance in the pediatric population
title_short Airtraq™ versus Macintoch laryngoscope in intubation performance in the pediatric population
title_sort airtraq™ versus macintoch laryngoscope in intubation performance in the pediatric population
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3591549/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23493430
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1658-354X.105853
work_keys_str_mv AT riadwaleed airtraqversusmacintochlaryngoscopeinintubationperformanceinthepediatricpopulation
AT moussaashraf airtraqversusmacintochlaryngoscopeinintubationperformanceinthepediatricpopulation
AT wongdavidt airtraqversusmacintochlaryngoscopeinintubationperformanceinthepediatricpopulation