Cargando…
Mechanism of promoter repression by Lac repressor–DNA loops
The Escherichia coli lactose (lac) operon encodes the first genetic switch to be discovered, and lac remains a paradigm for studying negative and positive control of gene expression. Negative control is believed to involve competition of RNA polymerase and Lac repressor for overlapping binding sites...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3592455/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23143103 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gks1011 |
_version_ | 1782262119895400448 |
---|---|
author | Becker, Nicole A. Peters, Justin P. Lionberger, Troy A. Maher, L. James |
author_facet | Becker, Nicole A. Peters, Justin P. Lionberger, Troy A. Maher, L. James |
author_sort | Becker, Nicole A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The Escherichia coli lactose (lac) operon encodes the first genetic switch to be discovered, and lac remains a paradigm for studying negative and positive control of gene expression. Negative control is believed to involve competition of RNA polymerase and Lac repressor for overlapping binding sites. Contributions to the local Lac repressor concentration come from free repressor and repressor delivered to the operator from remote auxiliary operators by DNA looping. Long-standing questions persist concerning the actual role of DNA looping in the mechanism of promoter repression. Here, we use experiments in living bacteria to resolve four of these questions. We show that the distance dependence of repression enhancement is comparable for upstream and downstream auxiliary operators, confirming the hypothesis that repressor concentration increase is the principal mechanism of repression loops. We find that as few as four turns of DNA can be constrained in a stable loop by Lac repressor. We show that RNA polymerase is not trapped at repressed promoters. Finally, we show that constraining a promoter in a tight DNA loop is sufficient for repression even when promoter and operator do not overlap. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3592455 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35924552013-03-08 Mechanism of promoter repression by Lac repressor–DNA loops Becker, Nicole A. Peters, Justin P. Lionberger, Troy A. Maher, L. James Nucleic Acids Res Gene Regulation, Chromatin and Epigenetics The Escherichia coli lactose (lac) operon encodes the first genetic switch to be discovered, and lac remains a paradigm for studying negative and positive control of gene expression. Negative control is believed to involve competition of RNA polymerase and Lac repressor for overlapping binding sites. Contributions to the local Lac repressor concentration come from free repressor and repressor delivered to the operator from remote auxiliary operators by DNA looping. Long-standing questions persist concerning the actual role of DNA looping in the mechanism of promoter repression. Here, we use experiments in living bacteria to resolve four of these questions. We show that the distance dependence of repression enhancement is comparable for upstream and downstream auxiliary operators, confirming the hypothesis that repressor concentration increase is the principal mechanism of repression loops. We find that as few as four turns of DNA can be constrained in a stable loop by Lac repressor. We show that RNA polymerase is not trapped at repressed promoters. Finally, we show that constraining a promoter in a tight DNA loop is sufficient for repression even when promoter and operator do not overlap. Oxford University Press 2013-01 2012-11-07 /pmc/articles/PMC3592455/ /pubmed/23143103 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gks1011 Text en © The Author(s) 2012. Published by Oxford University Press. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/), which permits non-commercial reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com. |
spellingShingle | Gene Regulation, Chromatin and Epigenetics Becker, Nicole A. Peters, Justin P. Lionberger, Troy A. Maher, L. James Mechanism of promoter repression by Lac repressor–DNA loops |
title | Mechanism of promoter repression by Lac repressor–DNA loops |
title_full | Mechanism of promoter repression by Lac repressor–DNA loops |
title_fullStr | Mechanism of promoter repression by Lac repressor–DNA loops |
title_full_unstemmed | Mechanism of promoter repression by Lac repressor–DNA loops |
title_short | Mechanism of promoter repression by Lac repressor–DNA loops |
title_sort | mechanism of promoter repression by lac repressor–dna loops |
topic | Gene Regulation, Chromatin and Epigenetics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3592455/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23143103 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gks1011 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT beckernicolea mechanismofpromoterrepressionbylacrepressordnaloops AT petersjustinp mechanismofpromoterrepressionbylacrepressordnaloops AT lionbergertroya mechanismofpromoterrepressionbylacrepressordnaloops AT maherljames mechanismofpromoterrepressionbylacrepressordnaloops |