Cargando…
A Comparison of Two Programs for the Control of Behavioral Experiments
Two of the most widely used programs for the control of behavioral experiments are Med Associates’ MedState Notation and Coulbourn Instruments’ Graphic State 2. The two systems vary considerably in their approach to programming and data recording, with Graphic State 2 using a point-and-click interfa...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Faculty for Undergraduate Neuroscience
2004
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3592597/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23495298 |
_version_ | 1782262139173470208 |
---|---|
author | Wilson, W. Jeffrey |
author_facet | Wilson, W. Jeffrey |
author_sort | Wilson, W. Jeffrey |
collection | PubMed |
description | Two of the most widely used programs for the control of behavioral experiments are Med Associates’ MedState Notation and Coulbourn Instruments’ Graphic State 2. The two systems vary considerably in their approach to programming and data recording, with Graphic State 2 using a point-and-click interface that appeals to non-programmers while MedState Notation requires the typing of programming code. Graphic State 2 provides many data analysis routines, while MedState Notation allows the user to embed simple data analysis within the behavioral protocol. Graphic State 2 is simpler to use, but MedState Notation is more versatile. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3592597 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2004 |
publisher | Faculty for Undergraduate Neuroscience |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35925972013-03-14 A Comparison of Two Programs for the Control of Behavioral Experiments Wilson, W. Jeffrey J Undergrad Neurosci Educ Media Review Two of the most widely used programs for the control of behavioral experiments are Med Associates’ MedState Notation and Coulbourn Instruments’ Graphic State 2. The two systems vary considerably in their approach to programming and data recording, with Graphic State 2 using a point-and-click interface that appeals to non-programmers while MedState Notation requires the typing of programming code. Graphic State 2 provides many data analysis routines, while MedState Notation allows the user to embed simple data analysis within the behavioral protocol. Graphic State 2 is simpler to use, but MedState Notation is more versatile. Faculty for Undergraduate Neuroscience 2004-06-15 /pmc/articles/PMC3592597/ /pubmed/23495298 Text en Copyright © 2004 Faculty for Undergraduate Neuroscience |
spellingShingle | Media Review Wilson, W. Jeffrey A Comparison of Two Programs for the Control of Behavioral Experiments |
title | A Comparison of Two Programs for the Control of Behavioral Experiments |
title_full | A Comparison of Two Programs for the Control of Behavioral Experiments |
title_fullStr | A Comparison of Two Programs for the Control of Behavioral Experiments |
title_full_unstemmed | A Comparison of Two Programs for the Control of Behavioral Experiments |
title_short | A Comparison of Two Programs for the Control of Behavioral Experiments |
title_sort | comparison of two programs for the control of behavioral experiments |
topic | Media Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3592597/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23495298 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wilsonwjeffrey acomparisonoftwoprogramsforthecontrolofbehavioralexperiments AT wilsonwjeffrey comparisonoftwoprogramsforthecontrolofbehavioralexperiments |