Cargando…

Percutaneous minimally invasive versus open spine surgery in the treatment of fractures of the thoracolumbar junction: a comparative effectiveness review

Study design: Comparative effectiveness review. Objective: To determine the comparative effectiveness and safety of percutaneous minimally invasive versus open spine surgery for fractures of the thoracolumbar junction. Methods: A systematic review of the English-language literature was undertaken fo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Barbagallo, Giuseppe M.V., Yoder, Emily, Dettori, Joseph R., Albanese, Vincenzo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: © AOSpine International 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3592764/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23526905
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0032-1327809
_version_ 1782262177082638336
author Barbagallo, Giuseppe M.V.
Yoder, Emily
Dettori, Joseph R.
Albanese, Vincenzo
author_facet Barbagallo, Giuseppe M.V.
Yoder, Emily
Dettori, Joseph R.
Albanese, Vincenzo
author_sort Barbagallo, Giuseppe M.V.
collection PubMed
description Study design: Comparative effectiveness review. Objective: To determine the comparative effectiveness and safety of percutaneous minimally invasive versus open spine surgery for fractures of the thoracolumbar junction. Methods: A systematic review of the English-language literature was undertaken for articles published between 1970 and March 15, 2012. Reference lists of key articles were also systematically checked. We attempted to identify all articles that reported on the effectiveness and/or safety comparing minimally invasive surgery (MIS) with open surgery for thoracolumbar fractures in the adult population. Articles containing hematological or neoplastic fractures primarily were excluded. Other exclusions included reviews, editorials, case series, non–English-language written studies, and animal studies. We rated the overall body of evidence using a modified Grades of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system for diagnostic and therapeutic studies. Results: • Two studies (Level of Evidence III) met our inclusion criteria. • Radiographic outcomes were similar between treatment groups. • Postoperative incisional pain was less in patients undergoing percutaneous MIS. • Patient function as assessed by the Hannover Spine Score, the SF-36 and the MacNab criteria were slightly higher in the percutaneous minimally invasive group, but not statistically significant. • Percutaneous MIS resulted in less blood loss and shorter length of hospital stay than open surgery. • No complications were reported using percutaneous MIS. Conclusion: Limited data suggest that percutaneous techniques are associated with less postoperative pain, less blood loss, a shorter hospital stay, and a slightly better functional outcome. However, concerns remain on the effectiveness of percutaneous techniques in correcting spinal deformity and achieving bony fusion. Further studies are needed to verify these preliminary findings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3592764
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher © AOSpine International
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35927642013-03-22 Percutaneous minimally invasive versus open spine surgery in the treatment of fractures of the thoracolumbar junction: a comparative effectiveness review Barbagallo, Giuseppe M.V. Yoder, Emily Dettori, Joseph R. Albanese, Vincenzo Evid Based Spine Care J Article Study design: Comparative effectiveness review. Objective: To determine the comparative effectiveness and safety of percutaneous minimally invasive versus open spine surgery for fractures of the thoracolumbar junction. Methods: A systematic review of the English-language literature was undertaken for articles published between 1970 and March 15, 2012. Reference lists of key articles were also systematically checked. We attempted to identify all articles that reported on the effectiveness and/or safety comparing minimally invasive surgery (MIS) with open surgery for thoracolumbar fractures in the adult population. Articles containing hematological or neoplastic fractures primarily were excluded. Other exclusions included reviews, editorials, case series, non–English-language written studies, and animal studies. We rated the overall body of evidence using a modified Grades of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system for diagnostic and therapeutic studies. Results: • Two studies (Level of Evidence III) met our inclusion criteria. • Radiographic outcomes were similar between treatment groups. • Postoperative incisional pain was less in patients undergoing percutaneous MIS. • Patient function as assessed by the Hannover Spine Score, the SF-36 and the MacNab criteria were slightly higher in the percutaneous minimally invasive group, but not statistically significant. • Percutaneous MIS resulted in less blood loss and shorter length of hospital stay than open surgery. • No complications were reported using percutaneous MIS. Conclusion: Limited data suggest that percutaneous techniques are associated with less postoperative pain, less blood loss, a shorter hospital stay, and a slightly better functional outcome. However, concerns remain on the effectiveness of percutaneous techniques in correcting spinal deformity and achieving bony fusion. Further studies are needed to verify these preliminary findings. © AOSpine International 2012-08 /pmc/articles/PMC3592764/ /pubmed/23526905 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0032-1327809 Text en © Thieme Medical Publishers
spellingShingle Article
Barbagallo, Giuseppe M.V.
Yoder, Emily
Dettori, Joseph R.
Albanese, Vincenzo
Percutaneous minimally invasive versus open spine surgery in the treatment of fractures of the thoracolumbar junction: a comparative effectiveness review
title Percutaneous minimally invasive versus open spine surgery in the treatment of fractures of the thoracolumbar junction: a comparative effectiveness review
title_full Percutaneous minimally invasive versus open spine surgery in the treatment of fractures of the thoracolumbar junction: a comparative effectiveness review
title_fullStr Percutaneous minimally invasive versus open spine surgery in the treatment of fractures of the thoracolumbar junction: a comparative effectiveness review
title_full_unstemmed Percutaneous minimally invasive versus open spine surgery in the treatment of fractures of the thoracolumbar junction: a comparative effectiveness review
title_short Percutaneous minimally invasive versus open spine surgery in the treatment of fractures of the thoracolumbar junction: a comparative effectiveness review
title_sort percutaneous minimally invasive versus open spine surgery in the treatment of fractures of the thoracolumbar junction: a comparative effectiveness review
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3592764/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23526905
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0032-1327809
work_keys_str_mv AT barbagallogiuseppemv percutaneousminimallyinvasiveversusopenspinesurgeryinthetreatmentoffracturesofthethoracolumbarjunctionacomparativeeffectivenessreview
AT yoderemily percutaneousminimallyinvasiveversusopenspinesurgeryinthetreatmentoffracturesofthethoracolumbarjunctionacomparativeeffectivenessreview
AT dettorijosephr percutaneousminimallyinvasiveversusopenspinesurgeryinthetreatmentoffracturesofthethoracolumbarjunctionacomparativeeffectivenessreview
AT albanesevincenzo percutaneousminimallyinvasiveversusopenspinesurgeryinthetreatmentoffracturesofthethoracolumbarjunctionacomparativeeffectivenessreview