Cargando…

Patient expectations, outcomes and satisfaction: related, relevant or redundant?

Study design: A prospective case series of patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery. Objective: Is there a correlation between patients' expectations before lumbar surgery, postoperative outcomes, and satisfaction levels? Methods: A prospective study of 145 patients undergoing primary, single-l...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Licina, Paul, Johnston, Michelle, Ewing, Laura, Pearcy, Mark
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: © AOSpine International 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3592768/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23531640
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0032-1328138
_version_ 1782262177982316544
author Licina, Paul
Johnston, Michelle
Ewing, Laura
Pearcy, Mark
author_facet Licina, Paul
Johnston, Michelle
Ewing, Laura
Pearcy, Mark
author_sort Licina, Paul
collection PubMed
description Study design: A prospective case series of patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery. Objective: Is there a correlation between patients' expectations before lumbar surgery, postoperative outcomes, and satisfaction levels? Methods: A prospective study of 145 patients undergoing primary, single-level surgery for degenerative lumbar conditions was conducted. Oswestry Disability Index, back Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and leg VAS were assessed preoperatively and at 6 weeks and 6 months after surgery. Patients' expectations were measured preoperatively by asking them to score the level of pain and disability that would be least acceptable for them to undergo surgery and be satisfied. Satisfaction was assessed 6 weeks postoperatively with a Likert scale. Differences in patient expectations between actual and expected improvements were quantified. Results: Most patients had a clinically relevant improvement, but only about half achieved their expectations. Satisfaction did not correlate with preoperative pain or disability, or with patient expectation of improvement. Instead, satisfaction correlated with positive outcomes. Conclusions: Patient expectations have little bearing on final outcome and satisfaction. [Table: see text]
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3592768
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher © AOSpine International
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35927682013-03-22 Patient expectations, outcomes and satisfaction: related, relevant or redundant? Licina, Paul Johnston, Michelle Ewing, Laura Pearcy, Mark Evid Based Spine Care J Article Study design: A prospective case series of patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery. Objective: Is there a correlation between patients' expectations before lumbar surgery, postoperative outcomes, and satisfaction levels? Methods: A prospective study of 145 patients undergoing primary, single-level surgery for degenerative lumbar conditions was conducted. Oswestry Disability Index, back Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and leg VAS were assessed preoperatively and at 6 weeks and 6 months after surgery. Patients' expectations were measured preoperatively by asking them to score the level of pain and disability that would be least acceptable for them to undergo surgery and be satisfied. Satisfaction was assessed 6 weeks postoperatively with a Likert scale. Differences in patient expectations between actual and expected improvements were quantified. Results: Most patients had a clinically relevant improvement, but only about half achieved their expectations. Satisfaction did not correlate with preoperative pain or disability, or with patient expectation of improvement. Instead, satisfaction correlated with positive outcomes. Conclusions: Patient expectations have little bearing on final outcome and satisfaction. [Table: see text] © AOSpine International 2012-11 /pmc/articles/PMC3592768/ /pubmed/23531640 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0032-1328138 Text en © Thieme Medical Publishers
spellingShingle Article
Licina, Paul
Johnston, Michelle
Ewing, Laura
Pearcy, Mark
Patient expectations, outcomes and satisfaction: related, relevant or redundant?
title Patient expectations, outcomes and satisfaction: related, relevant or redundant?
title_full Patient expectations, outcomes and satisfaction: related, relevant or redundant?
title_fullStr Patient expectations, outcomes and satisfaction: related, relevant or redundant?
title_full_unstemmed Patient expectations, outcomes and satisfaction: related, relevant or redundant?
title_short Patient expectations, outcomes and satisfaction: related, relevant or redundant?
title_sort patient expectations, outcomes and satisfaction: related, relevant or redundant?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3592768/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23531640
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0032-1328138
work_keys_str_mv AT licinapaul patientexpectationsoutcomesandsatisfactionrelatedrelevantorredundant
AT johnstonmichelle patientexpectationsoutcomesandsatisfactionrelatedrelevantorredundant
AT ewinglaura patientexpectationsoutcomesandsatisfactionrelatedrelevantorredundant
AT pearcymark patientexpectationsoutcomesandsatisfactionrelatedrelevantorredundant