Cargando…

Decompression alone versus decompression with limited fusion for treatment of degenerative lumbar scoliosis in the elderly patient

Study design: Retrospective cohort study. Objective: To analyze the surgical results of a group of patients older than 65 years treated for mild degenerative lumbar scoliosis (<30°) with stenosis, treated with decompression alone or decompression and limited fusion. Methods: We evaluated 55 patie...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Daubs, Michael D., Lenke, Lawrence G., Bridwell, Keith H., Cheh, Gene, Kim, Yongjung J., Stobbs, Georgia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: © AOSpine International 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3592774/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23531707
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0032-1328140
_version_ 1782262179332882432
author Daubs, Michael D.
Lenke, Lawrence G.
Bridwell, Keith H.
Cheh, Gene
Kim, Yongjung J.
Stobbs, Georgia
author_facet Daubs, Michael D.
Lenke, Lawrence G.
Bridwell, Keith H.
Cheh, Gene
Kim, Yongjung J.
Stobbs, Georgia
author_sort Daubs, Michael D.
collection PubMed
description Study design: Retrospective cohort study. Objective: To analyze the surgical results of a group of patients older than 65 years treated for mild degenerative lumbar scoliosis (<30°) with stenosis, treated with decompression alone or decompression and limited fusion. Methods: We evaluated 55 patients, all older than 65 years from our prospectively collected database with mild degenerative scoliosis (<30°) and stenosis who underwent surgery. Laminectomy alone was performed in 16 patients, and laminectomy and limited fusion in 39 patients. Mean follow-up was 4.6 years in the decompression group and 5.0 years in the fusion group. Clinical results were graded by patients' self-reported satisfaction and length of symptom-free period to recurrence. Results: In the decompression alone group, 6 (37%) of 16 patients developed recurrent stenosis at the previously decompressed level and five developed recurrence within 6 months postoperatively versus the decompression and fusion group where 3 (8%) of 39 (P = .0476) developed symptomatic stenosis supra adjacent to the fusion. Of 16 patients in the decompression alone group, 12 (75%) had recurrence of symptoms by the 5-year follow-up period versus only 14 (36%) patients in the decompression and fusion group (P = .016). Adjacent segment degenerative changes were common in the fusion group, but only 7% developed symptomatic stenosis. Conclusions: Decompression with limited fusion prevents early return of stenotic symptoms compared with decompression alone in the setting of mild degenerative scoliosis (<30°) and symptomatic stenosis in patients 65 years and older. [Table: see text] The definiton of the different classes of evidence is available on page 67.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3592774
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher © AOSpine International
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35927742013-03-22 Decompression alone versus decompression with limited fusion for treatment of degenerative lumbar scoliosis in the elderly patient Daubs, Michael D. Lenke, Lawrence G. Bridwell, Keith H. Cheh, Gene Kim, Yongjung J. Stobbs, Georgia Evid Based Spine Care J Article Study design: Retrospective cohort study. Objective: To analyze the surgical results of a group of patients older than 65 years treated for mild degenerative lumbar scoliosis (<30°) with stenosis, treated with decompression alone or decompression and limited fusion. Methods: We evaluated 55 patients, all older than 65 years from our prospectively collected database with mild degenerative scoliosis (<30°) and stenosis who underwent surgery. Laminectomy alone was performed in 16 patients, and laminectomy and limited fusion in 39 patients. Mean follow-up was 4.6 years in the decompression group and 5.0 years in the fusion group. Clinical results were graded by patients' self-reported satisfaction and length of symptom-free period to recurrence. Results: In the decompression alone group, 6 (37%) of 16 patients developed recurrent stenosis at the previously decompressed level and five developed recurrence within 6 months postoperatively versus the decompression and fusion group where 3 (8%) of 39 (P = .0476) developed symptomatic stenosis supra adjacent to the fusion. Of 16 patients in the decompression alone group, 12 (75%) had recurrence of symptoms by the 5-year follow-up period versus only 14 (36%) patients in the decompression and fusion group (P = .016). Adjacent segment degenerative changes were common in the fusion group, but only 7% developed symptomatic stenosis. Conclusions: Decompression with limited fusion prevents early return of stenotic symptoms compared with decompression alone in the setting of mild degenerative scoliosis (<30°) and symptomatic stenosis in patients 65 years and older. [Table: see text] The definiton of the different classes of evidence is available on page 67. © AOSpine International 2012-11 /pmc/articles/PMC3592774/ /pubmed/23531707 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0032-1328140 Text en © Thieme Medical Publishers
spellingShingle Article
Daubs, Michael D.
Lenke, Lawrence G.
Bridwell, Keith H.
Cheh, Gene
Kim, Yongjung J.
Stobbs, Georgia
Decompression alone versus decompression with limited fusion for treatment of degenerative lumbar scoliosis in the elderly patient
title Decompression alone versus decompression with limited fusion for treatment of degenerative lumbar scoliosis in the elderly patient
title_full Decompression alone versus decompression with limited fusion for treatment of degenerative lumbar scoliosis in the elderly patient
title_fullStr Decompression alone versus decompression with limited fusion for treatment of degenerative lumbar scoliosis in the elderly patient
title_full_unstemmed Decompression alone versus decompression with limited fusion for treatment of degenerative lumbar scoliosis in the elderly patient
title_short Decompression alone versus decompression with limited fusion for treatment of degenerative lumbar scoliosis in the elderly patient
title_sort decompression alone versus decompression with limited fusion for treatment of degenerative lumbar scoliosis in the elderly patient
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3592774/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23531707
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0032-1328140
work_keys_str_mv AT daubsmichaeld decompressionaloneversusdecompressionwithlimitedfusionfortreatmentofdegenerativelumbarscoliosisintheelderlypatient
AT lenkelawrenceg decompressionaloneversusdecompressionwithlimitedfusionfortreatmentofdegenerativelumbarscoliosisintheelderlypatient
AT bridwellkeithh decompressionaloneversusdecompressionwithlimitedfusionfortreatmentofdegenerativelumbarscoliosisintheelderlypatient
AT chehgene decompressionaloneversusdecompressionwithlimitedfusionfortreatmentofdegenerativelumbarscoliosisintheelderlypatient
AT kimyongjungj decompressionaloneversusdecompressionwithlimitedfusionfortreatmentofdegenerativelumbarscoliosisintheelderlypatient
AT stobbsgeorgia decompressionaloneversusdecompressionwithlimitedfusionfortreatmentofdegenerativelumbarscoliosisintheelderlypatient