Cargando…

The accuracy of the first response histidine-rich protein2 rapid diagnostic test compared with malaria microscopy for guiding field treatment in an outbreak of falciparum malaria

BACKGROUND: Recent WHO guidelines recommended a universal “test and treat” strategy for malaria mainly by use of the rapid diagnostic test (RDT) in all areas. There are concerns about RDT that use the antigen histidine-rich protein2 (HRP2) to detect Plasmodium falciparum, because infection can persi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ghouth, Abdulla Salim Bin, Nasseb, Faraj Mubarak, Al-Kaldy, Khaled Hussin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3593507/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23508787
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2229-5070.97237
_version_ 1782262257511563264
author Ghouth, Abdulla Salim Bin
Nasseb, Faraj Mubarak
Al-Kaldy, Khaled Hussin
author_facet Ghouth, Abdulla Salim Bin
Nasseb, Faraj Mubarak
Al-Kaldy, Khaled Hussin
author_sort Ghouth, Abdulla Salim Bin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Recent WHO guidelines recommended a universal “test and treat” strategy for malaria mainly by use of the rapid diagnostic test (RDT) in all areas. There are concerns about RDT that use the antigen histidine-rich protein2 (HRP2) to detect Plasmodium falciparum, because infection can persist after effective treatment. AIM: The aim of this paper is to describe the accuracy of the first response (HRP2)-RDT compared with malaria microscopy used for guiding the field treatment of patients in an outbreak situation in the Al-Rahabah area in Al-Rydah district in Hadramout/Yemen. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An ad hoc cross sectional survey of all febrile patients in the affected area was conducted in May 2011. The field team was developed including the case management group and the entomology group. The group of case management prepared their plan based on “test and treat” strategy by using First Response Malaria Antigen HRP2 rapid diagnostic test for falciparum malaria, artemsinin-based combination therapy (ACT) according to the national policy of anti-malaria drugs in Yemen were supplied to treat those who were found to be RDT positive in the field; also blood smear films were taken from every patient with fever in order to validate the use of the RDT in the field. Blood film slides prepared and read by skilled lab technicians, the fourth reading was done by one lab expert in the malaria referral lab. RESULTS: The accuracy parameters of HRP2 compared with microscopy are: Sensitivity (74%), specificity (94%). The positive predictive value is 68% and the negative predictive value is 96%. Total agreement is 148/162 (93%) and the overall prevalence is 14%. All the positive malaria cases were of P. falciparum either coming from RDT or microscopy. CONCLUSIONS: HRP2–rapid test is an acceptable test as a guide for field treatment in an outbreak situation where prompt response is indicated. Good prepared blood film slides should be used as it is feasible to evaluate the accuracy of RDTs as a quality control tool.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3593507
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35935072013-03-18 The accuracy of the first response histidine-rich protein2 rapid diagnostic test compared with malaria microscopy for guiding field treatment in an outbreak of falciparum malaria Ghouth, Abdulla Salim Bin Nasseb, Faraj Mubarak Al-Kaldy, Khaled Hussin Trop Parasitol Original Article BACKGROUND: Recent WHO guidelines recommended a universal “test and treat” strategy for malaria mainly by use of the rapid diagnostic test (RDT) in all areas. There are concerns about RDT that use the antigen histidine-rich protein2 (HRP2) to detect Plasmodium falciparum, because infection can persist after effective treatment. AIM: The aim of this paper is to describe the accuracy of the first response (HRP2)-RDT compared with malaria microscopy used for guiding the field treatment of patients in an outbreak situation in the Al-Rahabah area in Al-Rydah district in Hadramout/Yemen. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An ad hoc cross sectional survey of all febrile patients in the affected area was conducted in May 2011. The field team was developed including the case management group and the entomology group. The group of case management prepared their plan based on “test and treat” strategy by using First Response Malaria Antigen HRP2 rapid diagnostic test for falciparum malaria, artemsinin-based combination therapy (ACT) according to the national policy of anti-malaria drugs in Yemen were supplied to treat those who were found to be RDT positive in the field; also blood smear films were taken from every patient with fever in order to validate the use of the RDT in the field. Blood film slides prepared and read by skilled lab technicians, the fourth reading was done by one lab expert in the malaria referral lab. RESULTS: The accuracy parameters of HRP2 compared with microscopy are: Sensitivity (74%), specificity (94%). The positive predictive value is 68% and the negative predictive value is 96%. Total agreement is 148/162 (93%) and the overall prevalence is 14%. All the positive malaria cases were of P. falciparum either coming from RDT or microscopy. CONCLUSIONS: HRP2–rapid test is an acceptable test as a guide for field treatment in an outbreak situation where prompt response is indicated. Good prepared blood film slides should be used as it is feasible to evaluate the accuracy of RDTs as a quality control tool. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC3593507/ /pubmed/23508787 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2229-5070.97237 Text en Copyright: © Tropical Parasitology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Ghouth, Abdulla Salim Bin
Nasseb, Faraj Mubarak
Al-Kaldy, Khaled Hussin
The accuracy of the first response histidine-rich protein2 rapid diagnostic test compared with malaria microscopy for guiding field treatment in an outbreak of falciparum malaria
title The accuracy of the first response histidine-rich protein2 rapid diagnostic test compared with malaria microscopy for guiding field treatment in an outbreak of falciparum malaria
title_full The accuracy of the first response histidine-rich protein2 rapid diagnostic test compared with malaria microscopy for guiding field treatment in an outbreak of falciparum malaria
title_fullStr The accuracy of the first response histidine-rich protein2 rapid diagnostic test compared with malaria microscopy for guiding field treatment in an outbreak of falciparum malaria
title_full_unstemmed The accuracy of the first response histidine-rich protein2 rapid diagnostic test compared with malaria microscopy for guiding field treatment in an outbreak of falciparum malaria
title_short The accuracy of the first response histidine-rich protein2 rapid diagnostic test compared with malaria microscopy for guiding field treatment in an outbreak of falciparum malaria
title_sort accuracy of the first response histidine-rich protein2 rapid diagnostic test compared with malaria microscopy for guiding field treatment in an outbreak of falciparum malaria
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3593507/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23508787
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2229-5070.97237
work_keys_str_mv AT ghouthabdullasalimbin theaccuracyofthefirstresponsehistidinerichprotein2rapiddiagnostictestcomparedwithmalariamicroscopyforguidingfieldtreatmentinanoutbreakoffalciparummalaria
AT nassebfarajmubarak theaccuracyofthefirstresponsehistidinerichprotein2rapiddiagnostictestcomparedwithmalariamicroscopyforguidingfieldtreatmentinanoutbreakoffalciparummalaria
AT alkaldykhaledhussin theaccuracyofthefirstresponsehistidinerichprotein2rapiddiagnostictestcomparedwithmalariamicroscopyforguidingfieldtreatmentinanoutbreakoffalciparummalaria
AT ghouthabdullasalimbin accuracyofthefirstresponsehistidinerichprotein2rapiddiagnostictestcomparedwithmalariamicroscopyforguidingfieldtreatmentinanoutbreakoffalciparummalaria
AT nassebfarajmubarak accuracyofthefirstresponsehistidinerichprotein2rapiddiagnostictestcomparedwithmalariamicroscopyforguidingfieldtreatmentinanoutbreakoffalciparummalaria
AT alkaldykhaledhussin accuracyofthefirstresponsehistidinerichprotein2rapiddiagnostictestcomparedwithmalariamicroscopyforguidingfieldtreatmentinanoutbreakoffalciparummalaria