Cargando…
The accuracy of the first response histidine-rich protein2 rapid diagnostic test compared with malaria microscopy for guiding field treatment in an outbreak of falciparum malaria
BACKGROUND: Recent WHO guidelines recommended a universal “test and treat” strategy for malaria mainly by use of the rapid diagnostic test (RDT) in all areas. There are concerns about RDT that use the antigen histidine-rich protein2 (HRP2) to detect Plasmodium falciparum, because infection can persi...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3593507/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23508787 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2229-5070.97237 |
_version_ | 1782262257511563264 |
---|---|
author | Ghouth, Abdulla Salim Bin Nasseb, Faraj Mubarak Al-Kaldy, Khaled Hussin |
author_facet | Ghouth, Abdulla Salim Bin Nasseb, Faraj Mubarak Al-Kaldy, Khaled Hussin |
author_sort | Ghouth, Abdulla Salim Bin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Recent WHO guidelines recommended a universal “test and treat” strategy for malaria mainly by use of the rapid diagnostic test (RDT) in all areas. There are concerns about RDT that use the antigen histidine-rich protein2 (HRP2) to detect Plasmodium falciparum, because infection can persist after effective treatment. AIM: The aim of this paper is to describe the accuracy of the first response (HRP2)-RDT compared with malaria microscopy used for guiding the field treatment of patients in an outbreak situation in the Al-Rahabah area in Al-Rydah district in Hadramout/Yemen. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An ad hoc cross sectional survey of all febrile patients in the affected area was conducted in May 2011. The field team was developed including the case management group and the entomology group. The group of case management prepared their plan based on “test and treat” strategy by using First Response Malaria Antigen HRP2 rapid diagnostic test for falciparum malaria, artemsinin-based combination therapy (ACT) according to the national policy of anti-malaria drugs in Yemen were supplied to treat those who were found to be RDT positive in the field; also blood smear films were taken from every patient with fever in order to validate the use of the RDT in the field. Blood film slides prepared and read by skilled lab technicians, the fourth reading was done by one lab expert in the malaria referral lab. RESULTS: The accuracy parameters of HRP2 compared with microscopy are: Sensitivity (74%), specificity (94%). The positive predictive value is 68% and the negative predictive value is 96%. Total agreement is 148/162 (93%) and the overall prevalence is 14%. All the positive malaria cases were of P. falciparum either coming from RDT or microscopy. CONCLUSIONS: HRP2–rapid test is an acceptable test as a guide for field treatment in an outbreak situation where prompt response is indicated. Good prepared blood film slides should be used as it is feasible to evaluate the accuracy of RDTs as a quality control tool. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3593507 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35935072013-03-18 The accuracy of the first response histidine-rich protein2 rapid diagnostic test compared with malaria microscopy for guiding field treatment in an outbreak of falciparum malaria Ghouth, Abdulla Salim Bin Nasseb, Faraj Mubarak Al-Kaldy, Khaled Hussin Trop Parasitol Original Article BACKGROUND: Recent WHO guidelines recommended a universal “test and treat” strategy for malaria mainly by use of the rapid diagnostic test (RDT) in all areas. There are concerns about RDT that use the antigen histidine-rich protein2 (HRP2) to detect Plasmodium falciparum, because infection can persist after effective treatment. AIM: The aim of this paper is to describe the accuracy of the first response (HRP2)-RDT compared with malaria microscopy used for guiding the field treatment of patients in an outbreak situation in the Al-Rahabah area in Al-Rydah district in Hadramout/Yemen. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An ad hoc cross sectional survey of all febrile patients in the affected area was conducted in May 2011. The field team was developed including the case management group and the entomology group. The group of case management prepared their plan based on “test and treat” strategy by using First Response Malaria Antigen HRP2 rapid diagnostic test for falciparum malaria, artemsinin-based combination therapy (ACT) according to the national policy of anti-malaria drugs in Yemen were supplied to treat those who were found to be RDT positive in the field; also blood smear films were taken from every patient with fever in order to validate the use of the RDT in the field. Blood film slides prepared and read by skilled lab technicians, the fourth reading was done by one lab expert in the malaria referral lab. RESULTS: The accuracy parameters of HRP2 compared with microscopy are: Sensitivity (74%), specificity (94%). The positive predictive value is 68% and the negative predictive value is 96%. Total agreement is 148/162 (93%) and the overall prevalence is 14%. All the positive malaria cases were of P. falciparum either coming from RDT or microscopy. CONCLUSIONS: HRP2–rapid test is an acceptable test as a guide for field treatment in an outbreak situation where prompt response is indicated. Good prepared blood film slides should be used as it is feasible to evaluate the accuracy of RDTs as a quality control tool. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC3593507/ /pubmed/23508787 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2229-5070.97237 Text en Copyright: © Tropical Parasitology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Ghouth, Abdulla Salim Bin Nasseb, Faraj Mubarak Al-Kaldy, Khaled Hussin The accuracy of the first response histidine-rich protein2 rapid diagnostic test compared with malaria microscopy for guiding field treatment in an outbreak of falciparum malaria |
title | The accuracy of the first response histidine-rich protein2 rapid diagnostic test compared with malaria microscopy for guiding field treatment in an outbreak of falciparum malaria |
title_full | The accuracy of the first response histidine-rich protein2 rapid diagnostic test compared with malaria microscopy for guiding field treatment in an outbreak of falciparum malaria |
title_fullStr | The accuracy of the first response histidine-rich protein2 rapid diagnostic test compared with malaria microscopy for guiding field treatment in an outbreak of falciparum malaria |
title_full_unstemmed | The accuracy of the first response histidine-rich protein2 rapid diagnostic test compared with malaria microscopy for guiding field treatment in an outbreak of falciparum malaria |
title_short | The accuracy of the first response histidine-rich protein2 rapid diagnostic test compared with malaria microscopy for guiding field treatment in an outbreak of falciparum malaria |
title_sort | accuracy of the first response histidine-rich protein2 rapid diagnostic test compared with malaria microscopy for guiding field treatment in an outbreak of falciparum malaria |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3593507/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23508787 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2229-5070.97237 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ghouthabdullasalimbin theaccuracyofthefirstresponsehistidinerichprotein2rapiddiagnostictestcomparedwithmalariamicroscopyforguidingfieldtreatmentinanoutbreakoffalciparummalaria AT nassebfarajmubarak theaccuracyofthefirstresponsehistidinerichprotein2rapiddiagnostictestcomparedwithmalariamicroscopyforguidingfieldtreatmentinanoutbreakoffalciparummalaria AT alkaldykhaledhussin theaccuracyofthefirstresponsehistidinerichprotein2rapiddiagnostictestcomparedwithmalariamicroscopyforguidingfieldtreatmentinanoutbreakoffalciparummalaria AT ghouthabdullasalimbin accuracyofthefirstresponsehistidinerichprotein2rapiddiagnostictestcomparedwithmalariamicroscopyforguidingfieldtreatmentinanoutbreakoffalciparummalaria AT nassebfarajmubarak accuracyofthefirstresponsehistidinerichprotein2rapiddiagnostictestcomparedwithmalariamicroscopyforguidingfieldtreatmentinanoutbreakoffalciparummalaria AT alkaldykhaledhussin accuracyofthefirstresponsehistidinerichprotein2rapiddiagnostictestcomparedwithmalariamicroscopyforguidingfieldtreatmentinanoutbreakoffalciparummalaria |