Cargando…

Management of Deep Brain Stimulator Battery Failure: Battery Estimators, Charge Density, and Importance of Clinical Symptoms

OBJECTIVE: We aimed in this investigation to study deep brain stimulation (DBS) battery drain with special attention directed toward patient symptoms prior to and following battery replacement. BACKGROUND: Previously our group developed web-based calculators and smart phone applications to estimate...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fakhar, Kaihan, Hastings, Erin, Butson, Christopher R., Foote, Kelly D., Zeilman, Pam, Okun, Michael S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3594176/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23536810
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0058665
_version_ 1782262296623448064
author Fakhar, Kaihan
Hastings, Erin
Butson, Christopher R.
Foote, Kelly D.
Zeilman, Pam
Okun, Michael S.
author_facet Fakhar, Kaihan
Hastings, Erin
Butson, Christopher R.
Foote, Kelly D.
Zeilman, Pam
Okun, Michael S.
author_sort Fakhar, Kaihan
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: We aimed in this investigation to study deep brain stimulation (DBS) battery drain with special attention directed toward patient symptoms prior to and following battery replacement. BACKGROUND: Previously our group developed web-based calculators and smart phone applications to estimate DBS battery life (http://mdc.mbi.ufl.edu/surgery/dbs-battery-estimator). METHODS: A cohort of 320 patients undergoing DBS battery replacement from 2002–2012 were included in an IRB approved study. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 20.0 (IBM, Armonk, NY). RESULTS: The mean charge density for treatment of Parkinson’s disease was 7.2 µC/cm(2)/phase (SD = 3.82), for dystonia was 17.5 µC/cm(2)/phase (SD = 8.53), for essential tremor was 8.3 µC/cm(2)/phase (SD = 4.85), and for OCD was 18.0 µC/cm(2)/phase (SD = 4.35). There was a significant relationship between charge density and battery life (r = −.59, p<.001), as well as total power and battery life (r = −.64, p<.001). The UF estimator (r = .67, p<.001) and the Medtronic helpline (r = .74, p<.001) predictions of battery life were significantly positively associated with actual battery life. Battery status indicators on Soletra and Kinetra were poor predictors of battery life. In 38 cases, the symptoms improved following a battery change, suggesting that the neurostimulator was likely responsible for symptom worsening. For these cases, both the UF estimator and the Medtronic helpline were significantly correlated with battery life (r = .65 and r = .70, respectively, both p<.001). CONCLUSIONS: Battery estimations, charge density, total power and clinical symptoms were important factors. The observation of clinical worsening that was rescued following neurostimulator replacement reinforces the notion that changes in clinical symptoms can be associated with battery drain.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3594176
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35941762013-03-27 Management of Deep Brain Stimulator Battery Failure: Battery Estimators, Charge Density, and Importance of Clinical Symptoms Fakhar, Kaihan Hastings, Erin Butson, Christopher R. Foote, Kelly D. Zeilman, Pam Okun, Michael S. PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: We aimed in this investigation to study deep brain stimulation (DBS) battery drain with special attention directed toward patient symptoms prior to and following battery replacement. BACKGROUND: Previously our group developed web-based calculators and smart phone applications to estimate DBS battery life (http://mdc.mbi.ufl.edu/surgery/dbs-battery-estimator). METHODS: A cohort of 320 patients undergoing DBS battery replacement from 2002–2012 were included in an IRB approved study. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 20.0 (IBM, Armonk, NY). RESULTS: The mean charge density for treatment of Parkinson’s disease was 7.2 µC/cm(2)/phase (SD = 3.82), for dystonia was 17.5 µC/cm(2)/phase (SD = 8.53), for essential tremor was 8.3 µC/cm(2)/phase (SD = 4.85), and for OCD was 18.0 µC/cm(2)/phase (SD = 4.35). There was a significant relationship between charge density and battery life (r = −.59, p<.001), as well as total power and battery life (r = −.64, p<.001). The UF estimator (r = .67, p<.001) and the Medtronic helpline (r = .74, p<.001) predictions of battery life were significantly positively associated with actual battery life. Battery status indicators on Soletra and Kinetra were poor predictors of battery life. In 38 cases, the symptoms improved following a battery change, suggesting that the neurostimulator was likely responsible for symptom worsening. For these cases, both the UF estimator and the Medtronic helpline were significantly correlated with battery life (r = .65 and r = .70, respectively, both p<.001). CONCLUSIONS: Battery estimations, charge density, total power and clinical symptoms were important factors. The observation of clinical worsening that was rescued following neurostimulator replacement reinforces the notion that changes in clinical symptoms can be associated with battery drain. Public Library of Science 2013-03-11 /pmc/articles/PMC3594176/ /pubmed/23536810 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0058665 Text en © 2013 Fakhar et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Fakhar, Kaihan
Hastings, Erin
Butson, Christopher R.
Foote, Kelly D.
Zeilman, Pam
Okun, Michael S.
Management of Deep Brain Stimulator Battery Failure: Battery Estimators, Charge Density, and Importance of Clinical Symptoms
title Management of Deep Brain Stimulator Battery Failure: Battery Estimators, Charge Density, and Importance of Clinical Symptoms
title_full Management of Deep Brain Stimulator Battery Failure: Battery Estimators, Charge Density, and Importance of Clinical Symptoms
title_fullStr Management of Deep Brain Stimulator Battery Failure: Battery Estimators, Charge Density, and Importance of Clinical Symptoms
title_full_unstemmed Management of Deep Brain Stimulator Battery Failure: Battery Estimators, Charge Density, and Importance of Clinical Symptoms
title_short Management of Deep Brain Stimulator Battery Failure: Battery Estimators, Charge Density, and Importance of Clinical Symptoms
title_sort management of deep brain stimulator battery failure: battery estimators, charge density, and importance of clinical symptoms
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3594176/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23536810
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0058665
work_keys_str_mv AT fakharkaihan managementofdeepbrainstimulatorbatteryfailurebatteryestimatorschargedensityandimportanceofclinicalsymptoms
AT hastingserin managementofdeepbrainstimulatorbatteryfailurebatteryestimatorschargedensityandimportanceofclinicalsymptoms
AT butsonchristopherr managementofdeepbrainstimulatorbatteryfailurebatteryestimatorschargedensityandimportanceofclinicalsymptoms
AT footekellyd managementofdeepbrainstimulatorbatteryfailurebatteryestimatorschargedensityandimportanceofclinicalsymptoms
AT zeilmanpam managementofdeepbrainstimulatorbatteryfailurebatteryestimatorschargedensityandimportanceofclinicalsymptoms
AT okunmichaels managementofdeepbrainstimulatorbatteryfailurebatteryestimatorschargedensityandimportanceofclinicalsymptoms