Cargando…

Gene Frequency Distributions Reject a Neutral Model of Genome Evolution

Evolution of prokaryotes involves extensive loss and gain of genes, which lead to substantial differences in the gene repertoires even among closely related organisms. Through a wide range of phylogenetic depths, gene frequency distributions in prokaryotic pangenomes bear a characteristic, asymmetri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lobkovsky, Alexander E., Wolf, Yuri I., Koonin, Eugene V.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3595032/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23315380
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gbe/evt002
_version_ 1782262375509917696
author Lobkovsky, Alexander E.
Wolf, Yuri I.
Koonin, Eugene V.
author_facet Lobkovsky, Alexander E.
Wolf, Yuri I.
Koonin, Eugene V.
author_sort Lobkovsky, Alexander E.
collection PubMed
description Evolution of prokaryotes involves extensive loss and gain of genes, which lead to substantial differences in the gene repertoires even among closely related organisms. Through a wide range of phylogenetic depths, gene frequency distributions in prokaryotic pangenomes bear a characteristic, asymmetrical U-shape, with a core of (nearly) universal genes, a “shell” of moderately common genes, and a “cloud” of rare genes. We employ mathematical modeling to investigate evolutionary processes that might underlie this universal pattern. Gene frequency distributions for almost 400 groups of 10 bacterial or archaeal species each over a broad range of evolutionary distances were fit to steady-state, infinite allele models based on the distribution of gene replacement rates and the phylogenetic tree relating the species in each group. The fits of the theoretical frequency distributions to the empirical ones yield model parameters and estimates of the goodness of fit. Using the Akaike Information Criterion, we show that the neutral model of genome evolution, with the same replacement rate for all genes, can be confidently rejected. Of the three tested models with purifying selection, the one in which the distribution of replacement rates is derived from a stochastic population model with additive per-gene fitness yields the best fits to the data. The selection strength estimated from the fits declines with evolutionary divergence while staying well outside the neutral regime. These findings indicate that, unlike some other universal distributions of genomic variables, for example, the distribution of paralogous gene family membership, the gene frequency distribution is substantially affected by selection.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3595032
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35950322013-03-12 Gene Frequency Distributions Reject a Neutral Model of Genome Evolution Lobkovsky, Alexander E. Wolf, Yuri I. Koonin, Eugene V. Genome Biol Evol Research Article Evolution of prokaryotes involves extensive loss and gain of genes, which lead to substantial differences in the gene repertoires even among closely related organisms. Through a wide range of phylogenetic depths, gene frequency distributions in prokaryotic pangenomes bear a characteristic, asymmetrical U-shape, with a core of (nearly) universal genes, a “shell” of moderately common genes, and a “cloud” of rare genes. We employ mathematical modeling to investigate evolutionary processes that might underlie this universal pattern. Gene frequency distributions for almost 400 groups of 10 bacterial or archaeal species each over a broad range of evolutionary distances were fit to steady-state, infinite allele models based on the distribution of gene replacement rates and the phylogenetic tree relating the species in each group. The fits of the theoretical frequency distributions to the empirical ones yield model parameters and estimates of the goodness of fit. Using the Akaike Information Criterion, we show that the neutral model of genome evolution, with the same replacement rate for all genes, can be confidently rejected. Of the three tested models with purifying selection, the one in which the distribution of replacement rates is derived from a stochastic population model with additive per-gene fitness yields the best fits to the data. The selection strength estimated from the fits declines with evolutionary divergence while staying well outside the neutral regime. These findings indicate that, unlike some other universal distributions of genomic variables, for example, the distribution of paralogous gene family membership, the gene frequency distribution is substantially affected by selection. Oxford University Press 2013 2013-01-11 /pmc/articles/PMC3595032/ /pubmed/23315380 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gbe/evt002 Text en Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution 2013. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lobkovsky, Alexander E.
Wolf, Yuri I.
Koonin, Eugene V.
Gene Frequency Distributions Reject a Neutral Model of Genome Evolution
title Gene Frequency Distributions Reject a Neutral Model of Genome Evolution
title_full Gene Frequency Distributions Reject a Neutral Model of Genome Evolution
title_fullStr Gene Frequency Distributions Reject a Neutral Model of Genome Evolution
title_full_unstemmed Gene Frequency Distributions Reject a Neutral Model of Genome Evolution
title_short Gene Frequency Distributions Reject a Neutral Model of Genome Evolution
title_sort gene frequency distributions reject a neutral model of genome evolution
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3595032/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23315380
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gbe/evt002
work_keys_str_mv AT lobkovskyalexandere genefrequencydistributionsrejectaneutralmodelofgenomeevolution
AT wolfyurii genefrequencydistributionsrejectaneutralmodelofgenomeevolution
AT koonineugenev genefrequencydistributionsrejectaneutralmodelofgenomeevolution