Cargando…
A Checklist to Improve Patient Safety in Interventional Radiology
PURPOSE: To develop a specific RADiological Patient Safety System (RADPASS) checklist for interventional radiology and to assess the effect of this checklist on health care processes of radiological interventions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: On the basis of available literature and expert opinion, a prot...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer-Verlag
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3595473/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22562482 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00270-012-0395-z |
_version_ | 1782262414964686848 |
---|---|
author | Koetser, Inge C. J. de Vries, Eefje N. van Delden, Otto M. Smorenburg, Susanne M. Boermeester, Marja A. van Lienden, Krijn P. |
author_facet | Koetser, Inge C. J. de Vries, Eefje N. van Delden, Otto M. Smorenburg, Susanne M. Boermeester, Marja A. van Lienden, Krijn P. |
author_sort | Koetser, Inge C. J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To develop a specific RADiological Patient Safety System (RADPASS) checklist for interventional radiology and to assess the effect of this checklist on health care processes of radiological interventions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: On the basis of available literature and expert opinion, a prototype checklist was developed. The checklist was adapted on the basis of observation of daily practice in a tertiary referral centre and evaluation by users. To assess the effect of RADPASS, in a series of radiological interventions, all deviations from optimal care were registered before and after implementation of the checklist. In addition, the checklist and its use were evaluated by interviewing all users. RESULTS: The RADPASS checklist has two parts: A (Planning and Preparation) and B (Procedure). The latter part comprises checks just before starting a procedure (B1) and checks concerning the postprocedural care immediately after completion of the procedure (B2). Two cohorts of, respectively, 94 and 101 radiological interventions were observed; the mean percentage of deviations of the optimal process per intervention decreased from 24 % before implementation to 5 % after implementation (p < 0.001). Postponements and cancellations of interventions decreased from 10 % before implementation to 0 % after implementation. Most users agreed that the checklist was user-friendly and increased patient safety awareness and efficiency. CONCLUSION: The first validated patient safety checklist for interventional radiology was developed. The use of the RADPASS checklist reduced deviations from the optimal process by three quarters and was associated with less procedure postponements. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3595473 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Springer-Verlag |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35954732013-03-13 A Checklist to Improve Patient Safety in Interventional Radiology Koetser, Inge C. J. de Vries, Eefje N. van Delden, Otto M. Smorenburg, Susanne M. Boermeester, Marja A. van Lienden, Krijn P. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol Clinical Investigation PURPOSE: To develop a specific RADiological Patient Safety System (RADPASS) checklist for interventional radiology and to assess the effect of this checklist on health care processes of radiological interventions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: On the basis of available literature and expert opinion, a prototype checklist was developed. The checklist was adapted on the basis of observation of daily practice in a tertiary referral centre and evaluation by users. To assess the effect of RADPASS, in a series of radiological interventions, all deviations from optimal care were registered before and after implementation of the checklist. In addition, the checklist and its use were evaluated by interviewing all users. RESULTS: The RADPASS checklist has two parts: A (Planning and Preparation) and B (Procedure). The latter part comprises checks just before starting a procedure (B1) and checks concerning the postprocedural care immediately after completion of the procedure (B2). Two cohorts of, respectively, 94 and 101 radiological interventions were observed; the mean percentage of deviations of the optimal process per intervention decreased from 24 % before implementation to 5 % after implementation (p < 0.001). Postponements and cancellations of interventions decreased from 10 % before implementation to 0 % after implementation. Most users agreed that the checklist was user-friendly and increased patient safety awareness and efficiency. CONCLUSION: The first validated patient safety checklist for interventional radiology was developed. The use of the RADPASS checklist reduced deviations from the optimal process by three quarters and was associated with less procedure postponements. Springer-Verlag 2012-05-05 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC3595473/ /pubmed/22562482 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00270-012-0395-z Text en © The Author(s) 2012 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Investigation Koetser, Inge C. J. de Vries, Eefje N. van Delden, Otto M. Smorenburg, Susanne M. Boermeester, Marja A. van Lienden, Krijn P. A Checklist to Improve Patient Safety in Interventional Radiology |
title | A Checklist to Improve Patient Safety in Interventional Radiology |
title_full | A Checklist to Improve Patient Safety in Interventional Radiology |
title_fullStr | A Checklist to Improve Patient Safety in Interventional Radiology |
title_full_unstemmed | A Checklist to Improve Patient Safety in Interventional Radiology |
title_short | A Checklist to Improve Patient Safety in Interventional Radiology |
title_sort | checklist to improve patient safety in interventional radiology |
topic | Clinical Investigation |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3595473/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22562482 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00270-012-0395-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT koetseringecj achecklisttoimprovepatientsafetyininterventionalradiology AT devrieseefjen achecklisttoimprovepatientsafetyininterventionalradiology AT vandeldenottom achecklisttoimprovepatientsafetyininterventionalradiology AT smorenburgsusannem achecklisttoimprovepatientsafetyininterventionalradiology AT boermeestermarjaa achecklisttoimprovepatientsafetyininterventionalradiology AT vanliendenkrijnp achecklisttoimprovepatientsafetyininterventionalradiology AT koetseringecj checklisttoimprovepatientsafetyininterventionalradiology AT devrieseefjen checklisttoimprovepatientsafetyininterventionalradiology AT vandeldenottom checklisttoimprovepatientsafetyininterventionalradiology AT smorenburgsusannem checklisttoimprovepatientsafetyininterventionalradiology AT boermeestermarjaa checklisttoimprovepatientsafetyininterventionalradiology AT vanliendenkrijnp checklisttoimprovepatientsafetyininterventionalradiology |