Cargando…

A Checklist to Improve Patient Safety in Interventional Radiology

PURPOSE: To develop a specific RADiological Patient Safety System (RADPASS) checklist for interventional radiology and to assess the effect of this checklist on health care processes of radiological interventions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: On the basis of available literature and expert opinion, a prot...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Koetser, Inge C. J., de Vries, Eefje N., van Delden, Otto M., Smorenburg, Susanne M., Boermeester, Marja A., van Lienden, Krijn P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3595473/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22562482
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00270-012-0395-z
_version_ 1782262414964686848
author Koetser, Inge C. J.
de Vries, Eefje N.
van Delden, Otto M.
Smorenburg, Susanne M.
Boermeester, Marja A.
van Lienden, Krijn P.
author_facet Koetser, Inge C. J.
de Vries, Eefje N.
van Delden, Otto M.
Smorenburg, Susanne M.
Boermeester, Marja A.
van Lienden, Krijn P.
author_sort Koetser, Inge C. J.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To develop a specific RADiological Patient Safety System (RADPASS) checklist for interventional radiology and to assess the effect of this checklist on health care processes of radiological interventions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: On the basis of available literature and expert opinion, a prototype checklist was developed. The checklist was adapted on the basis of observation of daily practice in a tertiary referral centre and evaluation by users. To assess the effect of RADPASS, in a series of radiological interventions, all deviations from optimal care were registered before and after implementation of the checklist. In addition, the checklist and its use were evaluated by interviewing all users. RESULTS: The RADPASS checklist has two parts: A (Planning and Preparation) and B (Procedure). The latter part comprises checks just before starting a procedure (B1) and checks concerning the postprocedural care immediately after completion of the procedure (B2). Two cohorts of, respectively, 94 and 101 radiological interventions were observed; the mean percentage of deviations of the optimal process per intervention decreased from 24 % before implementation to 5 % after implementation (p < 0.001). Postponements and cancellations of interventions decreased from 10 % before implementation to 0 % after implementation. Most users agreed that the checklist was user-friendly and increased patient safety awareness and efficiency. CONCLUSION: The first validated patient safety checklist for interventional radiology was developed. The use of the RADPASS checklist reduced deviations from the optimal process by three quarters and was associated with less procedure postponements.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3595473
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35954732013-03-13 A Checklist to Improve Patient Safety in Interventional Radiology Koetser, Inge C. J. de Vries, Eefje N. van Delden, Otto M. Smorenburg, Susanne M. Boermeester, Marja A. van Lienden, Krijn P. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol Clinical Investigation PURPOSE: To develop a specific RADiological Patient Safety System (RADPASS) checklist for interventional radiology and to assess the effect of this checklist on health care processes of radiological interventions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: On the basis of available literature and expert opinion, a prototype checklist was developed. The checklist was adapted on the basis of observation of daily practice in a tertiary referral centre and evaluation by users. To assess the effect of RADPASS, in a series of radiological interventions, all deviations from optimal care were registered before and after implementation of the checklist. In addition, the checklist and its use were evaluated by interviewing all users. RESULTS: The RADPASS checklist has two parts: A (Planning and Preparation) and B (Procedure). The latter part comprises checks just before starting a procedure (B1) and checks concerning the postprocedural care immediately after completion of the procedure (B2). Two cohorts of, respectively, 94 and 101 radiological interventions were observed; the mean percentage of deviations of the optimal process per intervention decreased from 24 % before implementation to 5 % after implementation (p < 0.001). Postponements and cancellations of interventions decreased from 10 % before implementation to 0 % after implementation. Most users agreed that the checklist was user-friendly and increased patient safety awareness and efficiency. CONCLUSION: The first validated patient safety checklist for interventional radiology was developed. The use of the RADPASS checklist reduced deviations from the optimal process by three quarters and was associated with less procedure postponements. Springer-Verlag 2012-05-05 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC3595473/ /pubmed/22562482 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00270-012-0395-z Text en © The Author(s) 2012 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Clinical Investigation
Koetser, Inge C. J.
de Vries, Eefje N.
van Delden, Otto M.
Smorenburg, Susanne M.
Boermeester, Marja A.
van Lienden, Krijn P.
A Checklist to Improve Patient Safety in Interventional Radiology
title A Checklist to Improve Patient Safety in Interventional Radiology
title_full A Checklist to Improve Patient Safety in Interventional Radiology
title_fullStr A Checklist to Improve Patient Safety in Interventional Radiology
title_full_unstemmed A Checklist to Improve Patient Safety in Interventional Radiology
title_short A Checklist to Improve Patient Safety in Interventional Radiology
title_sort checklist to improve patient safety in interventional radiology
topic Clinical Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3595473/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22562482
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00270-012-0395-z
work_keys_str_mv AT koetseringecj achecklisttoimprovepatientsafetyininterventionalradiology
AT devrieseefjen achecklisttoimprovepatientsafetyininterventionalradiology
AT vandeldenottom achecklisttoimprovepatientsafetyininterventionalradiology
AT smorenburgsusannem achecklisttoimprovepatientsafetyininterventionalradiology
AT boermeestermarjaa achecklisttoimprovepatientsafetyininterventionalradiology
AT vanliendenkrijnp achecklisttoimprovepatientsafetyininterventionalradiology
AT koetseringecj checklisttoimprovepatientsafetyininterventionalradiology
AT devrieseefjen checklisttoimprovepatientsafetyininterventionalradiology
AT vandeldenottom checklisttoimprovepatientsafetyininterventionalradiology
AT smorenburgsusannem checklisttoimprovepatientsafetyininterventionalradiology
AT boermeestermarjaa checklisttoimprovepatientsafetyininterventionalradiology
AT vanliendenkrijnp checklisttoimprovepatientsafetyininterventionalradiology