Cargando…

A Budget Impact Model for Paclitaxel-eluting Stent in Femoropopliteal Disease in France

PURPOSE: The Zilver PTX drug-eluting stent (Cook Ireland Ltd., Limerick, Ireland) represents an advance in endovascular treatments for atherosclerotic superficial femoral artery (SFA) disease. Clinical data demonstrate improved clinical outcomes compared to bare-metal stents (BMS). This analysis ass...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: De Cock, Erwin, Sapoval, Marc, Julia, Pierre, de Lissovoy, Greg, Lopes, Sandra
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3595477/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23073560
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00270-012-0494-x
_version_ 1782262415935668224
author De Cock, Erwin
Sapoval, Marc
Julia, Pierre
de Lissovoy, Greg
Lopes, Sandra
author_facet De Cock, Erwin
Sapoval, Marc
Julia, Pierre
de Lissovoy, Greg
Lopes, Sandra
author_sort De Cock, Erwin
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The Zilver PTX drug-eluting stent (Cook Ireland Ltd., Limerick, Ireland) represents an advance in endovascular treatments for atherosclerotic superficial femoral artery (SFA) disease. Clinical data demonstrate improved clinical outcomes compared to bare-metal stents (BMS). This analysis assessed the likely impact on the French public health care budget of introducing reimbursement for the Zilver PTX stent. METHODS: A model was developed in Microsoft Excel to estimate the impact of a progressive transition from BMS to Zilver PTX over a 5-year horizon. The number of patients undergoing SFA stenting was estimated on the basis of hospital episode data. The analysis from the payer perspective used French reimbursement tariffs. Target lesion revascularization (TLR) after primary stent placement was the primary outcome. TLR rates were based on 2-year data from the Zilver PTX single-arm study (6 and 9 %) and BMS rates reported in the literature (average 16 and 22 %) and extrapolated to 5 years. Net budget impact was expressed as the difference in total costs (primary stenting and reinterventions) for a scenario where BMS is progressively replaced by Zilver PTX compared to a scenario of BMS only. RESULTS: The model estimated a net cumulative 5-year budget reduction of €6,807,202 for a projected population of 82,316 patients (21,361 receiving Zilver PTX). Base case results were confirmed in sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSION: Adoption of Zilver PTX could lead to important savings for the French public health care payer. Despite higher initial reimbursement for the Zilver PTX stent, fewer expected SFA reinterventions after the primary stenting procedure result in net savings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3595477
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35954772013-03-13 A Budget Impact Model for Paclitaxel-eluting Stent in Femoropopliteal Disease in France De Cock, Erwin Sapoval, Marc Julia, Pierre de Lissovoy, Greg Lopes, Sandra Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol Clinical Investigation PURPOSE: The Zilver PTX drug-eluting stent (Cook Ireland Ltd., Limerick, Ireland) represents an advance in endovascular treatments for atherosclerotic superficial femoral artery (SFA) disease. Clinical data demonstrate improved clinical outcomes compared to bare-metal stents (BMS). This analysis assessed the likely impact on the French public health care budget of introducing reimbursement for the Zilver PTX stent. METHODS: A model was developed in Microsoft Excel to estimate the impact of a progressive transition from BMS to Zilver PTX over a 5-year horizon. The number of patients undergoing SFA stenting was estimated on the basis of hospital episode data. The analysis from the payer perspective used French reimbursement tariffs. Target lesion revascularization (TLR) after primary stent placement was the primary outcome. TLR rates were based on 2-year data from the Zilver PTX single-arm study (6 and 9 %) and BMS rates reported in the literature (average 16 and 22 %) and extrapolated to 5 years. Net budget impact was expressed as the difference in total costs (primary stenting and reinterventions) for a scenario where BMS is progressively replaced by Zilver PTX compared to a scenario of BMS only. RESULTS: The model estimated a net cumulative 5-year budget reduction of €6,807,202 for a projected population of 82,316 patients (21,361 receiving Zilver PTX). Base case results were confirmed in sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSION: Adoption of Zilver PTX could lead to important savings for the French public health care payer. Despite higher initial reimbursement for the Zilver PTX stent, fewer expected SFA reinterventions after the primary stenting procedure result in net savings. Springer-Verlag 2012-10-17 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC3595477/ /pubmed/23073560 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00270-012-0494-x Text en © The Author(s) 2012 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Clinical Investigation
De Cock, Erwin
Sapoval, Marc
Julia, Pierre
de Lissovoy, Greg
Lopes, Sandra
A Budget Impact Model for Paclitaxel-eluting Stent in Femoropopliteal Disease in France
title A Budget Impact Model for Paclitaxel-eluting Stent in Femoropopliteal Disease in France
title_full A Budget Impact Model for Paclitaxel-eluting Stent in Femoropopliteal Disease in France
title_fullStr A Budget Impact Model for Paclitaxel-eluting Stent in Femoropopliteal Disease in France
title_full_unstemmed A Budget Impact Model for Paclitaxel-eluting Stent in Femoropopliteal Disease in France
title_short A Budget Impact Model for Paclitaxel-eluting Stent in Femoropopliteal Disease in France
title_sort budget impact model for paclitaxel-eluting stent in femoropopliteal disease in france
topic Clinical Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3595477/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23073560
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00270-012-0494-x
work_keys_str_mv AT decockerwin abudgetimpactmodelforpaclitaxelelutingstentinfemoropoplitealdiseaseinfrance
AT sapovalmarc abudgetimpactmodelforpaclitaxelelutingstentinfemoropoplitealdiseaseinfrance
AT juliapierre abudgetimpactmodelforpaclitaxelelutingstentinfemoropoplitealdiseaseinfrance
AT delissovoygreg abudgetimpactmodelforpaclitaxelelutingstentinfemoropoplitealdiseaseinfrance
AT lopessandra abudgetimpactmodelforpaclitaxelelutingstentinfemoropoplitealdiseaseinfrance
AT decockerwin budgetimpactmodelforpaclitaxelelutingstentinfemoropoplitealdiseaseinfrance
AT sapovalmarc budgetimpactmodelforpaclitaxelelutingstentinfemoropoplitealdiseaseinfrance
AT juliapierre budgetimpactmodelforpaclitaxelelutingstentinfemoropoplitealdiseaseinfrance
AT delissovoygreg budgetimpactmodelforpaclitaxelelutingstentinfemoropoplitealdiseaseinfrance
AT lopessandra budgetimpactmodelforpaclitaxelelutingstentinfemoropoplitealdiseaseinfrance