Cargando…
Surgical Repair of Leaking Filtering Blebs Using Two Different Techniques
PURPOSE: To report the outcomes of two different surgical techniques for the repair of late onset bleb leakage following trabeculectomy. METHODS: This retrospective study includes 21 eyes of 20 patients with prior trabeculectomy and late-onset bleb leaks; 14 eyes underwent excision of the filtering...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Ophthalmic Research Center
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3595588/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23503604 |
_version_ | 1782262426176061440 |
---|---|
author | Melo, António B. Razeghinejad, M. Reza Palejwala, Neal Myers, Jonathan S. Moster, Marlene R. Spaeth, George L. Katz, L. Jay |
author_facet | Melo, António B. Razeghinejad, M. Reza Palejwala, Neal Myers, Jonathan S. Moster, Marlene R. Spaeth, George L. Katz, L. Jay |
author_sort | Melo, António B. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To report the outcomes of two different surgical techniques for the repair of late onset bleb leakage following trabeculectomy. METHODS: This retrospective study includes 21 eyes of 20 patients with prior trabeculectomy and late-onset bleb leaks; 14 eyes underwent excision of the filtering bleb together with conjunctival advancement while in the other 7 eyes the bleb was retained but de-epithelialized before conjunctival advancement. Success was defined as resolution of leakage with no need for additional glaucoma surgery together with intraocular pressure (IOP) of 5-21 mmHg. Complete and qualified success was considered when the above mentioned was achieved without or with glaucoma medications, respectively. RESULTS: Mean duration of follow-up was 20.3±14.4 months. No significant difference was observed between the two groups in terms of complete, qualified and overall success rates (P>0.05), however more antiglaucoma medications were necessary in the bleb excision group (P=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Both surgical techniques of bleb repair were comparably effective, however the bleb de-epithelialization technique was associated with less need for glaucoma medications after the procedure. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3595588 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Ophthalmic Research Center |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35955882013-03-15 Surgical Repair of Leaking Filtering Blebs Using Two Different Techniques Melo, António B. Razeghinejad, M. Reza Palejwala, Neal Myers, Jonathan S. Moster, Marlene R. Spaeth, George L. Katz, L. Jay J Ophthalmic Vis Res Original Article PURPOSE: To report the outcomes of two different surgical techniques for the repair of late onset bleb leakage following trabeculectomy. METHODS: This retrospective study includes 21 eyes of 20 patients with prior trabeculectomy and late-onset bleb leaks; 14 eyes underwent excision of the filtering bleb together with conjunctival advancement while in the other 7 eyes the bleb was retained but de-epithelialized before conjunctival advancement. Success was defined as resolution of leakage with no need for additional glaucoma surgery together with intraocular pressure (IOP) of 5-21 mmHg. Complete and qualified success was considered when the above mentioned was achieved without or with glaucoma medications, respectively. RESULTS: Mean duration of follow-up was 20.3±14.4 months. No significant difference was observed between the two groups in terms of complete, qualified and overall success rates (P>0.05), however more antiglaucoma medications were necessary in the bleb excision group (P=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Both surgical techniques of bleb repair were comparably effective, however the bleb de-epithelialization technique was associated with less need for glaucoma medications after the procedure. Ophthalmic Research Center 2012-10 /pmc/articles/PMC3595588/ /pubmed/23503604 Text en © 2012 Ophthalmic Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Melo, António B. Razeghinejad, M. Reza Palejwala, Neal Myers, Jonathan S. Moster, Marlene R. Spaeth, George L. Katz, L. Jay Surgical Repair of Leaking Filtering Blebs Using Two Different Techniques |
title | Surgical Repair of Leaking Filtering Blebs Using Two Different Techniques |
title_full | Surgical Repair of Leaking Filtering Blebs Using Two Different Techniques |
title_fullStr | Surgical Repair of Leaking Filtering Blebs Using Two Different Techniques |
title_full_unstemmed | Surgical Repair of Leaking Filtering Blebs Using Two Different Techniques |
title_short | Surgical Repair of Leaking Filtering Blebs Using Two Different Techniques |
title_sort | surgical repair of leaking filtering blebs using two different techniques |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3595588/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23503604 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT meloantoniob surgicalrepairofleakingfilteringblebsusingtwodifferenttechniques AT razeghinejadmreza surgicalrepairofleakingfilteringblebsusingtwodifferenttechniques AT palejwalaneal surgicalrepairofleakingfilteringblebsusingtwodifferenttechniques AT myersjonathans surgicalrepairofleakingfilteringblebsusingtwodifferenttechniques AT mostermarlener surgicalrepairofleakingfilteringblebsusingtwodifferenttechniques AT spaethgeorgel surgicalrepairofleakingfilteringblebsusingtwodifferenttechniques AT katzljay surgicalrepairofleakingfilteringblebsusingtwodifferenttechniques |