Cargando…

The IVF Outcome Counseling Based on the Model Combining DHEAS and Age in Patients with Low AMH Prior to the First Cycle of GnRH Antagonist Protocol of Ovarian Stimulation

Objective. To investigate the endocrine and/or clinical characteristics of women with low anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) that could improve the accuracy of IVF outcome prediction based on the female age alone prior to the first GnRH antagonist IVF cycle. Methods. Medical records of 129 patients with l...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alebić, Miro Šimun, Stojanović, Nataša, Žuvić-Butorac, Marta
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3595671/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23509455
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/637919
_version_ 1782262439208812544
author Alebić, Miro Šimun
Stojanović, Nataša
Žuvić-Butorac, Marta
author_facet Alebić, Miro Šimun
Stojanović, Nataša
Žuvić-Butorac, Marta
author_sort Alebić, Miro Šimun
collection PubMed
description Objective. To investigate the endocrine and/or clinical characteristics of women with low anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) that could improve the accuracy of IVF outcome prediction based on the female age alone prior to the first GnRH antagonist IVF cycle. Methods. Medical records of 129 patients with low AMH level (<6.5 pmol/L) who underwent their first GnRH antagonist ovarian stimulation protocol for IVF/ICSI were retrospectively analyzed. The main outcome measure was the area under the ROC curve (AUC-ROC) for the models combining age and other potential predictive factors for the clinical pregnancy. Results. Clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) per initiated cycles was 11.6%. For the prediction of clinical pregnancy, DHEAS and age showed AUC-ROC of 0.726 (95%CI 0.641–0.801) and 0.662 (95%CI 0.573–0.743), respectively (P = 0.522). The predictive accuracy of the model combining age and DHEAS (AUC-ROC 0.796; 95%CI 0.716–0.862) was significantly higher compared to that of age alone (P = 0.013). In patients <37.5 years with DHEAS >5.7 pmol/L, 60% (9/15) of all pregnancies were achieved with CPR of 37.5%. Conclusions. DHEAS appears to be predictive for clinical pregnancy in younger women (<37.5 years) with low AMH after the first GnRH antagonist IVF cycle. Therefore, DHEAS-age model could refine the pretreatment counseling on pregnancy prospects following IVF.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3595671
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35956712013-03-18 The IVF Outcome Counseling Based on the Model Combining DHEAS and Age in Patients with Low AMH Prior to the First Cycle of GnRH Antagonist Protocol of Ovarian Stimulation Alebić, Miro Šimun Stojanović, Nataša Žuvić-Butorac, Marta Int J Endocrinol Research Article Objective. To investigate the endocrine and/or clinical characteristics of women with low anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) that could improve the accuracy of IVF outcome prediction based on the female age alone prior to the first GnRH antagonist IVF cycle. Methods. Medical records of 129 patients with low AMH level (<6.5 pmol/L) who underwent their first GnRH antagonist ovarian stimulation protocol for IVF/ICSI were retrospectively analyzed. The main outcome measure was the area under the ROC curve (AUC-ROC) for the models combining age and other potential predictive factors for the clinical pregnancy. Results. Clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) per initiated cycles was 11.6%. For the prediction of clinical pregnancy, DHEAS and age showed AUC-ROC of 0.726 (95%CI 0.641–0.801) and 0.662 (95%CI 0.573–0.743), respectively (P = 0.522). The predictive accuracy of the model combining age and DHEAS (AUC-ROC 0.796; 95%CI 0.716–0.862) was significantly higher compared to that of age alone (P = 0.013). In patients <37.5 years with DHEAS >5.7 pmol/L, 60% (9/15) of all pregnancies were achieved with CPR of 37.5%. Conclusions. DHEAS appears to be predictive for clinical pregnancy in younger women (<37.5 years) with low AMH after the first GnRH antagonist IVF cycle. Therefore, DHEAS-age model could refine the pretreatment counseling on pregnancy prospects following IVF. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013 2013-02-24 /pmc/articles/PMC3595671/ /pubmed/23509455 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/637919 Text en Copyright © 2013 Miro Šimun Alebić et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Alebić, Miro Šimun
Stojanović, Nataša
Žuvić-Butorac, Marta
The IVF Outcome Counseling Based on the Model Combining DHEAS and Age in Patients with Low AMH Prior to the First Cycle of GnRH Antagonist Protocol of Ovarian Stimulation
title The IVF Outcome Counseling Based on the Model Combining DHEAS and Age in Patients with Low AMH Prior to the First Cycle of GnRH Antagonist Protocol of Ovarian Stimulation
title_full The IVF Outcome Counseling Based on the Model Combining DHEAS and Age in Patients with Low AMH Prior to the First Cycle of GnRH Antagonist Protocol of Ovarian Stimulation
title_fullStr The IVF Outcome Counseling Based on the Model Combining DHEAS and Age in Patients with Low AMH Prior to the First Cycle of GnRH Antagonist Protocol of Ovarian Stimulation
title_full_unstemmed The IVF Outcome Counseling Based on the Model Combining DHEAS and Age in Patients with Low AMH Prior to the First Cycle of GnRH Antagonist Protocol of Ovarian Stimulation
title_short The IVF Outcome Counseling Based on the Model Combining DHEAS and Age in Patients with Low AMH Prior to the First Cycle of GnRH Antagonist Protocol of Ovarian Stimulation
title_sort ivf outcome counseling based on the model combining dheas and age in patients with low amh prior to the first cycle of gnrh antagonist protocol of ovarian stimulation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3595671/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23509455
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/637919
work_keys_str_mv AT alebicmirosimun theivfoutcomecounselingbasedonthemodelcombiningdheasandageinpatientswithlowamhpriortothefirstcycleofgnrhantagonistprotocolofovarianstimulation
AT stojanovicnatasa theivfoutcomecounselingbasedonthemodelcombiningdheasandageinpatientswithlowamhpriortothefirstcycleofgnrhantagonistprotocolofovarianstimulation
AT zuvicbutoracmarta theivfoutcomecounselingbasedonthemodelcombiningdheasandageinpatientswithlowamhpriortothefirstcycleofgnrhantagonistprotocolofovarianstimulation
AT alebicmirosimun ivfoutcomecounselingbasedonthemodelcombiningdheasandageinpatientswithlowamhpriortothefirstcycleofgnrhantagonistprotocolofovarianstimulation
AT stojanovicnatasa ivfoutcomecounselingbasedonthemodelcombiningdheasandageinpatientswithlowamhpriortothefirstcycleofgnrhantagonistprotocolofovarianstimulation
AT zuvicbutoracmarta ivfoutcomecounselingbasedonthemodelcombiningdheasandageinpatientswithlowamhpriortothefirstcycleofgnrhantagonistprotocolofovarianstimulation