Cargando…

Do High Frequency Ultrasound Images Support Clinical Skin Assessment?

High frequency ultrasound imaging has been reported as a potential method of identifying the suspected tissue damage in patients “at risk” of pressure ulceration. The aim of this study was to explore whether ultrasound images supported the clinical skin assessment in an inpatient population through...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Porter-Armstrong, Alison P., Adams, Catherine, Moorhead, Anne S., Donnelly, Jeannie, Nixon, Jane, Bader, Daniel L., Lyder, Courtney, Stinson, May D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3595707/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23509637
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/314248
_version_ 1782262447463202816
author Porter-Armstrong, Alison P.
Adams, Catherine
Moorhead, Anne S.
Donnelly, Jeannie
Nixon, Jane
Bader, Daniel L.
Lyder, Courtney
Stinson, May D.
author_facet Porter-Armstrong, Alison P.
Adams, Catherine
Moorhead, Anne S.
Donnelly, Jeannie
Nixon, Jane
Bader, Daniel L.
Lyder, Courtney
Stinson, May D.
author_sort Porter-Armstrong, Alison P.
collection PubMed
description High frequency ultrasound imaging has been reported as a potential method of identifying the suspected tissue damage in patients “at risk” of pressure ulceration. The aim of this study was to explore whether ultrasound images supported the clinical skin assessment in an inpatient population through identification of subcutaneous tissue damage. Skin on the heels and/or sacral coccygeal area of fifty vascular surgery inpatients was assessed clinically by tissue viability nurses and with ultrasound pre operatively and at least every other day until discharge. Images were compared to routine clinical skin assessment outcomes. Qualitative classification of ultrasound images did not match outcomes yielded through the clinical skin assessment. Images corresponding to 16 participants were classified as subgroup 3 damage at the heels (equivalent to grade 2 pressure ulceration); clinical skin assessment rated no heels as greater than grade 1a (blanching erythema). Conversely, all images captured of the sacral coccygeal area were classified as normal; the clinical skin assessment rated two participants as grade 1b (non-blanching erythema). Ultrasound imaging is a potentially useful adjunct to the clinical skin assessment in providing information about the underlying tissue. However, further longitudinal clinical assessment is required to characterise images against actual and “staged” pressure ulceration.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3595707
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35957072013-03-18 Do High Frequency Ultrasound Images Support Clinical Skin Assessment? Porter-Armstrong, Alison P. Adams, Catherine Moorhead, Anne S. Donnelly, Jeannie Nixon, Jane Bader, Daniel L. Lyder, Courtney Stinson, May D. ISRN Nurs Clinical Study High frequency ultrasound imaging has been reported as a potential method of identifying the suspected tissue damage in patients “at risk” of pressure ulceration. The aim of this study was to explore whether ultrasound images supported the clinical skin assessment in an inpatient population through identification of subcutaneous tissue damage. Skin on the heels and/or sacral coccygeal area of fifty vascular surgery inpatients was assessed clinically by tissue viability nurses and with ultrasound pre operatively and at least every other day until discharge. Images were compared to routine clinical skin assessment outcomes. Qualitative classification of ultrasound images did not match outcomes yielded through the clinical skin assessment. Images corresponding to 16 participants were classified as subgroup 3 damage at the heels (equivalent to grade 2 pressure ulceration); clinical skin assessment rated no heels as greater than grade 1a (blanching erythema). Conversely, all images captured of the sacral coccygeal area were classified as normal; the clinical skin assessment rated two participants as grade 1b (non-blanching erythema). Ultrasound imaging is a potentially useful adjunct to the clinical skin assessment in providing information about the underlying tissue. However, further longitudinal clinical assessment is required to characterise images against actual and “staged” pressure ulceration. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013-02-21 /pmc/articles/PMC3595707/ /pubmed/23509637 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/314248 Text en Copyright © 2013 Alison P. Porter-Armstrong et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Porter-Armstrong, Alison P.
Adams, Catherine
Moorhead, Anne S.
Donnelly, Jeannie
Nixon, Jane
Bader, Daniel L.
Lyder, Courtney
Stinson, May D.
Do High Frequency Ultrasound Images Support Clinical Skin Assessment?
title Do High Frequency Ultrasound Images Support Clinical Skin Assessment?
title_full Do High Frequency Ultrasound Images Support Clinical Skin Assessment?
title_fullStr Do High Frequency Ultrasound Images Support Clinical Skin Assessment?
title_full_unstemmed Do High Frequency Ultrasound Images Support Clinical Skin Assessment?
title_short Do High Frequency Ultrasound Images Support Clinical Skin Assessment?
title_sort do high frequency ultrasound images support clinical skin assessment?
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3595707/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23509637
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/314248
work_keys_str_mv AT porterarmstrongalisonp dohighfrequencyultrasoundimagessupportclinicalskinassessment
AT adamscatherine dohighfrequencyultrasoundimagessupportclinicalskinassessment
AT moorheadannes dohighfrequencyultrasoundimagessupportclinicalskinassessment
AT donnellyjeannie dohighfrequencyultrasoundimagessupportclinicalskinassessment
AT nixonjane dohighfrequencyultrasoundimagessupportclinicalskinassessment
AT baderdaniell dohighfrequencyultrasoundimagessupportclinicalskinassessment
AT lydercourtney dohighfrequencyultrasoundimagessupportclinicalskinassessment
AT stinsonmayd dohighfrequencyultrasoundimagessupportclinicalskinassessment