Cargando…
Do High Frequency Ultrasound Images Support Clinical Skin Assessment?
High frequency ultrasound imaging has been reported as a potential method of identifying the suspected tissue damage in patients “at risk” of pressure ulceration. The aim of this study was to explore whether ultrasound images supported the clinical skin assessment in an inpatient population through...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3595707/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23509637 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/314248 |
_version_ | 1782262447463202816 |
---|---|
author | Porter-Armstrong, Alison P. Adams, Catherine Moorhead, Anne S. Donnelly, Jeannie Nixon, Jane Bader, Daniel L. Lyder, Courtney Stinson, May D. |
author_facet | Porter-Armstrong, Alison P. Adams, Catherine Moorhead, Anne S. Donnelly, Jeannie Nixon, Jane Bader, Daniel L. Lyder, Courtney Stinson, May D. |
author_sort | Porter-Armstrong, Alison P. |
collection | PubMed |
description | High frequency ultrasound imaging has been reported as a potential method of identifying the suspected tissue damage in patients “at risk” of pressure ulceration. The aim of this study was to explore whether ultrasound images supported the clinical skin assessment in an inpatient population through identification of subcutaneous tissue damage. Skin on the heels and/or sacral coccygeal area of fifty vascular surgery inpatients was assessed clinically by tissue viability nurses and with ultrasound pre operatively and at least every other day until discharge. Images were compared to routine clinical skin assessment outcomes. Qualitative classification of ultrasound images did not match outcomes yielded through the clinical skin assessment. Images corresponding to 16 participants were classified as subgroup 3 damage at the heels (equivalent to grade 2 pressure ulceration); clinical skin assessment rated no heels as greater than grade 1a (blanching erythema). Conversely, all images captured of the sacral coccygeal area were classified as normal; the clinical skin assessment rated two participants as grade 1b (non-blanching erythema). Ultrasound imaging is a potentially useful adjunct to the clinical skin assessment in providing information about the underlying tissue. However, further longitudinal clinical assessment is required to characterise images against actual and “staged” pressure ulceration. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3595707 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35957072013-03-18 Do High Frequency Ultrasound Images Support Clinical Skin Assessment? Porter-Armstrong, Alison P. Adams, Catherine Moorhead, Anne S. Donnelly, Jeannie Nixon, Jane Bader, Daniel L. Lyder, Courtney Stinson, May D. ISRN Nurs Clinical Study High frequency ultrasound imaging has been reported as a potential method of identifying the suspected tissue damage in patients “at risk” of pressure ulceration. The aim of this study was to explore whether ultrasound images supported the clinical skin assessment in an inpatient population through identification of subcutaneous tissue damage. Skin on the heels and/or sacral coccygeal area of fifty vascular surgery inpatients was assessed clinically by tissue viability nurses and with ultrasound pre operatively and at least every other day until discharge. Images were compared to routine clinical skin assessment outcomes. Qualitative classification of ultrasound images did not match outcomes yielded through the clinical skin assessment. Images corresponding to 16 participants were classified as subgroup 3 damage at the heels (equivalent to grade 2 pressure ulceration); clinical skin assessment rated no heels as greater than grade 1a (blanching erythema). Conversely, all images captured of the sacral coccygeal area were classified as normal; the clinical skin assessment rated two participants as grade 1b (non-blanching erythema). Ultrasound imaging is a potentially useful adjunct to the clinical skin assessment in providing information about the underlying tissue. However, further longitudinal clinical assessment is required to characterise images against actual and “staged” pressure ulceration. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013-02-21 /pmc/articles/PMC3595707/ /pubmed/23509637 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/314248 Text en Copyright © 2013 Alison P. Porter-Armstrong et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Study Porter-Armstrong, Alison P. Adams, Catherine Moorhead, Anne S. Donnelly, Jeannie Nixon, Jane Bader, Daniel L. Lyder, Courtney Stinson, May D. Do High Frequency Ultrasound Images Support Clinical Skin Assessment? |
title | Do High Frequency Ultrasound Images Support Clinical Skin Assessment? |
title_full | Do High Frequency Ultrasound Images Support Clinical Skin Assessment? |
title_fullStr | Do High Frequency Ultrasound Images Support Clinical Skin Assessment? |
title_full_unstemmed | Do High Frequency Ultrasound Images Support Clinical Skin Assessment? |
title_short | Do High Frequency Ultrasound Images Support Clinical Skin Assessment? |
title_sort | do high frequency ultrasound images support clinical skin assessment? |
topic | Clinical Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3595707/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23509637 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/314248 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT porterarmstrongalisonp dohighfrequencyultrasoundimagessupportclinicalskinassessment AT adamscatherine dohighfrequencyultrasoundimagessupportclinicalskinassessment AT moorheadannes dohighfrequencyultrasoundimagessupportclinicalskinassessment AT donnellyjeannie dohighfrequencyultrasoundimagessupportclinicalskinassessment AT nixonjane dohighfrequencyultrasoundimagessupportclinicalskinassessment AT baderdaniell dohighfrequencyultrasoundimagessupportclinicalskinassessment AT lydercourtney dohighfrequencyultrasoundimagessupportclinicalskinassessment AT stinsonmayd dohighfrequencyultrasoundimagessupportclinicalskinassessment |