Cargando…
A critical exploration of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) framework from the perspective of oncology: recommendations for revision
BACKGROUND: In 2001, the World Health Organization developed the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) framework in an effort to attend to the multidimensional health-related concerns of individuals. Historically, although the ICF has frequently been used in a reh...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3596126/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23526147 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S40020 |
_version_ | 1782262468592009216 |
---|---|
author | Bornbaum, Catherine C Doyle, Philip C Skarakis-Doyle, Elizabeth Theurer, Julie A |
author_facet | Bornbaum, Catherine C Doyle, Philip C Skarakis-Doyle, Elizabeth Theurer, Julie A |
author_sort | Bornbaum, Catherine C |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In 2001, the World Health Organization developed the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) framework in an effort to attend to the multidimensional health-related concerns of individuals. Historically, although the ICF has frequently been used in a rehabilitation-based context, the World Health Organization has positioned it as a universal framework of health and its related states. Consequently, the ICF has been utilized for a diverse array of purposes in the field of oncology, including: evaluating functioning in individuals with cancer, guiding assessment in oncology rehabilitation, assessing the comprehensiveness of outcome measures utilized in oncology research, assisting in health-related quality of life instrument selection, and comparing the primary concerns of health professionals with those of their patients. DISCUSSION: Examination of the ICF through the lens of cancer care highlights the fact that this framework can be a valuable tool to facilitate comprehensive care in oncology, but it currently possesses some areas of limitation that require conceptual revision; to this end, several recommendations have been proposed. Specifically, these proposed recommendations center on the following three areas of the ICF framework: (1) the replacement of the term “health condition” with the more inclusive and dynamic term “health state;” (2) the continuing development and refinement of the personal factors component to ensure issues such as comorbidities can be accounted for appropriately; and (3) the inclusion of a mechanism to account for the subjective dimension of health and functioning (eg, quality of life). SUMMARY: It is through the expansion of these conceptual parameters that the ICF may become more relevant and applicable to the field of oncology. With these important revisions, the ICF has the potential to provide a broader biopsychosocial perspective of care that captures the diverse range of concerns that arise throughout the continuum of care in oncology. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3596126 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35961262013-03-22 A critical exploration of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) framework from the perspective of oncology: recommendations for revision Bornbaum, Catherine C Doyle, Philip C Skarakis-Doyle, Elizabeth Theurer, Julie A J Multidiscip Healthc Review BACKGROUND: In 2001, the World Health Organization developed the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) framework in an effort to attend to the multidimensional health-related concerns of individuals. Historically, although the ICF has frequently been used in a rehabilitation-based context, the World Health Organization has positioned it as a universal framework of health and its related states. Consequently, the ICF has been utilized for a diverse array of purposes in the field of oncology, including: evaluating functioning in individuals with cancer, guiding assessment in oncology rehabilitation, assessing the comprehensiveness of outcome measures utilized in oncology research, assisting in health-related quality of life instrument selection, and comparing the primary concerns of health professionals with those of their patients. DISCUSSION: Examination of the ICF through the lens of cancer care highlights the fact that this framework can be a valuable tool to facilitate comprehensive care in oncology, but it currently possesses some areas of limitation that require conceptual revision; to this end, several recommendations have been proposed. Specifically, these proposed recommendations center on the following three areas of the ICF framework: (1) the replacement of the term “health condition” with the more inclusive and dynamic term “health state;” (2) the continuing development and refinement of the personal factors component to ensure issues such as comorbidities can be accounted for appropriately; and (3) the inclusion of a mechanism to account for the subjective dimension of health and functioning (eg, quality of life). SUMMARY: It is through the expansion of these conceptual parameters that the ICF may become more relevant and applicable to the field of oncology. With these important revisions, the ICF has the potential to provide a broader biopsychosocial perspective of care that captures the diverse range of concerns that arise throughout the continuum of care in oncology. Dove Medical Press 2013-03-08 /pmc/articles/PMC3596126/ /pubmed/23526147 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S40020 Text en © 2013 Bornbaum et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Bornbaum, Catherine C Doyle, Philip C Skarakis-Doyle, Elizabeth Theurer, Julie A A critical exploration of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) framework from the perspective of oncology: recommendations for revision |
title | A critical exploration of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) framework from the perspective of oncology: recommendations for revision |
title_full | A critical exploration of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) framework from the perspective of oncology: recommendations for revision |
title_fullStr | A critical exploration of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) framework from the perspective of oncology: recommendations for revision |
title_full_unstemmed | A critical exploration of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) framework from the perspective of oncology: recommendations for revision |
title_short | A critical exploration of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) framework from the perspective of oncology: recommendations for revision |
title_sort | critical exploration of the international classification of functioning, disability, and health (icf) framework from the perspective of oncology: recommendations for revision |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3596126/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23526147 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S40020 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bornbaumcatherinec acriticalexplorationoftheinternationalclassificationoffunctioningdisabilityandhealthicfframeworkfromtheperspectiveofoncologyrecommendationsforrevision AT doylephilipc acriticalexplorationoftheinternationalclassificationoffunctioningdisabilityandhealthicfframeworkfromtheperspectiveofoncologyrecommendationsforrevision AT skarakisdoyleelizabeth acriticalexplorationoftheinternationalclassificationoffunctioningdisabilityandhealthicfframeworkfromtheperspectiveofoncologyrecommendationsforrevision AT theurerjuliea acriticalexplorationoftheinternationalclassificationoffunctioningdisabilityandhealthicfframeworkfromtheperspectiveofoncologyrecommendationsforrevision AT bornbaumcatherinec criticalexplorationoftheinternationalclassificationoffunctioningdisabilityandhealthicfframeworkfromtheperspectiveofoncologyrecommendationsforrevision AT doylephilipc criticalexplorationoftheinternationalclassificationoffunctioningdisabilityandhealthicfframeworkfromtheperspectiveofoncologyrecommendationsforrevision AT skarakisdoyleelizabeth criticalexplorationoftheinternationalclassificationoffunctioningdisabilityandhealthicfframeworkfromtheperspectiveofoncologyrecommendationsforrevision AT theurerjuliea criticalexplorationoftheinternationalclassificationoffunctioningdisabilityandhealthicfframeworkfromtheperspectiveofoncologyrecommendationsforrevision |