Cargando…

Hypofractionated external-beam radiation therapy (HEBRT) versus conventional external-beam radiation (CEBRT) in patients with localized prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this work was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of all randomized controlled trials comparing the efficacy and side effect profile of hypofractionated versus conventional external-beam radiation therapy for prostate cancer. METHODS: Several databases were se...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Botrel, Tobias Engel Ayer, Clark, Otávio, Pompeo, Antônio Carlos Lima, Bretas, Francisco Flávio Horta, Sadi, Marcus Vinicius, Ferreira, Ubirajara, dos Reis, Rodolfo Borges
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3596128/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23526383
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CE.S41178
_version_ 1782262469043945472
author Botrel, Tobias Engel Ayer
Clark, Otávio
Pompeo, Antônio Carlos Lima
Bretas, Francisco Flávio Horta
Sadi, Marcus Vinicius
Ferreira, Ubirajara
dos Reis, Rodolfo Borges
author_facet Botrel, Tobias Engel Ayer
Clark, Otávio
Pompeo, Antônio Carlos Lima
Bretas, Francisco Flávio Horta
Sadi, Marcus Vinicius
Ferreira, Ubirajara
dos Reis, Rodolfo Borges
author_sort Botrel, Tobias Engel Ayer
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The purpose of this work was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of all randomized controlled trials comparing the efficacy and side effect profile of hypofractionated versus conventional external-beam radiation therapy for prostate cancer. METHODS: Several databases were searched, including Medline, EmBase, LiLACS, and Central. The endpoints were freedom from biochemical failure and side effects. We performed a meta-analysis of the published data. The results are expressed as the hazard ratio (HR) or risk ratio (RR), with the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: The final analysis included nine trials comprising 2702 patients. Freedom from biochemical failure was reported in only three studies and was similar in patients who received hypofractionated or conventional radiotherapy (fixed effect, HR 1.03, 95% CI 0.88–1.20; P = 0.75), with heterogeneity [χ(2) = 15.32, df = 2 (P = 0.0005); I2 = 87%]. The incidence of acute adverse gastrointestinal events was higher in the hypofractionated group (fixed effect, RR 2.02, 95% CI 1.45–2.81; P < 0.0001). We also found moderate heterogeneity on this analysis [χ(2) = 7.47, df = 5 (P = 0.19); I2 = 33%]. Acute genitourinary toxicity was similar among the groups (fixed effect, RR 1.19, 95% CI 0.95–1.49; P = 0.13), with moderate heterogeneity [χ(2) = 5.83, df = 4 (P = 0.21); I2 = 31%]. The incidence of all late adverse events was the same in both groups (fixed effect, gastrointestinal toxicity, RR 1.17, 95% CI 0.79–1.72, P = 0.44; and acute genitourinary toxicity, RR 1.16, 95% CI 0.80–1.68, P = 0.44). CONCLUSION: Hypofractionated radiotherapy in localized prostate cancer was not superior to conventional radiotherapy and showed higher acute gastrointestinal toxicity in this meta-analysis. Because the number of published studies is still small, future assessments should be conducted to clarify better the true role of hypofractionated radiotherapy in patients with prostate cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3596128
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35961282013-03-22 Hypofractionated external-beam radiation therapy (HEBRT) versus conventional external-beam radiation (CEBRT) in patients with localized prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis Botrel, Tobias Engel Ayer Clark, Otávio Pompeo, Antônio Carlos Lima Bretas, Francisco Flávio Horta Sadi, Marcus Vinicius Ferreira, Ubirajara dos Reis, Rodolfo Borges Core Evid Original Research BACKGROUND: The purpose of this work was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of all randomized controlled trials comparing the efficacy and side effect profile of hypofractionated versus conventional external-beam radiation therapy for prostate cancer. METHODS: Several databases were searched, including Medline, EmBase, LiLACS, and Central. The endpoints were freedom from biochemical failure and side effects. We performed a meta-analysis of the published data. The results are expressed as the hazard ratio (HR) or risk ratio (RR), with the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: The final analysis included nine trials comprising 2702 patients. Freedom from biochemical failure was reported in only three studies and was similar in patients who received hypofractionated or conventional radiotherapy (fixed effect, HR 1.03, 95% CI 0.88–1.20; P = 0.75), with heterogeneity [χ(2) = 15.32, df = 2 (P = 0.0005); I2 = 87%]. The incidence of acute adverse gastrointestinal events was higher in the hypofractionated group (fixed effect, RR 2.02, 95% CI 1.45–2.81; P < 0.0001). We also found moderate heterogeneity on this analysis [χ(2) = 7.47, df = 5 (P = 0.19); I2 = 33%]. Acute genitourinary toxicity was similar among the groups (fixed effect, RR 1.19, 95% CI 0.95–1.49; P = 0.13), with moderate heterogeneity [χ(2) = 5.83, df = 4 (P = 0.21); I2 = 31%]. The incidence of all late adverse events was the same in both groups (fixed effect, gastrointestinal toxicity, RR 1.17, 95% CI 0.79–1.72, P = 0.44; and acute genitourinary toxicity, RR 1.16, 95% CI 0.80–1.68, P = 0.44). CONCLUSION: Hypofractionated radiotherapy in localized prostate cancer was not superior to conventional radiotherapy and showed higher acute gastrointestinal toxicity in this meta-analysis. Because the number of published studies is still small, future assessments should be conducted to clarify better the true role of hypofractionated radiotherapy in patients with prostate cancer. Dove Medical Press 2013 2013-03-07 /pmc/articles/PMC3596128/ /pubmed/23526383 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CE.S41178 Text en © 2013 Botrel et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Botrel, Tobias Engel Ayer
Clark, Otávio
Pompeo, Antônio Carlos Lima
Bretas, Francisco Flávio Horta
Sadi, Marcus Vinicius
Ferreira, Ubirajara
dos Reis, Rodolfo Borges
Hypofractionated external-beam radiation therapy (HEBRT) versus conventional external-beam radiation (CEBRT) in patients with localized prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Hypofractionated external-beam radiation therapy (HEBRT) versus conventional external-beam radiation (CEBRT) in patients with localized prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Hypofractionated external-beam radiation therapy (HEBRT) versus conventional external-beam radiation (CEBRT) in patients with localized prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Hypofractionated external-beam radiation therapy (HEBRT) versus conventional external-beam radiation (CEBRT) in patients with localized prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Hypofractionated external-beam radiation therapy (HEBRT) versus conventional external-beam radiation (CEBRT) in patients with localized prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Hypofractionated external-beam radiation therapy (HEBRT) versus conventional external-beam radiation (CEBRT) in patients with localized prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort hypofractionated external-beam radiation therapy (hebrt) versus conventional external-beam radiation (cebrt) in patients with localized prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3596128/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23526383
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CE.S41178
work_keys_str_mv AT botreltobiasengelayer hypofractionatedexternalbeamradiationtherapyhebrtversusconventionalexternalbeamradiationcebrtinpatientswithlocalizedprostatecancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT clarkotavio hypofractionatedexternalbeamradiationtherapyhebrtversusconventionalexternalbeamradiationcebrtinpatientswithlocalizedprostatecancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT pompeoantoniocarloslima hypofractionatedexternalbeamradiationtherapyhebrtversusconventionalexternalbeamradiationcebrtinpatientswithlocalizedprostatecancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT bretasfranciscoflaviohorta hypofractionatedexternalbeamradiationtherapyhebrtversusconventionalexternalbeamradiationcebrtinpatientswithlocalizedprostatecancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT sadimarcusvinicius hypofractionatedexternalbeamradiationtherapyhebrtversusconventionalexternalbeamradiationcebrtinpatientswithlocalizedprostatecancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT ferreiraubirajara hypofractionatedexternalbeamradiationtherapyhebrtversusconventionalexternalbeamradiationcebrtinpatientswithlocalizedprostatecancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT dosreisrodolfoborges hypofractionatedexternalbeamradiationtherapyhebrtversusconventionalexternalbeamradiationcebrtinpatientswithlocalizedprostatecancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis