Cargando…
Evaluating Amazon's Mechanical Turk as a Tool for Experimental Behavioral Research
Amazon Mechanical Turk (AMT) is an online crowdsourcing service where anonymous online workers complete web-based tasks for small sums of money. The service has attracted attention from experimental psychologists interested in gathering human subject data more efficiently. However, relative to tradi...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3596391/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23516406 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0057410 |
_version_ | 1782262508045729792 |
---|---|
author | Crump, Matthew J. C. McDonnell, John V. Gureckis, Todd M. |
author_facet | Crump, Matthew J. C. McDonnell, John V. Gureckis, Todd M. |
author_sort | Crump, Matthew J. C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Amazon Mechanical Turk (AMT) is an online crowdsourcing service where anonymous online workers complete web-based tasks for small sums of money. The service has attracted attention from experimental psychologists interested in gathering human subject data more efficiently. However, relative to traditional laboratory studies, many aspects of the testing environment are not under the experimenter's control. In this paper, we attempt to empirically evaluate the fidelity of the AMT system for use in cognitive behavioral experiments. These types of experiment differ from simple surveys in that they require multiple trials, sustained attention from participants, comprehension of complex instructions, and millisecond accuracy for response recording and stimulus presentation. We replicate a diverse body of tasks from experimental psychology including the Stroop, Switching, Flanker, Simon, Posner Cuing, attentional blink, subliminal priming, and category learning tasks using participants recruited using AMT. While most of replications were qualitatively successful and validated the approach of collecting data anonymously online using a web-browser, others revealed disparity between laboratory results and online results. A number of important lessons were encountered in the process of conducting these replications that should be of value to other researchers. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3596391 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35963912013-03-20 Evaluating Amazon's Mechanical Turk as a Tool for Experimental Behavioral Research Crump, Matthew J. C. McDonnell, John V. Gureckis, Todd M. PLoS One Research Article Amazon Mechanical Turk (AMT) is an online crowdsourcing service where anonymous online workers complete web-based tasks for small sums of money. The service has attracted attention from experimental psychologists interested in gathering human subject data more efficiently. However, relative to traditional laboratory studies, many aspects of the testing environment are not under the experimenter's control. In this paper, we attempt to empirically evaluate the fidelity of the AMT system for use in cognitive behavioral experiments. These types of experiment differ from simple surveys in that they require multiple trials, sustained attention from participants, comprehension of complex instructions, and millisecond accuracy for response recording and stimulus presentation. We replicate a diverse body of tasks from experimental psychology including the Stroop, Switching, Flanker, Simon, Posner Cuing, attentional blink, subliminal priming, and category learning tasks using participants recruited using AMT. While most of replications were qualitatively successful and validated the approach of collecting data anonymously online using a web-browser, others revealed disparity between laboratory results and online results. A number of important lessons were encountered in the process of conducting these replications that should be of value to other researchers. Public Library of Science 2013-03-13 /pmc/articles/PMC3596391/ /pubmed/23516406 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0057410 Text en © 2013 Crump et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Crump, Matthew J. C. McDonnell, John V. Gureckis, Todd M. Evaluating Amazon's Mechanical Turk as a Tool for Experimental Behavioral Research |
title | Evaluating Amazon's Mechanical Turk as a Tool for Experimental Behavioral Research |
title_full | Evaluating Amazon's Mechanical Turk as a Tool for Experimental Behavioral Research |
title_fullStr | Evaluating Amazon's Mechanical Turk as a Tool for Experimental Behavioral Research |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluating Amazon's Mechanical Turk as a Tool for Experimental Behavioral Research |
title_short | Evaluating Amazon's Mechanical Turk as a Tool for Experimental Behavioral Research |
title_sort | evaluating amazon's mechanical turk as a tool for experimental behavioral research |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3596391/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23516406 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0057410 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT crumpmatthewjc evaluatingamazonsmechanicalturkasatoolforexperimentalbehavioralresearch AT mcdonnelljohnv evaluatingamazonsmechanicalturkasatoolforexperimentalbehavioralresearch AT gureckistoddm evaluatingamazonsmechanicalturkasatoolforexperimentalbehavioralresearch |