Cargando…

Comparison of liquid-liquid extraction-thin layer chromatography with solid-phase extraction-high-performance thin layer chromatography in detection of urinary morphine

Liquid-liquid extraction-thin layer chromatography (LLE-TLC) has been a common and routine combined method for detection of drugs in biological materials. Solid-phase extraction (SPE) is gradually replacing the traditional LLE method. High performance thin layer chromatography (HPTLC) has several ad...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ahadi, Ali, Partoazar, Alireza, Abedi-Khorasgani, Mohammad-Hassan, Shetab-Boushehri, Seyed Vahid
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Editorial Department of Journal of Biomedical Research 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3596733/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23554712
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1674-8301(11)60048-1
_version_ 1782262551918149632
author Ahadi, Ali
Partoazar, Alireza
Abedi-Khorasgani, Mohammad-Hassan
Shetab-Boushehri, Seyed Vahid
author_facet Ahadi, Ali
Partoazar, Alireza
Abedi-Khorasgani, Mohammad-Hassan
Shetab-Boushehri, Seyed Vahid
author_sort Ahadi, Ali
collection PubMed
description Liquid-liquid extraction-thin layer chromatography (LLE-TLC) has been a common and routine combined method for detection of drugs in biological materials. Solid-phase extraction (SPE) is gradually replacing the traditional LLE method. High performance thin layer chromatography (HPTLC) has several advantages over TLC. The present work studied the higher efficiency of a new SPE-HPTLC method over that of a routine LLE-TLC method, in extraction and detection of urinary morphine. Fifty-eight urine samples, primarily identified as morphine-positive samples by a strip test, were re-screened by LLE-TLC and SPE-HPTLC. The results of LLE-TLC and SPE-HPTLC were then compared with each other. The results showed that the SPE-HPTLC detected 74% of total samples as morphine-positive samples whereas the LLE-TLC detected 48% of the same samples. We further discussed the effect of codeine abuse on TLC analysis of urinary morphine. Regarding the importance of morphine detection in urine, the present combined SPE-HPTLC method is suggested as a replacement method for detection of urinary morphine by many reference laboratories.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3596733
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Editorial Department of Journal of Biomedical Research
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35967332013-04-02 Comparison of liquid-liquid extraction-thin layer chromatography with solid-phase extraction-high-performance thin layer chromatography in detection of urinary morphine Ahadi, Ali Partoazar, Alireza Abedi-Khorasgani, Mohammad-Hassan Shetab-Boushehri, Seyed Vahid J Biomed Res Research Paper Liquid-liquid extraction-thin layer chromatography (LLE-TLC) has been a common and routine combined method for detection of drugs in biological materials. Solid-phase extraction (SPE) is gradually replacing the traditional LLE method. High performance thin layer chromatography (HPTLC) has several advantages over TLC. The present work studied the higher efficiency of a new SPE-HPTLC method over that of a routine LLE-TLC method, in extraction and detection of urinary morphine. Fifty-eight urine samples, primarily identified as morphine-positive samples by a strip test, were re-screened by LLE-TLC and SPE-HPTLC. The results of LLE-TLC and SPE-HPTLC were then compared with each other. The results showed that the SPE-HPTLC detected 74% of total samples as morphine-positive samples whereas the LLE-TLC detected 48% of the same samples. We further discussed the effect of codeine abuse on TLC analysis of urinary morphine. Regarding the importance of morphine detection in urine, the present combined SPE-HPTLC method is suggested as a replacement method for detection of urinary morphine by many reference laboratories. Editorial Department of Journal of Biomedical Research 2011-09 /pmc/articles/PMC3596733/ /pubmed/23554712 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1674-8301(11)60048-1 Text en © 2011 by the Journal of Biomedical Research. All rights reserved. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
spellingShingle Research Paper
Ahadi, Ali
Partoazar, Alireza
Abedi-Khorasgani, Mohammad-Hassan
Shetab-Boushehri, Seyed Vahid
Comparison of liquid-liquid extraction-thin layer chromatography with solid-phase extraction-high-performance thin layer chromatography in detection of urinary morphine
title Comparison of liquid-liquid extraction-thin layer chromatography with solid-phase extraction-high-performance thin layer chromatography in detection of urinary morphine
title_full Comparison of liquid-liquid extraction-thin layer chromatography with solid-phase extraction-high-performance thin layer chromatography in detection of urinary morphine
title_fullStr Comparison of liquid-liquid extraction-thin layer chromatography with solid-phase extraction-high-performance thin layer chromatography in detection of urinary morphine
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of liquid-liquid extraction-thin layer chromatography with solid-phase extraction-high-performance thin layer chromatography in detection of urinary morphine
title_short Comparison of liquid-liquid extraction-thin layer chromatography with solid-phase extraction-high-performance thin layer chromatography in detection of urinary morphine
title_sort comparison of liquid-liquid extraction-thin layer chromatography with solid-phase extraction-high-performance thin layer chromatography in detection of urinary morphine
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3596733/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23554712
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1674-8301(11)60048-1
work_keys_str_mv AT ahadiali comparisonofliquidliquidextractionthinlayerchromatographywithsolidphaseextractionhighperformancethinlayerchromatographyindetectionofurinarymorphine
AT partoazaralireza comparisonofliquidliquidextractionthinlayerchromatographywithsolidphaseextractionhighperformancethinlayerchromatographyindetectionofurinarymorphine
AT abedikhorasganimohammadhassan comparisonofliquidliquidextractionthinlayerchromatographywithsolidphaseextractionhighperformancethinlayerchromatographyindetectionofurinarymorphine
AT shetabboushehriseyedvahid comparisonofliquidliquidextractionthinlayerchromatographywithsolidphaseextractionhighperformancethinlayerchromatographyindetectionofurinarymorphine