Cargando…
Field Trapping the Little Fire Ant, Wasmannia auropunctata
Two detection methods for the little fire ant, Wasmannia auropunctata (Roger) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), both employing the pheromone attractant 2,5-dimethyl-3-(2-methylbutyl)pyrazine (2-MeBu-diMePy), were compared with peanut butter based detection, in order to evaluate differences in species speci...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
University of Wisconsin Library
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3596933/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23421782 http://dx.doi.org/10.1673/031.012.9301 |
_version_ | 1782262576719069184 |
---|---|
author | Derstine, Nathan T. Troyer, Elisa J. Suttles, Caitlyn N. Siderhurst, Leigh A. Jang, Eric B. Siderhurst, Matthew S. |
author_facet | Derstine, Nathan T. Troyer, Elisa J. Suttles, Caitlyn N. Siderhurst, Leigh A. Jang, Eric B. Siderhurst, Matthew S. |
author_sort | Derstine, Nathan T. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Two detection methods for the little fire ant, Wasmannia auropunctata (Roger) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), both employing the pheromone attractant 2,5-dimethyl-3-(2-methylbutyl)pyrazine (2-MeBu-diMePy), were compared with peanut butter based detection, in order to evaluate differences in species specificity and detection reliability. Trapping was conducted using a transect through a macadamia orchard on the island of Hawaii. The transect consisted of a series of three-tree plots, each plot contained a peanut butter coated stick (the most common detection method used for W. auropunctata in Hawaii), a one—way trap treated with 2-MeBu-diMePy, and a piece of double-sided tape treated with 2-MeBu-diMePy. While there were no differences in the number of W. auropunctata counted with each detection method, and no differences in detection reliability (detecting the known presence of W. auropunctata in a plot), the pheromone—incorporating methods showed greater species specificity, retaining W. auropunctata almost exclusively. These results demonstrate the potential of pheromone—detection methods to selectively capture target ant species even when other ants are present and abundant. Combined data from all three detection methods and a previous visual survey along the transect showed a marked difference in the frequency of cohabitation among ant species. Of the 10 ant species collected, W. auropunctata was found as the sole ant species on a given tree at a significantly higher frequency than all other ant species except Pheidole fervens. 94% percent of the trees with W. auropunctata had only W. auropunctata, supporting previous observations that this species tends to displace other ant species. In addition, W. auropunctata microhabitat preferences were investigated using one—way traps containing 2-MeBu-diMePy, which were placed in three arboreal and three non—arboreal locations. While the number of ants captured did not differ by trap placement, when grouped, captures were significantly higher in arboreal than non-arboreal microhabitats. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3596933 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | University of Wisconsin Library |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35969332013-03-15 Field Trapping the Little Fire Ant, Wasmannia auropunctata Derstine, Nathan T. Troyer, Elisa J. Suttles, Caitlyn N. Siderhurst, Leigh A. Jang, Eric B. Siderhurst, Matthew S. J Insect Sci Article Two detection methods for the little fire ant, Wasmannia auropunctata (Roger) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), both employing the pheromone attractant 2,5-dimethyl-3-(2-methylbutyl)pyrazine (2-MeBu-diMePy), were compared with peanut butter based detection, in order to evaluate differences in species specificity and detection reliability. Trapping was conducted using a transect through a macadamia orchard on the island of Hawaii. The transect consisted of a series of three-tree plots, each plot contained a peanut butter coated stick (the most common detection method used for W. auropunctata in Hawaii), a one—way trap treated with 2-MeBu-diMePy, and a piece of double-sided tape treated with 2-MeBu-diMePy. While there were no differences in the number of W. auropunctata counted with each detection method, and no differences in detection reliability (detecting the known presence of W. auropunctata in a plot), the pheromone—incorporating methods showed greater species specificity, retaining W. auropunctata almost exclusively. These results demonstrate the potential of pheromone—detection methods to selectively capture target ant species even when other ants are present and abundant. Combined data from all three detection methods and a previous visual survey along the transect showed a marked difference in the frequency of cohabitation among ant species. Of the 10 ant species collected, W. auropunctata was found as the sole ant species on a given tree at a significantly higher frequency than all other ant species except Pheidole fervens. 94% percent of the trees with W. auropunctata had only W. auropunctata, supporting previous observations that this species tends to displace other ant species. In addition, W. auropunctata microhabitat preferences were investigated using one—way traps containing 2-MeBu-diMePy, which were placed in three arboreal and three non—arboreal locations. While the number of ants captured did not differ by trap placement, when grouped, captures were significantly higher in arboreal than non-arboreal microhabitats. University of Wisconsin Library 2012-08-11 /pmc/articles/PMC3596933/ /pubmed/23421782 http://dx.doi.org/10.1673/031.012.9301 Text en © 2012 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Article Derstine, Nathan T. Troyer, Elisa J. Suttles, Caitlyn N. Siderhurst, Leigh A. Jang, Eric B. Siderhurst, Matthew S. Field Trapping the Little Fire Ant, Wasmannia auropunctata |
title | Field Trapping the Little Fire Ant, Wasmannia auropunctata
|
title_full | Field Trapping the Little Fire Ant, Wasmannia auropunctata
|
title_fullStr | Field Trapping the Little Fire Ant, Wasmannia auropunctata
|
title_full_unstemmed | Field Trapping the Little Fire Ant, Wasmannia auropunctata
|
title_short | Field Trapping the Little Fire Ant, Wasmannia auropunctata
|
title_sort | field trapping the little fire ant, wasmannia auropunctata |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3596933/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23421782 http://dx.doi.org/10.1673/031.012.9301 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT derstinenathant fieldtrappingthelittlefireantwasmanniaauropunctata AT troyerelisaj fieldtrappingthelittlefireantwasmanniaauropunctata AT suttlescaitlynn fieldtrappingthelittlefireantwasmanniaauropunctata AT siderhurstleigha fieldtrappingthelittlefireantwasmanniaauropunctata AT jangericb fieldtrappingthelittlefireantwasmanniaauropunctata AT siderhurstmatthews fieldtrappingthelittlefireantwasmanniaauropunctata |