Cargando…
The relationship of femoral neck shaft angle and adiposity to greater trochanteric pain syndrome in women. A case control morphology and anthropometric study
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate if pelvic or hip width predisposed women to developing greater trochanteric pain syndrome (GTPS). DESIGN: Prospective case control study. PARTICIPANTS: Four groups were included in the study: those gluteal tendon reconstructions (n=31, GTR), those with conservatively managed G...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Group
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3597182/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22547561 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2011-090744 |
_version_ | 1782262605197344768 |
---|---|
author | Fearon, AM Stephens, S Cook, JL Smith, PN Neeman, T Cormick, W Scarvell, JM |
author_facet | Fearon, AM Stephens, S Cook, JL Smith, PN Neeman, T Cormick, W Scarvell, JM |
author_sort | Fearon, AM |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To evaluate if pelvic or hip width predisposed women to developing greater trochanteric pain syndrome (GTPS). DESIGN: Prospective case control study. PARTICIPANTS: Four groups were included in the study: those gluteal tendon reconstructions (n=31, GTR), those with conservatively managed GTPS (n=29), those with hip osteoarthritis (n=20, OA) and 22 asymptomatic participants (ASC). METHODS: Anterior-posterior pelvic x-rays were evaluated for femoral neck shaft angle; acetabular index, and width at the lateral acetabulum, and the superior and lateral aspects of the greater trochanter. Body mass index, and waist, hip and greater trochanter girth were measured. Data were analysed using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA; posthoc Scheffe analysis), then multivariate analysis. RESULTS: The GTR group had a lower femoral neck shaft angle than the other groups (p=0.007). The OR (95% CI) of having a neck shaft angle of less than 134°, relative to the ASC group: GTR=3.33 (1.26 to 8.85); GTPS=1.4 (0.52 to 3.75); OA=0.85 (0.28 to 2.61). The OR of GTR relative to GTPS was 2.4 (1.01 to 5.6). No group difference was found for acetabular or greater trochanter width. Greater trochanter girth produced the only anthropometric group difference (mean (95% CI) in cm) GTR=103.8 (100.3 to 107.3), GTPS=105.9 (100.2 to 111.6), OA=100.3 (97.7 to 103.9), ASC=99.1 (94.7 to 103.5), (ANOVA: p=0.036). Multivariate analysis confirmed adiposity is associated with GTPS. CONCLUSION: A lower neck shaft angle is a risk factor for, and adiposity is associated with, GTPS in women. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3597182 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | BMJ Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35971822013-03-15 The relationship of femoral neck shaft angle and adiposity to greater trochanteric pain syndrome in women. A case control morphology and anthropometric study Fearon, AM Stephens, S Cook, JL Smith, PN Neeman, T Cormick, W Scarvell, JM Br J Sports Med Original Articles OBJECTIVE: To evaluate if pelvic or hip width predisposed women to developing greater trochanteric pain syndrome (GTPS). DESIGN: Prospective case control study. PARTICIPANTS: Four groups were included in the study: those gluteal tendon reconstructions (n=31, GTR), those with conservatively managed GTPS (n=29), those with hip osteoarthritis (n=20, OA) and 22 asymptomatic participants (ASC). METHODS: Anterior-posterior pelvic x-rays were evaluated for femoral neck shaft angle; acetabular index, and width at the lateral acetabulum, and the superior and lateral aspects of the greater trochanter. Body mass index, and waist, hip and greater trochanter girth were measured. Data were analysed using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA; posthoc Scheffe analysis), then multivariate analysis. RESULTS: The GTR group had a lower femoral neck shaft angle than the other groups (p=0.007). The OR (95% CI) of having a neck shaft angle of less than 134°, relative to the ASC group: GTR=3.33 (1.26 to 8.85); GTPS=1.4 (0.52 to 3.75); OA=0.85 (0.28 to 2.61). The OR of GTR relative to GTPS was 2.4 (1.01 to 5.6). No group difference was found for acetabular or greater trochanter width. Greater trochanter girth produced the only anthropometric group difference (mean (95% CI) in cm) GTR=103.8 (100.3 to 107.3), GTPS=105.9 (100.2 to 111.6), OA=100.3 (97.7 to 103.9), ASC=99.1 (94.7 to 103.5), (ANOVA: p=0.036). Multivariate analysis confirmed adiposity is associated with GTPS. CONCLUSION: A lower neck shaft angle is a risk factor for, and adiposity is associated with, GTPS in women. BMJ Group 2012-09 /pmc/articles/PMC3597182/ /pubmed/22547561 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2011-090744 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/legalcode |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Fearon, AM Stephens, S Cook, JL Smith, PN Neeman, T Cormick, W Scarvell, JM The relationship of femoral neck shaft angle and adiposity to greater trochanteric pain syndrome in women. A case control morphology and anthropometric study |
title | The relationship of femoral neck shaft angle and adiposity to greater trochanteric pain syndrome in women. A case control morphology and anthropometric study |
title_full | The relationship of femoral neck shaft angle and adiposity to greater trochanteric pain syndrome in women. A case control morphology and anthropometric study |
title_fullStr | The relationship of femoral neck shaft angle and adiposity to greater trochanteric pain syndrome in women. A case control morphology and anthropometric study |
title_full_unstemmed | The relationship of femoral neck shaft angle and adiposity to greater trochanteric pain syndrome in women. A case control morphology and anthropometric study |
title_short | The relationship of femoral neck shaft angle and adiposity to greater trochanteric pain syndrome in women. A case control morphology and anthropometric study |
title_sort | relationship of femoral neck shaft angle and adiposity to greater trochanteric pain syndrome in women. a case control morphology and anthropometric study |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3597182/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22547561 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2011-090744 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fearonam therelationshipoffemoralneckshaftangleandadipositytogreatertrochantericpainsyndromeinwomenacasecontrolmorphologyandanthropometricstudy AT stephenss therelationshipoffemoralneckshaftangleandadipositytogreatertrochantericpainsyndromeinwomenacasecontrolmorphologyandanthropometricstudy AT cookjl therelationshipoffemoralneckshaftangleandadipositytogreatertrochantericpainsyndromeinwomenacasecontrolmorphologyandanthropometricstudy AT smithpn therelationshipoffemoralneckshaftangleandadipositytogreatertrochantericpainsyndromeinwomenacasecontrolmorphologyandanthropometricstudy AT neemant therelationshipoffemoralneckshaftangleandadipositytogreatertrochantericpainsyndromeinwomenacasecontrolmorphologyandanthropometricstudy AT cormickw therelationshipoffemoralneckshaftangleandadipositytogreatertrochantericpainsyndromeinwomenacasecontrolmorphologyandanthropometricstudy AT scarvelljm therelationshipoffemoralneckshaftangleandadipositytogreatertrochantericpainsyndromeinwomenacasecontrolmorphologyandanthropometricstudy AT fearonam relationshipoffemoralneckshaftangleandadipositytogreatertrochantericpainsyndromeinwomenacasecontrolmorphologyandanthropometricstudy AT stephenss relationshipoffemoralneckshaftangleandadipositytogreatertrochantericpainsyndromeinwomenacasecontrolmorphologyandanthropometricstudy AT cookjl relationshipoffemoralneckshaftangleandadipositytogreatertrochantericpainsyndromeinwomenacasecontrolmorphologyandanthropometricstudy AT smithpn relationshipoffemoralneckshaftangleandadipositytogreatertrochantericpainsyndromeinwomenacasecontrolmorphologyandanthropometricstudy AT neemant relationshipoffemoralneckshaftangleandadipositytogreatertrochantericpainsyndromeinwomenacasecontrolmorphologyandanthropometricstudy AT cormickw relationshipoffemoralneckshaftangleandadipositytogreatertrochantericpainsyndromeinwomenacasecontrolmorphologyandanthropometricstudy AT scarvelljm relationshipoffemoralneckshaftangleandadipositytogreatertrochantericpainsyndromeinwomenacasecontrolmorphologyandanthropometricstudy |