Cargando…

The relationship of femoral neck shaft angle and adiposity to greater trochanteric pain syndrome in women. A case control morphology and anthropometric study

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate if pelvic or hip width predisposed women to developing greater trochanteric pain syndrome (GTPS). DESIGN: Prospective case control study. PARTICIPANTS: Four groups were included in the study: those gluteal tendon reconstructions (n=31, GTR), those with conservatively managed G...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fearon, AM, Stephens, S, Cook, JL, Smith, PN, Neeman, T, Cormick, W, Scarvell, JM
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Group 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3597182/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22547561
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2011-090744
_version_ 1782262605197344768
author Fearon, AM
Stephens, S
Cook, JL
Smith, PN
Neeman, T
Cormick, W
Scarvell, JM
author_facet Fearon, AM
Stephens, S
Cook, JL
Smith, PN
Neeman, T
Cormick, W
Scarvell, JM
author_sort Fearon, AM
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate if pelvic or hip width predisposed women to developing greater trochanteric pain syndrome (GTPS). DESIGN: Prospective case control study. PARTICIPANTS: Four groups were included in the study: those gluteal tendon reconstructions (n=31, GTR), those with conservatively managed GTPS (n=29), those with hip osteoarthritis (n=20, OA) and 22 asymptomatic participants (ASC). METHODS: Anterior-posterior pelvic x-rays were evaluated for femoral neck shaft angle; acetabular index, and width at the lateral acetabulum, and the superior and lateral aspects of the greater trochanter. Body mass index, and waist, hip and greater trochanter girth were measured. Data were analysed using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA; posthoc Scheffe analysis), then multivariate analysis. RESULTS: The GTR group had a lower femoral neck shaft angle than the other groups (p=0.007). The OR (95% CI) of having a neck shaft angle of less than 134°, relative to the ASC group: GTR=3.33 (1.26 to 8.85); GTPS=1.4 (0.52 to 3.75); OA=0.85 (0.28 to 2.61). The OR of GTR relative to GTPS was 2.4 (1.01 to 5.6). No group difference was found for acetabular or greater trochanter width. Greater trochanter girth produced the only anthropometric group difference (mean (95% CI) in cm) GTR=103.8 (100.3 to 107.3), GTPS=105.9 (100.2 to 111.6), OA=100.3 (97.7 to 103.9), ASC=99.1 (94.7 to 103.5), (ANOVA: p=0.036). Multivariate analysis confirmed adiposity is associated with GTPS. CONCLUSION: A lower neck shaft angle is a risk factor for, and adiposity is associated with, GTPS in women.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3597182
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BMJ Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35971822013-03-15 The relationship of femoral neck shaft angle and adiposity to greater trochanteric pain syndrome in women. A case control morphology and anthropometric study Fearon, AM Stephens, S Cook, JL Smith, PN Neeman, T Cormick, W Scarvell, JM Br J Sports Med Original Articles OBJECTIVE: To evaluate if pelvic or hip width predisposed women to developing greater trochanteric pain syndrome (GTPS). DESIGN: Prospective case control study. PARTICIPANTS: Four groups were included in the study: those gluteal tendon reconstructions (n=31, GTR), those with conservatively managed GTPS (n=29), those with hip osteoarthritis (n=20, OA) and 22 asymptomatic participants (ASC). METHODS: Anterior-posterior pelvic x-rays were evaluated for femoral neck shaft angle; acetabular index, and width at the lateral acetabulum, and the superior and lateral aspects of the greater trochanter. Body mass index, and waist, hip and greater trochanter girth were measured. Data were analysed using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA; posthoc Scheffe analysis), then multivariate analysis. RESULTS: The GTR group had a lower femoral neck shaft angle than the other groups (p=0.007). The OR (95% CI) of having a neck shaft angle of less than 134°, relative to the ASC group: GTR=3.33 (1.26 to 8.85); GTPS=1.4 (0.52 to 3.75); OA=0.85 (0.28 to 2.61). The OR of GTR relative to GTPS was 2.4 (1.01 to 5.6). No group difference was found for acetabular or greater trochanter width. Greater trochanter girth produced the only anthropometric group difference (mean (95% CI) in cm) GTR=103.8 (100.3 to 107.3), GTPS=105.9 (100.2 to 111.6), OA=100.3 (97.7 to 103.9), ASC=99.1 (94.7 to 103.5), (ANOVA: p=0.036). Multivariate analysis confirmed adiposity is associated with GTPS. CONCLUSION: A lower neck shaft angle is a risk factor for, and adiposity is associated with, GTPS in women. BMJ Group 2012-09 /pmc/articles/PMC3597182/ /pubmed/22547561 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2011-090744 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/legalcode
spellingShingle Original Articles
Fearon, AM
Stephens, S
Cook, JL
Smith, PN
Neeman, T
Cormick, W
Scarvell, JM
The relationship of femoral neck shaft angle and adiposity to greater trochanteric pain syndrome in women. A case control morphology and anthropometric study
title The relationship of femoral neck shaft angle and adiposity to greater trochanteric pain syndrome in women. A case control morphology and anthropometric study
title_full The relationship of femoral neck shaft angle and adiposity to greater trochanteric pain syndrome in women. A case control morphology and anthropometric study
title_fullStr The relationship of femoral neck shaft angle and adiposity to greater trochanteric pain syndrome in women. A case control morphology and anthropometric study
title_full_unstemmed The relationship of femoral neck shaft angle and adiposity to greater trochanteric pain syndrome in women. A case control morphology and anthropometric study
title_short The relationship of femoral neck shaft angle and adiposity to greater trochanteric pain syndrome in women. A case control morphology and anthropometric study
title_sort relationship of femoral neck shaft angle and adiposity to greater trochanteric pain syndrome in women. a case control morphology and anthropometric study
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3597182/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22547561
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2011-090744
work_keys_str_mv AT fearonam therelationshipoffemoralneckshaftangleandadipositytogreatertrochantericpainsyndromeinwomenacasecontrolmorphologyandanthropometricstudy
AT stephenss therelationshipoffemoralneckshaftangleandadipositytogreatertrochantericpainsyndromeinwomenacasecontrolmorphologyandanthropometricstudy
AT cookjl therelationshipoffemoralneckshaftangleandadipositytogreatertrochantericpainsyndromeinwomenacasecontrolmorphologyandanthropometricstudy
AT smithpn therelationshipoffemoralneckshaftangleandadipositytogreatertrochantericpainsyndromeinwomenacasecontrolmorphologyandanthropometricstudy
AT neemant therelationshipoffemoralneckshaftangleandadipositytogreatertrochantericpainsyndromeinwomenacasecontrolmorphologyandanthropometricstudy
AT cormickw therelationshipoffemoralneckshaftangleandadipositytogreatertrochantericpainsyndromeinwomenacasecontrolmorphologyandanthropometricstudy
AT scarvelljm therelationshipoffemoralneckshaftangleandadipositytogreatertrochantericpainsyndromeinwomenacasecontrolmorphologyandanthropometricstudy
AT fearonam relationshipoffemoralneckshaftangleandadipositytogreatertrochantericpainsyndromeinwomenacasecontrolmorphologyandanthropometricstudy
AT stephenss relationshipoffemoralneckshaftangleandadipositytogreatertrochantericpainsyndromeinwomenacasecontrolmorphologyandanthropometricstudy
AT cookjl relationshipoffemoralneckshaftangleandadipositytogreatertrochantericpainsyndromeinwomenacasecontrolmorphologyandanthropometricstudy
AT smithpn relationshipoffemoralneckshaftangleandadipositytogreatertrochantericpainsyndromeinwomenacasecontrolmorphologyandanthropometricstudy
AT neemant relationshipoffemoralneckshaftangleandadipositytogreatertrochantericpainsyndromeinwomenacasecontrolmorphologyandanthropometricstudy
AT cormickw relationshipoffemoralneckshaftangleandadipositytogreatertrochantericpainsyndromeinwomenacasecontrolmorphologyandanthropometricstudy
AT scarvelljm relationshipoffemoralneckshaftangleandadipositytogreatertrochantericpainsyndromeinwomenacasecontrolmorphologyandanthropometricstudy