Cargando…

Comparison of two fracture toughness testing methods using a glass-infiltrated and a zirconia dental ceramic

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to compare the fracture toughness (K(Ic)) obtained from the single edge V-notched beam (SEVNB) and the fractographic analysis (FTA) of a glass-infiltrated and a zirconia ceramic. MATERIALS AND METHODS: For each material, ten bar-shaped specimens were prepared...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Triwatana, Premwara, Srinuan, Phakphum, Suputtamongkol, Kallaya
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3597924/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23507882
http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2013.5.1.36
_version_ 1782262703674359808
author Triwatana, Premwara
Srinuan, Phakphum
Suputtamongkol, Kallaya
author_facet Triwatana, Premwara
Srinuan, Phakphum
Suputtamongkol, Kallaya
author_sort Triwatana, Premwara
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to compare the fracture toughness (K(Ic)) obtained from the single edge V-notched beam (SEVNB) and the fractographic analysis (FTA) of a glass-infiltrated and a zirconia ceramic. MATERIALS AND METHODS: For each material, ten bar-shaped specimens were prepared for the SEVNB method (3 mm × 4 mm × 25 mm) and the FTA method (2 mm × 4 mm × 25 mm). The starter V-notch was prepared as the fracture initiating flaw for the SEVNB method. A Vickers indentation load of 49 N was used to create a controlled surface flaw on each FTA specimen. All specimens were loaded to fracture using a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 0.5-1 mm/min. The independent-samples t-test was used for the statistical analysis of the K(Ic) values at α=0.05. RESULTS: The mean K(Ic) of zirconia ceramic obtained from SEVNB method (5.4 ± 1.6 MPa·m(1/2)) was comparable to that obtained from FTA method (6.3 ± 1.6 MPa·m(1/2)). The mean K(Ic) of glass-infiltrated ceramic obtained from SEVNB method (4.1 ± 0.6 MPa·m(1/2)) was significantly lower than that obtained from FTA method (5.1 ± 0.7 MPa·m(1/2)). CONCLUSION: The mean K(Ic) of the glass-infiltrated and zirconia ceramics obtained from the SEVNB method were lower than those obtained from FTA method even they were not significantly different for the zirconia material. The differences in the K(Ic) values could be a result of the differences in the characteristics of fracture initiating flaws of these two methods.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3597924
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35979242013-03-18 Comparison of two fracture toughness testing methods using a glass-infiltrated and a zirconia dental ceramic Triwatana, Premwara Srinuan, Phakphum Suputtamongkol, Kallaya J Adv Prosthodont Original Article PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to compare the fracture toughness (K(Ic)) obtained from the single edge V-notched beam (SEVNB) and the fractographic analysis (FTA) of a glass-infiltrated and a zirconia ceramic. MATERIALS AND METHODS: For each material, ten bar-shaped specimens were prepared for the SEVNB method (3 mm × 4 mm × 25 mm) and the FTA method (2 mm × 4 mm × 25 mm). The starter V-notch was prepared as the fracture initiating flaw for the SEVNB method. A Vickers indentation load of 49 N was used to create a controlled surface flaw on each FTA specimen. All specimens were loaded to fracture using a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 0.5-1 mm/min. The independent-samples t-test was used for the statistical analysis of the K(Ic) values at α=0.05. RESULTS: The mean K(Ic) of zirconia ceramic obtained from SEVNB method (5.4 ± 1.6 MPa·m(1/2)) was comparable to that obtained from FTA method (6.3 ± 1.6 MPa·m(1/2)). The mean K(Ic) of glass-infiltrated ceramic obtained from SEVNB method (4.1 ± 0.6 MPa·m(1/2)) was significantly lower than that obtained from FTA method (5.1 ± 0.7 MPa·m(1/2)). CONCLUSION: The mean K(Ic) of the glass-infiltrated and zirconia ceramics obtained from the SEVNB method were lower than those obtained from FTA method even they were not significantly different for the zirconia material. The differences in the K(Ic) values could be a result of the differences in the characteristics of fracture initiating flaws of these two methods. The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics 2013-02 2013-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC3597924/ /pubmed/23507882 http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2013.5.1.36 Text en © 2013 The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Triwatana, Premwara
Srinuan, Phakphum
Suputtamongkol, Kallaya
Comparison of two fracture toughness testing methods using a glass-infiltrated and a zirconia dental ceramic
title Comparison of two fracture toughness testing methods using a glass-infiltrated and a zirconia dental ceramic
title_full Comparison of two fracture toughness testing methods using a glass-infiltrated and a zirconia dental ceramic
title_fullStr Comparison of two fracture toughness testing methods using a glass-infiltrated and a zirconia dental ceramic
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of two fracture toughness testing methods using a glass-infiltrated and a zirconia dental ceramic
title_short Comparison of two fracture toughness testing methods using a glass-infiltrated and a zirconia dental ceramic
title_sort comparison of two fracture toughness testing methods using a glass-infiltrated and a zirconia dental ceramic
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3597924/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23507882
http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2013.5.1.36
work_keys_str_mv AT triwatanapremwara comparisonoftwofracturetoughnesstestingmethodsusingaglassinfiltratedandazirconiadentalceramic
AT srinuanphakphum comparisonoftwofracturetoughnesstestingmethodsusingaglassinfiltratedandazirconiadentalceramic
AT suputtamongkolkallaya comparisonoftwofracturetoughnesstestingmethodsusingaglassinfiltratedandazirconiadentalceramic