Cargando…
Comparison of two fracture toughness testing methods using a glass-infiltrated and a zirconia dental ceramic
PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to compare the fracture toughness (K(Ic)) obtained from the single edge V-notched beam (SEVNB) and the fractographic analysis (FTA) of a glass-infiltrated and a zirconia ceramic. MATERIALS AND METHODS: For each material, ten bar-shaped specimens were prepared...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3597924/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23507882 http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2013.5.1.36 |
_version_ | 1782262703674359808 |
---|---|
author | Triwatana, Premwara Srinuan, Phakphum Suputtamongkol, Kallaya |
author_facet | Triwatana, Premwara Srinuan, Phakphum Suputtamongkol, Kallaya |
author_sort | Triwatana, Premwara |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to compare the fracture toughness (K(Ic)) obtained from the single edge V-notched beam (SEVNB) and the fractographic analysis (FTA) of a glass-infiltrated and a zirconia ceramic. MATERIALS AND METHODS: For each material, ten bar-shaped specimens were prepared for the SEVNB method (3 mm × 4 mm × 25 mm) and the FTA method (2 mm × 4 mm × 25 mm). The starter V-notch was prepared as the fracture initiating flaw for the SEVNB method. A Vickers indentation load of 49 N was used to create a controlled surface flaw on each FTA specimen. All specimens were loaded to fracture using a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 0.5-1 mm/min. The independent-samples t-test was used for the statistical analysis of the K(Ic) values at α=0.05. RESULTS: The mean K(Ic) of zirconia ceramic obtained from SEVNB method (5.4 ± 1.6 MPa·m(1/2)) was comparable to that obtained from FTA method (6.3 ± 1.6 MPa·m(1/2)). The mean K(Ic) of glass-infiltrated ceramic obtained from SEVNB method (4.1 ± 0.6 MPa·m(1/2)) was significantly lower than that obtained from FTA method (5.1 ± 0.7 MPa·m(1/2)). CONCLUSION: The mean K(Ic) of the glass-infiltrated and zirconia ceramics obtained from the SEVNB method were lower than those obtained from FTA method even they were not significantly different for the zirconia material. The differences in the K(Ic) values could be a result of the differences in the characteristics of fracture initiating flaws of these two methods. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3597924 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35979242013-03-18 Comparison of two fracture toughness testing methods using a glass-infiltrated and a zirconia dental ceramic Triwatana, Premwara Srinuan, Phakphum Suputtamongkol, Kallaya J Adv Prosthodont Original Article PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to compare the fracture toughness (K(Ic)) obtained from the single edge V-notched beam (SEVNB) and the fractographic analysis (FTA) of a glass-infiltrated and a zirconia ceramic. MATERIALS AND METHODS: For each material, ten bar-shaped specimens were prepared for the SEVNB method (3 mm × 4 mm × 25 mm) and the FTA method (2 mm × 4 mm × 25 mm). The starter V-notch was prepared as the fracture initiating flaw for the SEVNB method. A Vickers indentation load of 49 N was used to create a controlled surface flaw on each FTA specimen. All specimens were loaded to fracture using a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 0.5-1 mm/min. The independent-samples t-test was used for the statistical analysis of the K(Ic) values at α=0.05. RESULTS: The mean K(Ic) of zirconia ceramic obtained from SEVNB method (5.4 ± 1.6 MPa·m(1/2)) was comparable to that obtained from FTA method (6.3 ± 1.6 MPa·m(1/2)). The mean K(Ic) of glass-infiltrated ceramic obtained from SEVNB method (4.1 ± 0.6 MPa·m(1/2)) was significantly lower than that obtained from FTA method (5.1 ± 0.7 MPa·m(1/2)). CONCLUSION: The mean K(Ic) of the glass-infiltrated and zirconia ceramics obtained from the SEVNB method were lower than those obtained from FTA method even they were not significantly different for the zirconia material. The differences in the K(Ic) values could be a result of the differences in the characteristics of fracture initiating flaws of these two methods. The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics 2013-02 2013-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC3597924/ /pubmed/23507882 http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2013.5.1.36 Text en © 2013 The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Triwatana, Premwara Srinuan, Phakphum Suputtamongkol, Kallaya Comparison of two fracture toughness testing methods using a glass-infiltrated and a zirconia dental ceramic |
title | Comparison of two fracture toughness testing methods using a glass-infiltrated and a zirconia dental ceramic |
title_full | Comparison of two fracture toughness testing methods using a glass-infiltrated and a zirconia dental ceramic |
title_fullStr | Comparison of two fracture toughness testing methods using a glass-infiltrated and a zirconia dental ceramic |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of two fracture toughness testing methods using a glass-infiltrated and a zirconia dental ceramic |
title_short | Comparison of two fracture toughness testing methods using a glass-infiltrated and a zirconia dental ceramic |
title_sort | comparison of two fracture toughness testing methods using a glass-infiltrated and a zirconia dental ceramic |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3597924/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23507882 http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2013.5.1.36 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT triwatanapremwara comparisonoftwofracturetoughnesstestingmethodsusingaglassinfiltratedandazirconiadentalceramic AT srinuanphakphum comparisonoftwofracturetoughnesstestingmethodsusingaglassinfiltratedandazirconiadentalceramic AT suputtamongkolkallaya comparisonoftwofracturetoughnesstestingmethodsusingaglassinfiltratedandazirconiadentalceramic |