Cargando…
Could DNA uptake be a side effect of bacterial adhesion and twitching motility?
DNA acquisition promotes the spread of resistance to antibiotics and virulence among bacteria. It is also linked to several natural phenomena including recombination, genome dynamics, adaptation and speciation. Horizontal DNA transfer between bacteria occurs via conjugation, transduction or competen...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer-Verlag
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3597990/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23381940 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00203-013-0870-1 |
_version_ | 1782262708710670336 |
---|---|
author | Bakkali, M. |
author_facet | Bakkali, M. |
author_sort | Bakkali, M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | DNA acquisition promotes the spread of resistance to antibiotics and virulence among bacteria. It is also linked to several natural phenomena including recombination, genome dynamics, adaptation and speciation. Horizontal DNA transfer between bacteria occurs via conjugation, transduction or competence for natural transformation by DNA uptake. Among these, competence is the only mechanism of transformation initiated and entirely controlled by the chromosome of the recipient bacteria. While the molecular mechanisms allowing the uptake of extracellular DNA are increasingly characterized, the function of competence for natural transformation by DNA uptake, the selective advantage maintaining it and the reasons why bacteria take up DNA in the first place are still debated. In this synthesis, I review some of the literature and discuss the four hypotheses on how and why do bacteria take up DNA. I argue that DNA uptake by bacteria is an accidental by-product of bacterial adhesion and twitching motility. Adhesion and motility are generally increased in stressful conditions, which may explain why bacteria increase DNA uptake in these conditions. In addition to its fundamental scientific relevance, the new hypothesis suggested here has significant clinical implications and finds further support from the fact that antibiotics sometimes fail to eliminate the targeted bacterium while inevitably causing stress to others. The widespread misuse of antibiotics may thus not only be selecting for resistant strains, but may also be causing bacteria to take up more DNA with the consequent increase in the chances of acquiring drug resistance and virulence—a scenario in full concordance with the previously reported induction of competence genes by antibiotics in Streptococcus pneumoniae and Legionella pneumophila. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3597990 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Springer-Verlag |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35979902013-03-19 Could DNA uptake be a side effect of bacterial adhesion and twitching motility? Bakkali, M. Arch Microbiol Visions & Reflections DNA acquisition promotes the spread of resistance to antibiotics and virulence among bacteria. It is also linked to several natural phenomena including recombination, genome dynamics, adaptation and speciation. Horizontal DNA transfer between bacteria occurs via conjugation, transduction or competence for natural transformation by DNA uptake. Among these, competence is the only mechanism of transformation initiated and entirely controlled by the chromosome of the recipient bacteria. While the molecular mechanisms allowing the uptake of extracellular DNA are increasingly characterized, the function of competence for natural transformation by DNA uptake, the selective advantage maintaining it and the reasons why bacteria take up DNA in the first place are still debated. In this synthesis, I review some of the literature and discuss the four hypotheses on how and why do bacteria take up DNA. I argue that DNA uptake by bacteria is an accidental by-product of bacterial adhesion and twitching motility. Adhesion and motility are generally increased in stressful conditions, which may explain why bacteria increase DNA uptake in these conditions. In addition to its fundamental scientific relevance, the new hypothesis suggested here has significant clinical implications and finds further support from the fact that antibiotics sometimes fail to eliminate the targeted bacterium while inevitably causing stress to others. The widespread misuse of antibiotics may thus not only be selecting for resistant strains, but may also be causing bacteria to take up more DNA with the consequent increase in the chances of acquiring drug resistance and virulence—a scenario in full concordance with the previously reported induction of competence genes by antibiotics in Streptococcus pneumoniae and Legionella pneumophila. Springer-Verlag 2013-02-05 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC3597990/ /pubmed/23381940 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00203-013-0870-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2013 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Visions & Reflections Bakkali, M. Could DNA uptake be a side effect of bacterial adhesion and twitching motility? |
title | Could DNA uptake be a side effect of bacterial adhesion and twitching motility? |
title_full | Could DNA uptake be a side effect of bacterial adhesion and twitching motility? |
title_fullStr | Could DNA uptake be a side effect of bacterial adhesion and twitching motility? |
title_full_unstemmed | Could DNA uptake be a side effect of bacterial adhesion and twitching motility? |
title_short | Could DNA uptake be a side effect of bacterial adhesion and twitching motility? |
title_sort | could dna uptake be a side effect of bacterial adhesion and twitching motility? |
topic | Visions & Reflections |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3597990/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23381940 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00203-013-0870-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bakkalim coulddnauptakebeasideeffectofbacterialadhesionandtwitchingmotility |