Cargando…
Molecular profiles of screen detected vs. symptomatic breast cancer and their impact on survival: results from a clinical series
BACKGROUND: Stage shift is widely considered a major determinant of the survival benefit conferred by breast cancer screening. However, factors and mechanisms underlying such a prognostic advantage need further clarification. We sought to compare the molecular characteristics of screen detected vs....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3598199/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23305429 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-13-15 |
_version_ | 1782262736029220864 |
---|---|
author | Crispo, Anna Barba, Maddalena D’Aiuto, Giuseppe De Laurentiis, Michelino Grimaldi, Maria Rinaldo, Massimo Caolo, Giuseppina D’Aiuto, Massimiliano Capasso, Immacolata Esposito, Emanuela Amore, Alfonso Di Bonito, Maurizio Botti, Gerardo Montella, Maurizio |
author_facet | Crispo, Anna Barba, Maddalena D’Aiuto, Giuseppe De Laurentiis, Michelino Grimaldi, Maria Rinaldo, Massimo Caolo, Giuseppina D’Aiuto, Massimiliano Capasso, Immacolata Esposito, Emanuela Amore, Alfonso Di Bonito, Maurizio Botti, Gerardo Montella, Maurizio |
author_sort | Crispo, Anna |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Stage shift is widely considered a major determinant of the survival benefit conferred by breast cancer screening. However, factors and mechanisms underlying such a prognostic advantage need further clarification. We sought to compare the molecular characteristics of screen detected vs. symptomatic breast cancers and assess whether differences in tumour biology might translate into survival benefit. METHODS: In a clinical series of 448 women with operable breast cancer, the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test were used to estimate the likelihood of cancer recurrence and death. The Cox proportional hazard model was used for the multivariate analyses including mode of detection, age at diagnosis, tumour size, and lymph node status. These same models were applied to subgroups defined by molecular subtypes. RESULTS: Screen detected breast cancers tended to show more favourable clinicopathological features and survival outcomes compared to symptomatic cancers. The luminal A subtype was more common in women with mammography detected tumours than in symptomatic patients (68.5 vs. 59.0%, p=0.04). Data analysis across categories of molecular subtypes revealed significantly longer disease free and overall survival for screen detected cancers with a luminal A subtype only (p=0.01 and 0.02, respectively). For women with a luminal A subtype, the independent prognostic role of mode of detection on recurrence was confirmed in Cox proportional hazard models (p=0.03). An independent role of modality of detection on survival was also suggested (p=0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Molecular subtypes did not substantially explain the differences in survival outcomes between screened and symptomatic patients. However, our results suggest that molecular profiles might play a role in interpreting such differences at least partially. Further studies are warranted to reinterpret the efficacy of screening programmes in the light of tumour biology. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3598199 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35981992013-03-16 Molecular profiles of screen detected vs. symptomatic breast cancer and their impact on survival: results from a clinical series Crispo, Anna Barba, Maddalena D’Aiuto, Giuseppe De Laurentiis, Michelino Grimaldi, Maria Rinaldo, Massimo Caolo, Giuseppina D’Aiuto, Massimiliano Capasso, Immacolata Esposito, Emanuela Amore, Alfonso Di Bonito, Maurizio Botti, Gerardo Montella, Maurizio BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: Stage shift is widely considered a major determinant of the survival benefit conferred by breast cancer screening. However, factors and mechanisms underlying such a prognostic advantage need further clarification. We sought to compare the molecular characteristics of screen detected vs. symptomatic breast cancers and assess whether differences in tumour biology might translate into survival benefit. METHODS: In a clinical series of 448 women with operable breast cancer, the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test were used to estimate the likelihood of cancer recurrence and death. The Cox proportional hazard model was used for the multivariate analyses including mode of detection, age at diagnosis, tumour size, and lymph node status. These same models were applied to subgroups defined by molecular subtypes. RESULTS: Screen detected breast cancers tended to show more favourable clinicopathological features and survival outcomes compared to symptomatic cancers. The luminal A subtype was more common in women with mammography detected tumours than in symptomatic patients (68.5 vs. 59.0%, p=0.04). Data analysis across categories of molecular subtypes revealed significantly longer disease free and overall survival for screen detected cancers with a luminal A subtype only (p=0.01 and 0.02, respectively). For women with a luminal A subtype, the independent prognostic role of mode of detection on recurrence was confirmed in Cox proportional hazard models (p=0.03). An independent role of modality of detection on survival was also suggested (p=0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Molecular subtypes did not substantially explain the differences in survival outcomes between screened and symptomatic patients. However, our results suggest that molecular profiles might play a role in interpreting such differences at least partially. Further studies are warranted to reinterpret the efficacy of screening programmes in the light of tumour biology. BioMed Central 2013-01-10 /pmc/articles/PMC3598199/ /pubmed/23305429 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-13-15 Text en Copyright ©2013 Crispo et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Crispo, Anna Barba, Maddalena D’Aiuto, Giuseppe De Laurentiis, Michelino Grimaldi, Maria Rinaldo, Massimo Caolo, Giuseppina D’Aiuto, Massimiliano Capasso, Immacolata Esposito, Emanuela Amore, Alfonso Di Bonito, Maurizio Botti, Gerardo Montella, Maurizio Molecular profiles of screen detected vs. symptomatic breast cancer and their impact on survival: results from a clinical series |
title | Molecular profiles of screen detected vs. symptomatic breast cancer and their impact on survival: results from a clinical series |
title_full | Molecular profiles of screen detected vs. symptomatic breast cancer and their impact on survival: results from a clinical series |
title_fullStr | Molecular profiles of screen detected vs. symptomatic breast cancer and their impact on survival: results from a clinical series |
title_full_unstemmed | Molecular profiles of screen detected vs. symptomatic breast cancer and their impact on survival: results from a clinical series |
title_short | Molecular profiles of screen detected vs. symptomatic breast cancer and their impact on survival: results from a clinical series |
title_sort | molecular profiles of screen detected vs. symptomatic breast cancer and their impact on survival: results from a clinical series |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3598199/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23305429 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-13-15 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT crispoanna molecularprofilesofscreendetectedvssymptomaticbreastcancerandtheirimpactonsurvivalresultsfromaclinicalseries AT barbamaddalena molecularprofilesofscreendetectedvssymptomaticbreastcancerandtheirimpactonsurvivalresultsfromaclinicalseries AT daiutogiuseppe molecularprofilesofscreendetectedvssymptomaticbreastcancerandtheirimpactonsurvivalresultsfromaclinicalseries AT delaurentiismichelino molecularprofilesofscreendetectedvssymptomaticbreastcancerandtheirimpactonsurvivalresultsfromaclinicalseries AT grimaldimaria molecularprofilesofscreendetectedvssymptomaticbreastcancerandtheirimpactonsurvivalresultsfromaclinicalseries AT rinaldomassimo molecularprofilesofscreendetectedvssymptomaticbreastcancerandtheirimpactonsurvivalresultsfromaclinicalseries AT caologiuseppina molecularprofilesofscreendetectedvssymptomaticbreastcancerandtheirimpactonsurvivalresultsfromaclinicalseries AT daiutomassimiliano molecularprofilesofscreendetectedvssymptomaticbreastcancerandtheirimpactonsurvivalresultsfromaclinicalseries AT capassoimmacolata molecularprofilesofscreendetectedvssymptomaticbreastcancerandtheirimpactonsurvivalresultsfromaclinicalseries AT espositoemanuela molecularprofilesofscreendetectedvssymptomaticbreastcancerandtheirimpactonsurvivalresultsfromaclinicalseries AT amorealfonso molecularprofilesofscreendetectedvssymptomaticbreastcancerandtheirimpactonsurvivalresultsfromaclinicalseries AT dibonitomaurizio molecularprofilesofscreendetectedvssymptomaticbreastcancerandtheirimpactonsurvivalresultsfromaclinicalseries AT bottigerardo molecularprofilesofscreendetectedvssymptomaticbreastcancerandtheirimpactonsurvivalresultsfromaclinicalseries AT montellamaurizio molecularprofilesofscreendetectedvssymptomaticbreastcancerandtheirimpactonsurvivalresultsfromaclinicalseries |