Cargando…

Molecular profiles of screen detected vs. symptomatic breast cancer and their impact on survival: results from a clinical series

BACKGROUND: Stage shift is widely considered a major determinant of the survival benefit conferred by breast cancer screening. However, factors and mechanisms underlying such a prognostic advantage need further clarification. We sought to compare the molecular characteristics of screen detected vs....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Crispo, Anna, Barba, Maddalena, D’Aiuto, Giuseppe, De Laurentiis, Michelino, Grimaldi, Maria, Rinaldo, Massimo, Caolo, Giuseppina, D’Aiuto, Massimiliano, Capasso, Immacolata, Esposito, Emanuela, Amore, Alfonso, Di Bonito, Maurizio, Botti, Gerardo, Montella, Maurizio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3598199/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23305429
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-13-15
_version_ 1782262736029220864
author Crispo, Anna
Barba, Maddalena
D’Aiuto, Giuseppe
De Laurentiis, Michelino
Grimaldi, Maria
Rinaldo, Massimo
Caolo, Giuseppina
D’Aiuto, Massimiliano
Capasso, Immacolata
Esposito, Emanuela
Amore, Alfonso
Di Bonito, Maurizio
Botti, Gerardo
Montella, Maurizio
author_facet Crispo, Anna
Barba, Maddalena
D’Aiuto, Giuseppe
De Laurentiis, Michelino
Grimaldi, Maria
Rinaldo, Massimo
Caolo, Giuseppina
D’Aiuto, Massimiliano
Capasso, Immacolata
Esposito, Emanuela
Amore, Alfonso
Di Bonito, Maurizio
Botti, Gerardo
Montella, Maurizio
author_sort Crispo, Anna
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Stage shift is widely considered a major determinant of the survival benefit conferred by breast cancer screening. However, factors and mechanisms underlying such a prognostic advantage need further clarification. We sought to compare the molecular characteristics of screen detected vs. symptomatic breast cancers and assess whether differences in tumour biology might translate into survival benefit. METHODS: In a clinical series of 448 women with operable breast cancer, the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test were used to estimate the likelihood of cancer recurrence and death. The Cox proportional hazard model was used for the multivariate analyses including mode of detection, age at diagnosis, tumour size, and lymph node status. These same models were applied to subgroups defined by molecular subtypes. RESULTS: Screen detected breast cancers tended to show more favourable clinicopathological features and survival outcomes compared to symptomatic cancers. The luminal A subtype was more common in women with mammography detected tumours than in symptomatic patients (68.5 vs. 59.0%, p=0.04). Data analysis across categories of molecular subtypes revealed significantly longer disease free and overall survival for screen detected cancers with a luminal A subtype only (p=0.01 and 0.02, respectively). For women with a luminal A subtype, the independent prognostic role of mode of detection on recurrence was confirmed in Cox proportional hazard models (p=0.03). An independent role of modality of detection on survival was also suggested (p=0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Molecular subtypes did not substantially explain the differences in survival outcomes between screened and symptomatic patients. However, our results suggest that molecular profiles might play a role in interpreting such differences at least partially. Further studies are warranted to reinterpret the efficacy of screening programmes in the light of tumour biology.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3598199
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35981992013-03-16 Molecular profiles of screen detected vs. symptomatic breast cancer and their impact on survival: results from a clinical series Crispo, Anna Barba, Maddalena D’Aiuto, Giuseppe De Laurentiis, Michelino Grimaldi, Maria Rinaldo, Massimo Caolo, Giuseppina D’Aiuto, Massimiliano Capasso, Immacolata Esposito, Emanuela Amore, Alfonso Di Bonito, Maurizio Botti, Gerardo Montella, Maurizio BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: Stage shift is widely considered a major determinant of the survival benefit conferred by breast cancer screening. However, factors and mechanisms underlying such a prognostic advantage need further clarification. We sought to compare the molecular characteristics of screen detected vs. symptomatic breast cancers and assess whether differences in tumour biology might translate into survival benefit. METHODS: In a clinical series of 448 women with operable breast cancer, the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test were used to estimate the likelihood of cancer recurrence and death. The Cox proportional hazard model was used for the multivariate analyses including mode of detection, age at diagnosis, tumour size, and lymph node status. These same models were applied to subgroups defined by molecular subtypes. RESULTS: Screen detected breast cancers tended to show more favourable clinicopathological features and survival outcomes compared to symptomatic cancers. The luminal A subtype was more common in women with mammography detected tumours than in symptomatic patients (68.5 vs. 59.0%, p=0.04). Data analysis across categories of molecular subtypes revealed significantly longer disease free and overall survival for screen detected cancers with a luminal A subtype only (p=0.01 and 0.02, respectively). For women with a luminal A subtype, the independent prognostic role of mode of detection on recurrence was confirmed in Cox proportional hazard models (p=0.03). An independent role of modality of detection on survival was also suggested (p=0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Molecular subtypes did not substantially explain the differences in survival outcomes between screened and symptomatic patients. However, our results suggest that molecular profiles might play a role in interpreting such differences at least partially. Further studies are warranted to reinterpret the efficacy of screening programmes in the light of tumour biology. BioMed Central 2013-01-10 /pmc/articles/PMC3598199/ /pubmed/23305429 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-13-15 Text en Copyright ©2013 Crispo et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Crispo, Anna
Barba, Maddalena
D’Aiuto, Giuseppe
De Laurentiis, Michelino
Grimaldi, Maria
Rinaldo, Massimo
Caolo, Giuseppina
D’Aiuto, Massimiliano
Capasso, Immacolata
Esposito, Emanuela
Amore, Alfonso
Di Bonito, Maurizio
Botti, Gerardo
Montella, Maurizio
Molecular profiles of screen detected vs. symptomatic breast cancer and their impact on survival: results from a clinical series
title Molecular profiles of screen detected vs. symptomatic breast cancer and their impact on survival: results from a clinical series
title_full Molecular profiles of screen detected vs. symptomatic breast cancer and their impact on survival: results from a clinical series
title_fullStr Molecular profiles of screen detected vs. symptomatic breast cancer and their impact on survival: results from a clinical series
title_full_unstemmed Molecular profiles of screen detected vs. symptomatic breast cancer and their impact on survival: results from a clinical series
title_short Molecular profiles of screen detected vs. symptomatic breast cancer and their impact on survival: results from a clinical series
title_sort molecular profiles of screen detected vs. symptomatic breast cancer and their impact on survival: results from a clinical series
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3598199/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23305429
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-13-15
work_keys_str_mv AT crispoanna molecularprofilesofscreendetectedvssymptomaticbreastcancerandtheirimpactonsurvivalresultsfromaclinicalseries
AT barbamaddalena molecularprofilesofscreendetectedvssymptomaticbreastcancerandtheirimpactonsurvivalresultsfromaclinicalseries
AT daiutogiuseppe molecularprofilesofscreendetectedvssymptomaticbreastcancerandtheirimpactonsurvivalresultsfromaclinicalseries
AT delaurentiismichelino molecularprofilesofscreendetectedvssymptomaticbreastcancerandtheirimpactonsurvivalresultsfromaclinicalseries
AT grimaldimaria molecularprofilesofscreendetectedvssymptomaticbreastcancerandtheirimpactonsurvivalresultsfromaclinicalseries
AT rinaldomassimo molecularprofilesofscreendetectedvssymptomaticbreastcancerandtheirimpactonsurvivalresultsfromaclinicalseries
AT caologiuseppina molecularprofilesofscreendetectedvssymptomaticbreastcancerandtheirimpactonsurvivalresultsfromaclinicalseries
AT daiutomassimiliano molecularprofilesofscreendetectedvssymptomaticbreastcancerandtheirimpactonsurvivalresultsfromaclinicalseries
AT capassoimmacolata molecularprofilesofscreendetectedvssymptomaticbreastcancerandtheirimpactonsurvivalresultsfromaclinicalseries
AT espositoemanuela molecularprofilesofscreendetectedvssymptomaticbreastcancerandtheirimpactonsurvivalresultsfromaclinicalseries
AT amorealfonso molecularprofilesofscreendetectedvssymptomaticbreastcancerandtheirimpactonsurvivalresultsfromaclinicalseries
AT dibonitomaurizio molecularprofilesofscreendetectedvssymptomaticbreastcancerandtheirimpactonsurvivalresultsfromaclinicalseries
AT bottigerardo molecularprofilesofscreendetectedvssymptomaticbreastcancerandtheirimpactonsurvivalresultsfromaclinicalseries
AT montellamaurizio molecularprofilesofscreendetectedvssymptomaticbreastcancerandtheirimpactonsurvivalresultsfromaclinicalseries