Cargando…

Knowledge brokers in a knowledge network: the case of Seniors Health Research Transfer Network knowledge brokers

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this paper is to describe and reflect on the role of knowledge brokers (KBs) in the Seniors Health Research Transfer Network (SHRTN). The paper reviews the relevant literature on knowledge brokering, and then describes the evolving role of knowledge brokering in this knowl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Conklin, James, Lusk, Elizabeth, Harris, Megan, Stolee, Paul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3598713/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23302517
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-8-7
_version_ 1782262806486188032
author Conklin, James
Lusk, Elizabeth
Harris, Megan
Stolee, Paul
author_facet Conklin, James
Lusk, Elizabeth
Harris, Megan
Stolee, Paul
author_sort Conklin, James
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The purpose of this paper is to describe and reflect on the role of knowledge brokers (KBs) in the Seniors Health Research Transfer Network (SHRTN). The paper reviews the relevant literature on knowledge brokering, and then describes the evolving role of knowledge brokering in this knowledge network. METHODS: The description of knowledge brokering provided here is based on a developmental evaluation program and on the experiences of the authors. Data were gathered through qualitative and quantitative methods, analyzed by the evaluators, and interpreted by network members who participated in sensemaking forums. The results were fed back to the network each year in the form of formal written reports that were widely distributed to network members, as well as through presentations to the network’s members. RESULTS: The SHRTN evaluation and our experiences as evaluators and KBs suggest that a SHRTN KB facilitates processes of learning whereby people are connected with tacit or explicit knowledge sources that will help them to resolve work-related challenges. To make this happen, KBs engage in a set of relational, technical, and analytical activities that help communities of practice (CoPs) to develop and operate, facilitate exchanges among people with similar concerns and interests, and help groups and individuals to create, explore, and apply knowledge in their practice. We also suggest that the role is difficult to define, emergent, abstract, episodic, and not fully understood. CONCLUSIONS: The KB role within this knowledge network has developed and matured over time. The KB adapts to the social and technical affordances of each situation, and fashions a unique and relevant process to create relationships and promote learning and change. The ability to work with teams and to develop relevant models and feasible approaches are critical KB skills. The KB is a leader who wields influence rather than power, and who is prepared to adopt whatever roles and approaches are needed to bring about a valuable result.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3598713
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35987132013-03-16 Knowledge brokers in a knowledge network: the case of Seniors Health Research Transfer Network knowledge brokers Conklin, James Lusk, Elizabeth Harris, Megan Stolee, Paul Implement Sci Research BACKGROUND: The purpose of this paper is to describe and reflect on the role of knowledge brokers (KBs) in the Seniors Health Research Transfer Network (SHRTN). The paper reviews the relevant literature on knowledge brokering, and then describes the evolving role of knowledge brokering in this knowledge network. METHODS: The description of knowledge brokering provided here is based on a developmental evaluation program and on the experiences of the authors. Data were gathered through qualitative and quantitative methods, analyzed by the evaluators, and interpreted by network members who participated in sensemaking forums. The results were fed back to the network each year in the form of formal written reports that were widely distributed to network members, as well as through presentations to the network’s members. RESULTS: The SHRTN evaluation and our experiences as evaluators and KBs suggest that a SHRTN KB facilitates processes of learning whereby people are connected with tacit or explicit knowledge sources that will help them to resolve work-related challenges. To make this happen, KBs engage in a set of relational, technical, and analytical activities that help communities of practice (CoPs) to develop and operate, facilitate exchanges among people with similar concerns and interests, and help groups and individuals to create, explore, and apply knowledge in their practice. We also suggest that the role is difficult to define, emergent, abstract, episodic, and not fully understood. CONCLUSIONS: The KB role within this knowledge network has developed and matured over time. The KB adapts to the social and technical affordances of each situation, and fashions a unique and relevant process to create relationships and promote learning and change. The ability to work with teams and to develop relevant models and feasible approaches are critical KB skills. The KB is a leader who wields influence rather than power, and who is prepared to adopt whatever roles and approaches are needed to bring about a valuable result. BioMed Central 2013-01-09 /pmc/articles/PMC3598713/ /pubmed/23302517 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-8-7 Text en Copyright ©2013 Conklin et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Conklin, James
Lusk, Elizabeth
Harris, Megan
Stolee, Paul
Knowledge brokers in a knowledge network: the case of Seniors Health Research Transfer Network knowledge brokers
title Knowledge brokers in a knowledge network: the case of Seniors Health Research Transfer Network knowledge brokers
title_full Knowledge brokers in a knowledge network: the case of Seniors Health Research Transfer Network knowledge brokers
title_fullStr Knowledge brokers in a knowledge network: the case of Seniors Health Research Transfer Network knowledge brokers
title_full_unstemmed Knowledge brokers in a knowledge network: the case of Seniors Health Research Transfer Network knowledge brokers
title_short Knowledge brokers in a knowledge network: the case of Seniors Health Research Transfer Network knowledge brokers
title_sort knowledge brokers in a knowledge network: the case of seniors health research transfer network knowledge brokers
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3598713/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23302517
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-8-7
work_keys_str_mv AT conklinjames knowledgebrokersinaknowledgenetworkthecaseofseniorshealthresearchtransfernetworkknowledgebrokers
AT luskelizabeth knowledgebrokersinaknowledgenetworkthecaseofseniorshealthresearchtransfernetworkknowledgebrokers
AT harrismegan knowledgebrokersinaknowledgenetworkthecaseofseniorshealthresearchtransfernetworkknowledgebrokers
AT stoleepaul knowledgebrokersinaknowledgenetworkthecaseofseniorshealthresearchtransfernetworkknowledgebrokers