Cargando…

The Effects of Visual Control and Distance in Modulating Peripersonal Spatial Representation

In the presence of vision, finalized motor acts can trigger spatial remapping, i.e., reference frames transformations to allow for a better interaction with targets. However, it is yet unclear how the peripersonal space is encoded and remapped depending on the availability of visual feedback and on...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Renzi, Chiara, Ricciardi, Emiliano, Bonino, Daniela, Handjaras, Giacomo, Vecchi, Tomaso, Pietrini, Pietro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3598753/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23555037
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059460
_version_ 1782262814969167872
author Renzi, Chiara
Ricciardi, Emiliano
Bonino, Daniela
Handjaras, Giacomo
Vecchi, Tomaso
Pietrini, Pietro
author_facet Renzi, Chiara
Ricciardi, Emiliano
Bonino, Daniela
Handjaras, Giacomo
Vecchi, Tomaso
Pietrini, Pietro
author_sort Renzi, Chiara
collection PubMed
description In the presence of vision, finalized motor acts can trigger spatial remapping, i.e., reference frames transformations to allow for a better interaction with targets. However, it is yet unclear how the peripersonal space is encoded and remapped depending on the availability of visual feedback and on the target position within the individual’s reachable space, and which cerebral areas subserve such processes. Here, functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was used to examine neural activity while healthy young participants performed reach-to-grasp movements with and without visual feedback and at different distances of the target from the effector (near to the hand–about 15 cm from the starting position–vs. far from the hand–about 30 cm from the starting position). Brain response in the superior parietal lobule bilaterally, in the right dorsal premotor cortex, and in the anterior part of the right inferior parietal lobule was significantly greater during visually-guided grasping of targets located at the far distance compared to grasping of targets located near to the hand. In the absence of visual feedback, the inferior parietal lobule exhibited a greater activity during grasping of targets at the near compared to the far distance. Results suggest that in the presence of visual feedback, a visuo-motor circuit integrates visuo-motor information when targets are located farther away. Conversely in the absence of visual feedback, encoding of space may demand multisensory remapping processes, even in the case of more proximal targets.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3598753
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35987532013-04-02 The Effects of Visual Control and Distance in Modulating Peripersonal Spatial Representation Renzi, Chiara Ricciardi, Emiliano Bonino, Daniela Handjaras, Giacomo Vecchi, Tomaso Pietrini, Pietro PLoS One Research Article In the presence of vision, finalized motor acts can trigger spatial remapping, i.e., reference frames transformations to allow for a better interaction with targets. However, it is yet unclear how the peripersonal space is encoded and remapped depending on the availability of visual feedback and on the target position within the individual’s reachable space, and which cerebral areas subserve such processes. Here, functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was used to examine neural activity while healthy young participants performed reach-to-grasp movements with and without visual feedback and at different distances of the target from the effector (near to the hand–about 15 cm from the starting position–vs. far from the hand–about 30 cm from the starting position). Brain response in the superior parietal lobule bilaterally, in the right dorsal premotor cortex, and in the anterior part of the right inferior parietal lobule was significantly greater during visually-guided grasping of targets located at the far distance compared to grasping of targets located near to the hand. In the absence of visual feedback, the inferior parietal lobule exhibited a greater activity during grasping of targets at the near compared to the far distance. Results suggest that in the presence of visual feedback, a visuo-motor circuit integrates visuo-motor information when targets are located farther away. Conversely in the absence of visual feedback, encoding of space may demand multisensory remapping processes, even in the case of more proximal targets. Public Library of Science 2013-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC3598753/ /pubmed/23555037 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059460 Text en © 2013 Renzi et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Renzi, Chiara
Ricciardi, Emiliano
Bonino, Daniela
Handjaras, Giacomo
Vecchi, Tomaso
Pietrini, Pietro
The Effects of Visual Control and Distance in Modulating Peripersonal Spatial Representation
title The Effects of Visual Control and Distance in Modulating Peripersonal Spatial Representation
title_full The Effects of Visual Control and Distance in Modulating Peripersonal Spatial Representation
title_fullStr The Effects of Visual Control and Distance in Modulating Peripersonal Spatial Representation
title_full_unstemmed The Effects of Visual Control and Distance in Modulating Peripersonal Spatial Representation
title_short The Effects of Visual Control and Distance in Modulating Peripersonal Spatial Representation
title_sort effects of visual control and distance in modulating peripersonal spatial representation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3598753/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23555037
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059460
work_keys_str_mv AT renzichiara theeffectsofvisualcontrolanddistanceinmodulatingperipersonalspatialrepresentation
AT ricciardiemiliano theeffectsofvisualcontrolanddistanceinmodulatingperipersonalspatialrepresentation
AT boninodaniela theeffectsofvisualcontrolanddistanceinmodulatingperipersonalspatialrepresentation
AT handjarasgiacomo theeffectsofvisualcontrolanddistanceinmodulatingperipersonalspatialrepresentation
AT vecchitomaso theeffectsofvisualcontrolanddistanceinmodulatingperipersonalspatialrepresentation
AT pietrinipietro theeffectsofvisualcontrolanddistanceinmodulatingperipersonalspatialrepresentation
AT renzichiara effectsofvisualcontrolanddistanceinmodulatingperipersonalspatialrepresentation
AT ricciardiemiliano effectsofvisualcontrolanddistanceinmodulatingperipersonalspatialrepresentation
AT boninodaniela effectsofvisualcontrolanddistanceinmodulatingperipersonalspatialrepresentation
AT handjarasgiacomo effectsofvisualcontrolanddistanceinmodulatingperipersonalspatialrepresentation
AT vecchitomaso effectsofvisualcontrolanddistanceinmodulatingperipersonalspatialrepresentation
AT pietrinipietro effectsofvisualcontrolanddistanceinmodulatingperipersonalspatialrepresentation