Cargando…
The Effects of Visual Control and Distance in Modulating Peripersonal Spatial Representation
In the presence of vision, finalized motor acts can trigger spatial remapping, i.e., reference frames transformations to allow for a better interaction with targets. However, it is yet unclear how the peripersonal space is encoded and remapped depending on the availability of visual feedback and on...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3598753/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23555037 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059460 |
_version_ | 1782262814969167872 |
---|---|
author | Renzi, Chiara Ricciardi, Emiliano Bonino, Daniela Handjaras, Giacomo Vecchi, Tomaso Pietrini, Pietro |
author_facet | Renzi, Chiara Ricciardi, Emiliano Bonino, Daniela Handjaras, Giacomo Vecchi, Tomaso Pietrini, Pietro |
author_sort | Renzi, Chiara |
collection | PubMed |
description | In the presence of vision, finalized motor acts can trigger spatial remapping, i.e., reference frames transformations to allow for a better interaction with targets. However, it is yet unclear how the peripersonal space is encoded and remapped depending on the availability of visual feedback and on the target position within the individual’s reachable space, and which cerebral areas subserve such processes. Here, functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was used to examine neural activity while healthy young participants performed reach-to-grasp movements with and without visual feedback and at different distances of the target from the effector (near to the hand–about 15 cm from the starting position–vs. far from the hand–about 30 cm from the starting position). Brain response in the superior parietal lobule bilaterally, in the right dorsal premotor cortex, and in the anterior part of the right inferior parietal lobule was significantly greater during visually-guided grasping of targets located at the far distance compared to grasping of targets located near to the hand. In the absence of visual feedback, the inferior parietal lobule exhibited a greater activity during grasping of targets at the near compared to the far distance. Results suggest that in the presence of visual feedback, a visuo-motor circuit integrates visuo-motor information when targets are located farther away. Conversely in the absence of visual feedback, encoding of space may demand multisensory remapping processes, even in the case of more proximal targets. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3598753 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35987532013-04-02 The Effects of Visual Control and Distance in Modulating Peripersonal Spatial Representation Renzi, Chiara Ricciardi, Emiliano Bonino, Daniela Handjaras, Giacomo Vecchi, Tomaso Pietrini, Pietro PLoS One Research Article In the presence of vision, finalized motor acts can trigger spatial remapping, i.e., reference frames transformations to allow for a better interaction with targets. However, it is yet unclear how the peripersonal space is encoded and remapped depending on the availability of visual feedback and on the target position within the individual’s reachable space, and which cerebral areas subserve such processes. Here, functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was used to examine neural activity while healthy young participants performed reach-to-grasp movements with and without visual feedback and at different distances of the target from the effector (near to the hand–about 15 cm from the starting position–vs. far from the hand–about 30 cm from the starting position). Brain response in the superior parietal lobule bilaterally, in the right dorsal premotor cortex, and in the anterior part of the right inferior parietal lobule was significantly greater during visually-guided grasping of targets located at the far distance compared to grasping of targets located near to the hand. In the absence of visual feedback, the inferior parietal lobule exhibited a greater activity during grasping of targets at the near compared to the far distance. Results suggest that in the presence of visual feedback, a visuo-motor circuit integrates visuo-motor information when targets are located farther away. Conversely in the absence of visual feedback, encoding of space may demand multisensory remapping processes, even in the case of more proximal targets. Public Library of Science 2013-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC3598753/ /pubmed/23555037 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059460 Text en © 2013 Renzi et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Renzi, Chiara Ricciardi, Emiliano Bonino, Daniela Handjaras, Giacomo Vecchi, Tomaso Pietrini, Pietro The Effects of Visual Control and Distance in Modulating Peripersonal Spatial Representation |
title | The Effects of Visual Control and Distance in Modulating Peripersonal Spatial Representation |
title_full | The Effects of Visual Control and Distance in Modulating Peripersonal Spatial Representation |
title_fullStr | The Effects of Visual Control and Distance in Modulating Peripersonal Spatial Representation |
title_full_unstemmed | The Effects of Visual Control and Distance in Modulating Peripersonal Spatial Representation |
title_short | The Effects of Visual Control and Distance in Modulating Peripersonal Spatial Representation |
title_sort | effects of visual control and distance in modulating peripersonal spatial representation |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3598753/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23555037 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059460 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT renzichiara theeffectsofvisualcontrolanddistanceinmodulatingperipersonalspatialrepresentation AT ricciardiemiliano theeffectsofvisualcontrolanddistanceinmodulatingperipersonalspatialrepresentation AT boninodaniela theeffectsofvisualcontrolanddistanceinmodulatingperipersonalspatialrepresentation AT handjarasgiacomo theeffectsofvisualcontrolanddistanceinmodulatingperipersonalspatialrepresentation AT vecchitomaso theeffectsofvisualcontrolanddistanceinmodulatingperipersonalspatialrepresentation AT pietrinipietro theeffectsofvisualcontrolanddistanceinmodulatingperipersonalspatialrepresentation AT renzichiara effectsofvisualcontrolanddistanceinmodulatingperipersonalspatialrepresentation AT ricciardiemiliano effectsofvisualcontrolanddistanceinmodulatingperipersonalspatialrepresentation AT boninodaniela effectsofvisualcontrolanddistanceinmodulatingperipersonalspatialrepresentation AT handjarasgiacomo effectsofvisualcontrolanddistanceinmodulatingperipersonalspatialrepresentation AT vecchitomaso effectsofvisualcontrolanddistanceinmodulatingperipersonalspatialrepresentation AT pietrinipietro effectsofvisualcontrolanddistanceinmodulatingperipersonalspatialrepresentation |