Cargando…

Using hospital discharge data to identify incident pregnancy-associated cancers: a validation study

BACKGROUND: Pregnancy-associated cancer is associated with maternal morbidities and adverse pregnancy outcomes, and is reported to be increasing. Hospital discharge data have the potential to provide timely information on cancer incidence, which is central to evaluation and improvement of clinical c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Yuen Yi Cathy, Roberts, Christine L, Young, Jane, Dobbins, Timothy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3598759/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23398861
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-13-37
_version_ 1782262816105824256
author Lee, Yuen Yi Cathy
Roberts, Christine L
Young, Jane
Dobbins, Timothy
author_facet Lee, Yuen Yi Cathy
Roberts, Christine L
Young, Jane
Dobbins, Timothy
author_sort Lee, Yuen Yi Cathy
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Pregnancy-associated cancer is associated with maternal morbidities and adverse pregnancy outcomes, and is reported to be increasing. Hospital discharge data have the potential to provide timely information on cancer incidence, which is central to evaluation and improvement of clinical care for women. This study aimed to assess the validity of hospital data for identifying incident pregnancy-associated cancers compared with incident cancers from an Australian population-based statutory cancer registry. METHODS: Birth data from 2001–2008, comprised 470,277 women with 679,736 maternities, were linked to cancer registry and hospitalisation records to identify newly diagnosed cancers during pregnancy or within 12 months of delivery. Two hospital-identified cancer groups were examined; “index cancer hospitalisation” – first cancer admission per woman per pregnancy and “all cancer hospitalisations” –the total number of hospitalisations with a cancer diagnosis and women could have multiple hospitalisations during pregnancy. The latter replicates a scenario where identification of individuals is not possible and hospitalisations are used as the unit of analysis. RESULTS: The incidence of pregnancy-associated cancer (according to cancer registry) was 145.4/100,000 maternities. Incidence of cancer was substantially over-estimated when using hospitalisations as the unit of analysis (incidence rate ratio, IRR 1.7) and under-estimated when using the individual (IRR 0.8). Overall, the sensitivity of “index cancer hospitalisation” was 60.4%, positive predictive value (PPV) 77.7%, specificity and negative predictive value both 100%. Melanoma ascertainment was only 36.1% and breast cancer 62.9%. For other common cancers sensitivities ranged from 72.1% to 78.6% and PPVs 56.4% to 87.3%. CONCLUSION: Although hospital data provide another timely source of cancer identification, the validity is insufficient to obtain cancer incidence estimates for the obstetric population.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3598759
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35987592013-03-16 Using hospital discharge data to identify incident pregnancy-associated cancers: a validation study Lee, Yuen Yi Cathy Roberts, Christine L Young, Jane Dobbins, Timothy BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: Pregnancy-associated cancer is associated with maternal morbidities and adverse pregnancy outcomes, and is reported to be increasing. Hospital discharge data have the potential to provide timely information on cancer incidence, which is central to evaluation and improvement of clinical care for women. This study aimed to assess the validity of hospital data for identifying incident pregnancy-associated cancers compared with incident cancers from an Australian population-based statutory cancer registry. METHODS: Birth data from 2001–2008, comprised 470,277 women with 679,736 maternities, were linked to cancer registry and hospitalisation records to identify newly diagnosed cancers during pregnancy or within 12 months of delivery. Two hospital-identified cancer groups were examined; “index cancer hospitalisation” – first cancer admission per woman per pregnancy and “all cancer hospitalisations” –the total number of hospitalisations with a cancer diagnosis and women could have multiple hospitalisations during pregnancy. The latter replicates a scenario where identification of individuals is not possible and hospitalisations are used as the unit of analysis. RESULTS: The incidence of pregnancy-associated cancer (according to cancer registry) was 145.4/100,000 maternities. Incidence of cancer was substantially over-estimated when using hospitalisations as the unit of analysis (incidence rate ratio, IRR 1.7) and under-estimated when using the individual (IRR 0.8). Overall, the sensitivity of “index cancer hospitalisation” was 60.4%, positive predictive value (PPV) 77.7%, specificity and negative predictive value both 100%. Melanoma ascertainment was only 36.1% and breast cancer 62.9%. For other common cancers sensitivities ranged from 72.1% to 78.6% and PPVs 56.4% to 87.3%. CONCLUSION: Although hospital data provide another timely source of cancer identification, the validity is insufficient to obtain cancer incidence estimates for the obstetric population. BioMed Central 2013-02-11 /pmc/articles/PMC3598759/ /pubmed/23398861 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-13-37 Text en Copyright ©2013 Lee et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lee, Yuen Yi Cathy
Roberts, Christine L
Young, Jane
Dobbins, Timothy
Using hospital discharge data to identify incident pregnancy-associated cancers: a validation study
title Using hospital discharge data to identify incident pregnancy-associated cancers: a validation study
title_full Using hospital discharge data to identify incident pregnancy-associated cancers: a validation study
title_fullStr Using hospital discharge data to identify incident pregnancy-associated cancers: a validation study
title_full_unstemmed Using hospital discharge data to identify incident pregnancy-associated cancers: a validation study
title_short Using hospital discharge data to identify incident pregnancy-associated cancers: a validation study
title_sort using hospital discharge data to identify incident pregnancy-associated cancers: a validation study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3598759/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23398861
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-13-37
work_keys_str_mv AT leeyuenyicathy usinghospitaldischargedatatoidentifyincidentpregnancyassociatedcancersavalidationstudy
AT robertschristinel usinghospitaldischargedatatoidentifyincidentpregnancyassociatedcancersavalidationstudy
AT youngjane usinghospitaldischargedatatoidentifyincidentpregnancyassociatedcancersavalidationstudy
AT dobbinstimothy usinghospitaldischargedatatoidentifyincidentpregnancyassociatedcancersavalidationstudy