Cargando…
Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial for anterior inguinal hernia repair: transrectus sheath preperitoneal mesh repair compared to transinguinal preperitoneal procedure
BACKGROUND: Anterior open treatment of the inguinal hernia with a tension-free mesh has reduced the incidence of hernia recurrence. The Lichtenstein procedure is the current reference technique for inguinal hernia treatment. Chronic pain has become the main postoperative complication after surgical...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3598762/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23452397 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-14-65 |
_version_ | 1782262816556711936 |
---|---|
author | Prins, M Wiesje Koning, Giel G Keus, Eric F Vriens, Patrick WHE Mollen, Roland MHG Akkersdijk, Willem L van Laarhoven, Cees JHM |
author_facet | Prins, M Wiesje Koning, Giel G Keus, Eric F Vriens, Patrick WHE Mollen, Roland MHG Akkersdijk, Willem L van Laarhoven, Cees JHM |
author_sort | Prins, M Wiesje |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Anterior open treatment of the inguinal hernia with a tension-free mesh has reduced the incidence of hernia recurrence. The Lichtenstein procedure is the current reference technique for inguinal hernia treatment. Chronic pain has become the main postoperative complication after surgical inguinal hernia repair, especially following Lichtenstein. Preliminary experiences with a soft mesh positioned in the preperitoneal space (PPS) by transinguinal preperitoneal (TIPP) or total extraperitoneal (TEP) technique, showed promising results considering the reduction of postoperative chronic pain. Evolution of surgical innovations for inguinal hernia repair led to an open, direct approach with preperitoneal mesh position, such as TIPP. Based on the TIPP procedure, another preperitoneal repair has been recently developed, the transrectus sheath preperitoneal (TREPP) mesh repair. METHODS: The ENTREPPMENT trial is a multicentre randomized clinical trial. Patients will be randomly allocated to anterior inguinal hernia repair according to the TREPP mesh repair or TIPP procedure. All patients with a primary unilateral inguinal hernia, eligible for operation, will be invited to participate in the trial. The primary outcome measure will be the number of patients with postoperative chronic pain. Secondary outcome measures will be serious adverse events (SAEs), including recurrence, hemorrhage, return to daily activities (for example work), operative time and hospital stay. Alongside the trial health status, an economic evaluation will be performed. To demonstrate that inguinal hernia repair according to the TREPP technique reduces the percentage of patients with postoperative chronic pain from 12% to <6%, a sample size of 800 patients is required (two-sided test, α = 0.05, 80% power).The ENTREPPMENT trial aims to evaluate the TREPP and TIPP procedures from patients’ perspective. It is hypothesized that the TREPP technique may reduce the number of patients with any form of postoperative chronic pain by 50% compared to the TIPP procedure. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials: ISRCTN18591339 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3598762 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35987622013-03-16 Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial for anterior inguinal hernia repair: transrectus sheath preperitoneal mesh repair compared to transinguinal preperitoneal procedure Prins, M Wiesje Koning, Giel G Keus, Eric F Vriens, Patrick WHE Mollen, Roland MHG Akkersdijk, Willem L van Laarhoven, Cees JHM Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Anterior open treatment of the inguinal hernia with a tension-free mesh has reduced the incidence of hernia recurrence. The Lichtenstein procedure is the current reference technique for inguinal hernia treatment. Chronic pain has become the main postoperative complication after surgical inguinal hernia repair, especially following Lichtenstein. Preliminary experiences with a soft mesh positioned in the preperitoneal space (PPS) by transinguinal preperitoneal (TIPP) or total extraperitoneal (TEP) technique, showed promising results considering the reduction of postoperative chronic pain. Evolution of surgical innovations for inguinal hernia repair led to an open, direct approach with preperitoneal mesh position, such as TIPP. Based on the TIPP procedure, another preperitoneal repair has been recently developed, the transrectus sheath preperitoneal (TREPP) mesh repair. METHODS: The ENTREPPMENT trial is a multicentre randomized clinical trial. Patients will be randomly allocated to anterior inguinal hernia repair according to the TREPP mesh repair or TIPP procedure. All patients with a primary unilateral inguinal hernia, eligible for operation, will be invited to participate in the trial. The primary outcome measure will be the number of patients with postoperative chronic pain. Secondary outcome measures will be serious adverse events (SAEs), including recurrence, hemorrhage, return to daily activities (for example work), operative time and hospital stay. Alongside the trial health status, an economic evaluation will be performed. To demonstrate that inguinal hernia repair according to the TREPP technique reduces the percentage of patients with postoperative chronic pain from 12% to <6%, a sample size of 800 patients is required (two-sided test, α = 0.05, 80% power).The ENTREPPMENT trial aims to evaluate the TREPP and TIPP procedures from patients’ perspective. It is hypothesized that the TREPP technique may reduce the number of patients with any form of postoperative chronic pain by 50% compared to the TIPP procedure. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials: ISRCTN18591339 BioMed Central 2013-03-03 /pmc/articles/PMC3598762/ /pubmed/23452397 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-14-65 Text en Copyright ©2013 Prins et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Prins, M Wiesje Koning, Giel G Keus, Eric F Vriens, Patrick WHE Mollen, Roland MHG Akkersdijk, Willem L van Laarhoven, Cees JHM Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial for anterior inguinal hernia repair: transrectus sheath preperitoneal mesh repair compared to transinguinal preperitoneal procedure |
title | Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial for anterior inguinal hernia repair: transrectus sheath preperitoneal mesh repair compared to transinguinal preperitoneal procedure |
title_full | Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial for anterior inguinal hernia repair: transrectus sheath preperitoneal mesh repair compared to transinguinal preperitoneal procedure |
title_fullStr | Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial for anterior inguinal hernia repair: transrectus sheath preperitoneal mesh repair compared to transinguinal preperitoneal procedure |
title_full_unstemmed | Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial for anterior inguinal hernia repair: transrectus sheath preperitoneal mesh repair compared to transinguinal preperitoneal procedure |
title_short | Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial for anterior inguinal hernia repair: transrectus sheath preperitoneal mesh repair compared to transinguinal preperitoneal procedure |
title_sort | study protocol for a randomized controlled trial for anterior inguinal hernia repair: transrectus sheath preperitoneal mesh repair compared to transinguinal preperitoneal procedure |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3598762/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23452397 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-14-65 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT prinsmwiesje studyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrialforanterioringuinalherniarepairtransrectussheathpreperitonealmeshrepaircomparedtotransinguinalpreperitonealprocedure AT koninggielg studyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrialforanterioringuinalherniarepairtransrectussheathpreperitonealmeshrepaircomparedtotransinguinalpreperitonealprocedure AT keusericf studyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrialforanterioringuinalherniarepairtransrectussheathpreperitonealmeshrepaircomparedtotransinguinalpreperitonealprocedure AT vrienspatrickwhe studyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrialforanterioringuinalherniarepairtransrectussheathpreperitonealmeshrepaircomparedtotransinguinalpreperitonealprocedure AT mollenrolandmhg studyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrialforanterioringuinalherniarepairtransrectussheathpreperitonealmeshrepaircomparedtotransinguinalpreperitonealprocedure AT akkersdijkwilleml studyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrialforanterioringuinalherniarepairtransrectussheathpreperitonealmeshrepaircomparedtotransinguinalpreperitonealprocedure AT vanlaarhovenceesjhm studyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrialforanterioringuinalherniarepairtransrectussheathpreperitonealmeshrepaircomparedtotransinguinalpreperitonealprocedure |