Cargando…

A comparison between two types of limited sympathetic surgery for palmar hyperhidrosis

PURPOSE: Endoscopic thoracic sympathetic surgery is effective for treating palmar hyperhidrosis, although compensatory sweating (CS) is a significant and annoying side effect. The purpose of this study was to compare the results of limited resection at two different locations. METHODS: From May 2004...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hwang, Jung Joo, Kim, Do Hyung, Hong, Yoon Joo, Lee, Doo Yun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Japan 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3599212/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22798011
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00595-012-0246-1
_version_ 1782262912001245184
author Hwang, Jung Joo
Kim, Do Hyung
Hong, Yoon Joo
Lee, Doo Yun
author_facet Hwang, Jung Joo
Kim, Do Hyung
Hong, Yoon Joo
Lee, Doo Yun
author_sort Hwang, Jung Joo
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Endoscopic thoracic sympathetic surgery is effective for treating palmar hyperhidrosis, although compensatory sweating (CS) is a significant and annoying side effect. The purpose of this study was to compare the results of limited resection at two different locations. METHODS: From May 2004 to June 2009, T3 sympathicotomy (group I) was performed in 46 patients and T3,4 ramicotomy (group II) was performed in 43 patients during the same period. T3 sympathicotomy (group I) and T3,4 ramicotomy (group II) were performed during the same period. Using questionnaires, completed by the patients, the satisfaction rates and grades of CS were analyzed. RESULTS: No significant differences in age distribution or sex ratios were observed between the two groups. The satisfaction rate was 91.3 % in group I and 79.1 % in group II. The operation time was 19.8 (±6.6) min in group I, and 51.6 (±18.8) min in group II, showing a statistically significant difference (p < 0.002). The incidence of persistent hand sweating in group II (16.3 %) was higher than that observed in group I (2.2 %). The incidence of compensatory sweating on the lower extremities was higher in group II (37.2 %) than in group I (10.9 %). CONCLUSIONS: Although ramicotomy is considered to be an effective method for treating hyperhidrosis and has a theoretical advantage of allowing greater anatomical resection, it requires longer operation time and induces more severe compensatory sweating in the lower limbs resulting in reduced satisfaction rates.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3599212
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Springer Japan
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35992122013-03-19 A comparison between two types of limited sympathetic surgery for palmar hyperhidrosis Hwang, Jung Joo Kim, Do Hyung Hong, Yoon Joo Lee, Doo Yun Surg Today Original Article PURPOSE: Endoscopic thoracic sympathetic surgery is effective for treating palmar hyperhidrosis, although compensatory sweating (CS) is a significant and annoying side effect. The purpose of this study was to compare the results of limited resection at two different locations. METHODS: From May 2004 to June 2009, T3 sympathicotomy (group I) was performed in 46 patients and T3,4 ramicotomy (group II) was performed in 43 patients during the same period. T3 sympathicotomy (group I) and T3,4 ramicotomy (group II) were performed during the same period. Using questionnaires, completed by the patients, the satisfaction rates and grades of CS were analyzed. RESULTS: No significant differences in age distribution or sex ratios were observed between the two groups. The satisfaction rate was 91.3 % in group I and 79.1 % in group II. The operation time was 19.8 (±6.6) min in group I, and 51.6 (±18.8) min in group II, showing a statistically significant difference (p < 0.002). The incidence of persistent hand sweating in group II (16.3 %) was higher than that observed in group I (2.2 %). The incidence of compensatory sweating on the lower extremities was higher in group II (37.2 %) than in group I (10.9 %). CONCLUSIONS: Although ramicotomy is considered to be an effective method for treating hyperhidrosis and has a theoretical advantage of allowing greater anatomical resection, it requires longer operation time and induces more severe compensatory sweating in the lower limbs resulting in reduced satisfaction rates. Springer Japan 2012-07-15 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC3599212/ /pubmed/22798011 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00595-012-0246-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2012 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Hwang, Jung Joo
Kim, Do Hyung
Hong, Yoon Joo
Lee, Doo Yun
A comparison between two types of limited sympathetic surgery for palmar hyperhidrosis
title A comparison between two types of limited sympathetic surgery for palmar hyperhidrosis
title_full A comparison between two types of limited sympathetic surgery for palmar hyperhidrosis
title_fullStr A comparison between two types of limited sympathetic surgery for palmar hyperhidrosis
title_full_unstemmed A comparison between two types of limited sympathetic surgery for palmar hyperhidrosis
title_short A comparison between two types of limited sympathetic surgery for palmar hyperhidrosis
title_sort comparison between two types of limited sympathetic surgery for palmar hyperhidrosis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3599212/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22798011
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00595-012-0246-1
work_keys_str_mv AT hwangjungjoo acomparisonbetweentwotypesoflimitedsympatheticsurgeryforpalmarhyperhidrosis
AT kimdohyung acomparisonbetweentwotypesoflimitedsympatheticsurgeryforpalmarhyperhidrosis
AT hongyoonjoo acomparisonbetweentwotypesoflimitedsympatheticsurgeryforpalmarhyperhidrosis
AT leedooyun acomparisonbetweentwotypesoflimitedsympatheticsurgeryforpalmarhyperhidrosis
AT hwangjungjoo comparisonbetweentwotypesoflimitedsympatheticsurgeryforpalmarhyperhidrosis
AT kimdohyung comparisonbetweentwotypesoflimitedsympatheticsurgeryforpalmarhyperhidrosis
AT hongyoonjoo comparisonbetweentwotypesoflimitedsympatheticsurgeryforpalmarhyperhidrosis
AT leedooyun comparisonbetweentwotypesoflimitedsympatheticsurgeryforpalmarhyperhidrosis