Cargando…

A retrospective analysis of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in ovarian cancer: do we still need it?

BACKGROUND: Ovarian cancer (OC) is the sixth most common cancer in women. Currently, carboplatin/paclitaxel ± bevacizumab is the cornerstone of front-line treatment. Conversely, the therapeutic options for recurrent or progressive disease are not well defined. For platinum-sensitive patients the bes...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Staropoli, Nicoletta, Ciliberto, Domenico, Botta, Cirino, Fiorillo, Lucia, Gualtieri, Simona, Salvino, Angela, Tassone, Pierfrancesco, Tagliaferri, Pierosandro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3599392/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23388584
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1757-2215-6-10
_version_ 1782262953082355712
author Staropoli, Nicoletta
Ciliberto, Domenico
Botta, Cirino
Fiorillo, Lucia
Gualtieri, Simona
Salvino, Angela
Tassone, Pierfrancesco
Tagliaferri, Pierosandro
author_facet Staropoli, Nicoletta
Ciliberto, Domenico
Botta, Cirino
Fiorillo, Lucia
Gualtieri, Simona
Salvino, Angela
Tassone, Pierfrancesco
Tagliaferri, Pierosandro
author_sort Staropoli, Nicoletta
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Ovarian cancer (OC) is the sixth most common cancer in women. Currently, carboplatin/paclitaxel ± bevacizumab is the cornerstone of front-line treatment. Conversely, the therapeutic options for recurrent or progressive disease are not well defined. For platinum-sensitive patients the best therapeutic approach is still a re-challenge with a platinum-based regimen. Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD), is considered one of the most active therapeutic options for recurrent or progressive OC. In this retrospective mono-institutional analysis, we evaluated the impact of PLD on the outcome of OC patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed the retrospective study on a cohort of 108 patients with histologically confirmed serous papillary OC, followed at our Institution between 2001 and 2011. 80 patients were in stage III/IV and 55 of them received a second-line treatment. Thirty patients were treated with PLD. Both groups (PLD-treated versus PLD-untreated) underwent a median of 3 treatment lines and were prognostically balanced. The median follow-up was 60 months. Survival endpoints, toxicity and correlations between patients’ baseline characteristics and treatment efficacy were evaluated. RESULTS: Patients who had undergone PLD treatment (PLD group) showed a median overall survival (OS) of 45 months as compared to 65 months of patients not treated with PLD (PLD-free group) (HR 2.50 [0.95-6.67; p = 0.06]). Moreover, the median progression-free survival was 6 months in the PLD group versus 10 months in the PLD-free group (HR 1.75 [0.94-3.34; p = 0.07]). The overall objective response rate in II line treatment was 43% (13% in PLD group versus 57% in PLD-free group). Furthermore, we investigated survival endpoints in platinum-refractory patients who received PLD at least once during the course of disease. No OS advantage was achieved by PLD administration when compared to other therapeutic options (30 versus 32 months; HR 1.16 [0.31-4.34; p = 0.81]). No difference in term of toxicity was observed among different groups. CONCLUSIONS: No evidence of superiority if PLD was compared to alternative agents was found in this analysis, particularly in the platinum-refractory setting. Our findings indicate a modest therapeutic activity of PLD in OC. Analysis of cost/benefit of PLD in OC is eagerly awaited.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3599392
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35993922013-03-17 A retrospective analysis of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in ovarian cancer: do we still need it? Staropoli, Nicoletta Ciliberto, Domenico Botta, Cirino Fiorillo, Lucia Gualtieri, Simona Salvino, Angela Tassone, Pierfrancesco Tagliaferri, Pierosandro J Ovarian Res Research BACKGROUND: Ovarian cancer (OC) is the sixth most common cancer in women. Currently, carboplatin/paclitaxel ± bevacizumab is the cornerstone of front-line treatment. Conversely, the therapeutic options for recurrent or progressive disease are not well defined. For platinum-sensitive patients the best therapeutic approach is still a re-challenge with a platinum-based regimen. Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD), is considered one of the most active therapeutic options for recurrent or progressive OC. In this retrospective mono-institutional analysis, we evaluated the impact of PLD on the outcome of OC patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed the retrospective study on a cohort of 108 patients with histologically confirmed serous papillary OC, followed at our Institution between 2001 and 2011. 80 patients were in stage III/IV and 55 of them received a second-line treatment. Thirty patients were treated with PLD. Both groups (PLD-treated versus PLD-untreated) underwent a median of 3 treatment lines and were prognostically balanced. The median follow-up was 60 months. Survival endpoints, toxicity and correlations between patients’ baseline characteristics and treatment efficacy were evaluated. RESULTS: Patients who had undergone PLD treatment (PLD group) showed a median overall survival (OS) of 45 months as compared to 65 months of patients not treated with PLD (PLD-free group) (HR 2.50 [0.95-6.67; p = 0.06]). Moreover, the median progression-free survival was 6 months in the PLD group versus 10 months in the PLD-free group (HR 1.75 [0.94-3.34; p = 0.07]). The overall objective response rate in II line treatment was 43% (13% in PLD group versus 57% in PLD-free group). Furthermore, we investigated survival endpoints in platinum-refractory patients who received PLD at least once during the course of disease. No OS advantage was achieved by PLD administration when compared to other therapeutic options (30 versus 32 months; HR 1.16 [0.31-4.34; p = 0.81]). No difference in term of toxicity was observed among different groups. CONCLUSIONS: No evidence of superiority if PLD was compared to alternative agents was found in this analysis, particularly in the platinum-refractory setting. Our findings indicate a modest therapeutic activity of PLD in OC. Analysis of cost/benefit of PLD in OC is eagerly awaited. BioMed Central 2013-02-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3599392/ /pubmed/23388584 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1757-2215-6-10 Text en Copyright ©2013 Staropoli et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Staropoli, Nicoletta
Ciliberto, Domenico
Botta, Cirino
Fiorillo, Lucia
Gualtieri, Simona
Salvino, Angela
Tassone, Pierfrancesco
Tagliaferri, Pierosandro
A retrospective analysis of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in ovarian cancer: do we still need it?
title A retrospective analysis of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in ovarian cancer: do we still need it?
title_full A retrospective analysis of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in ovarian cancer: do we still need it?
title_fullStr A retrospective analysis of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in ovarian cancer: do we still need it?
title_full_unstemmed A retrospective analysis of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in ovarian cancer: do we still need it?
title_short A retrospective analysis of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in ovarian cancer: do we still need it?
title_sort retrospective analysis of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in ovarian cancer: do we still need it?
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3599392/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23388584
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1757-2215-6-10
work_keys_str_mv AT staropolinicoletta aretrospectiveanalysisofpegylatedliposomaldoxorubicininovariancancerdowestillneedit
AT cilibertodomenico aretrospectiveanalysisofpegylatedliposomaldoxorubicininovariancancerdowestillneedit
AT bottacirino aretrospectiveanalysisofpegylatedliposomaldoxorubicininovariancancerdowestillneedit
AT fiorillolucia aretrospectiveanalysisofpegylatedliposomaldoxorubicininovariancancerdowestillneedit
AT gualtierisimona aretrospectiveanalysisofpegylatedliposomaldoxorubicininovariancancerdowestillneedit
AT salvinoangela aretrospectiveanalysisofpegylatedliposomaldoxorubicininovariancancerdowestillneedit
AT tassonepierfrancesco aretrospectiveanalysisofpegylatedliposomaldoxorubicininovariancancerdowestillneedit
AT tagliaferripierosandro aretrospectiveanalysisofpegylatedliposomaldoxorubicininovariancancerdowestillneedit
AT staropolinicoletta retrospectiveanalysisofpegylatedliposomaldoxorubicininovariancancerdowestillneedit
AT cilibertodomenico retrospectiveanalysisofpegylatedliposomaldoxorubicininovariancancerdowestillneedit
AT bottacirino retrospectiveanalysisofpegylatedliposomaldoxorubicininovariancancerdowestillneedit
AT fiorillolucia retrospectiveanalysisofpegylatedliposomaldoxorubicininovariancancerdowestillneedit
AT gualtierisimona retrospectiveanalysisofpegylatedliposomaldoxorubicininovariancancerdowestillneedit
AT salvinoangela retrospectiveanalysisofpegylatedliposomaldoxorubicininovariancancerdowestillneedit
AT tassonepierfrancesco retrospectiveanalysisofpegylatedliposomaldoxorubicininovariancancerdowestillneedit
AT tagliaferripierosandro retrospectiveanalysisofpegylatedliposomaldoxorubicininovariancancerdowestillneedit