Cargando…
Positive psychology interventions: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies
BACKGROUND: The use of positive psychological interventions may be considered as a complementary strategy in mental health promotion and treatment. The present article constitutes a meta-analytical study of the effectiveness of positive psychology interventions for the general public and for individ...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3599475/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23390882 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-119 |
_version_ | 1782262971671511040 |
---|---|
author | Bolier, Linda Haverman, Merel Westerhof, Gerben J Riper, Heleen Smit, Filip Bohlmeijer, Ernst |
author_facet | Bolier, Linda Haverman, Merel Westerhof, Gerben J Riper, Heleen Smit, Filip Bohlmeijer, Ernst |
author_sort | Bolier, Linda |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The use of positive psychological interventions may be considered as a complementary strategy in mental health promotion and treatment. The present article constitutes a meta-analytical study of the effectiveness of positive psychology interventions for the general public and for individuals with specific psychosocial problems. METHODS: We conducted a systematic literature search using PubMed, PsychInfo, the Cochrane register, and manual searches. Forty articles, describing 39 studies, totaling 6,139 participants, met the criteria for inclusion. The outcome measures used were subjective well-being, psychological well-being and depression. Positive psychology interventions included self-help interventions, group training and individual therapy. RESULTS: The standardized mean difference was 0.34 for subjective well-being, 0.20 for psychological well-being and 0.23 for depression indicating small effects for positive psychology interventions. At follow-up from three to six months, effect sizes are small, but still significant for subjective well-being and psychological well-being, indicating that effects are fairly sustainable. Heterogeneity was rather high, due to the wide diversity of the studies included. Several variables moderated the impact on depression: Interventions were more effective if they were of longer duration, if recruitment was conducted via referral or hospital, if interventions were delivered to people with certain psychosocial problems and on an individual basis, and if the study design was of low quality. Moreover, indications for publication bias were found, and the quality of the studies varied considerably. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this meta-analysis show that positive psychology interventions can be effective in the enhancement of subjective well-being and psychological well-being, as well as in helping to reduce depressive symptoms. Additional high-quality peer-reviewed studies in diverse (clinical) populations are needed to strengthen the evidence-base for positive psychology interventions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3599475 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35994752013-03-17 Positive psychology interventions: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies Bolier, Linda Haverman, Merel Westerhof, Gerben J Riper, Heleen Smit, Filip Bohlmeijer, Ernst BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: The use of positive psychological interventions may be considered as a complementary strategy in mental health promotion and treatment. The present article constitutes a meta-analytical study of the effectiveness of positive psychology interventions for the general public and for individuals with specific psychosocial problems. METHODS: We conducted a systematic literature search using PubMed, PsychInfo, the Cochrane register, and manual searches. Forty articles, describing 39 studies, totaling 6,139 participants, met the criteria for inclusion. The outcome measures used were subjective well-being, psychological well-being and depression. Positive psychology interventions included self-help interventions, group training and individual therapy. RESULTS: The standardized mean difference was 0.34 for subjective well-being, 0.20 for psychological well-being and 0.23 for depression indicating small effects for positive psychology interventions. At follow-up from three to six months, effect sizes are small, but still significant for subjective well-being and psychological well-being, indicating that effects are fairly sustainable. Heterogeneity was rather high, due to the wide diversity of the studies included. Several variables moderated the impact on depression: Interventions were more effective if they were of longer duration, if recruitment was conducted via referral or hospital, if interventions were delivered to people with certain psychosocial problems and on an individual basis, and if the study design was of low quality. Moreover, indications for publication bias were found, and the quality of the studies varied considerably. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this meta-analysis show that positive psychology interventions can be effective in the enhancement of subjective well-being and psychological well-being, as well as in helping to reduce depressive symptoms. Additional high-quality peer-reviewed studies in diverse (clinical) populations are needed to strengthen the evidence-base for positive psychology interventions. BioMed Central 2013-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC3599475/ /pubmed/23390882 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-119 Text en Copyright ©2013 Bolier et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Bolier, Linda Haverman, Merel Westerhof, Gerben J Riper, Heleen Smit, Filip Bohlmeijer, Ernst Positive psychology interventions: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies |
title | Positive psychology interventions: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies |
title_full | Positive psychology interventions: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies |
title_fullStr | Positive psychology interventions: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies |
title_full_unstemmed | Positive psychology interventions: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies |
title_short | Positive psychology interventions: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies |
title_sort | positive psychology interventions: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3599475/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23390882 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-119 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bolierlinda positivepsychologyinterventionsametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledstudies AT havermanmerel positivepsychologyinterventionsametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledstudies AT westerhofgerbenj positivepsychologyinterventionsametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledstudies AT riperheleen positivepsychologyinterventionsametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledstudies AT smitfilip positivepsychologyinterventionsametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledstudies AT bohlmeijerernst positivepsychologyinterventionsametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledstudies |