Cargando…

Phase 1 studies of the safety and immunogenicity of electroporated HER2/CEA DNA vaccine followed by adenoviral boost immunization in patients with solid tumors

BACKGROUND: DNA electroporation has been demonstrated in preclinical models to be a promising strategy to improve cancer immunity, especially when combined with other genetic vaccines in heterologous prime-boost protocols. We report the results of 2 multicenter phase 1 trials involving adult cancer...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Diaz, Claudia Marcela, Chiappori, Alberto, Aurisicchio, Luigi, Bagchi, Ansuman, Clark, Jason, Dubey, Sheri, Fridman, Arthur, Fabregas, Jesus C, Marshall, John, Scarselli, Elisa, La Monica, Nicola, Ciliberto, Gennaro, Montero, Alberto J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3599587/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23497415
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1479-5876-11-62
_version_ 1782262997287174144
author Diaz, Claudia Marcela
Chiappori, Alberto
Aurisicchio, Luigi
Bagchi, Ansuman
Clark, Jason
Dubey, Sheri
Fridman, Arthur
Fabregas, Jesus C
Marshall, John
Scarselli, Elisa
La Monica, Nicola
Ciliberto, Gennaro
Montero, Alberto J
author_facet Diaz, Claudia Marcela
Chiappori, Alberto
Aurisicchio, Luigi
Bagchi, Ansuman
Clark, Jason
Dubey, Sheri
Fridman, Arthur
Fabregas, Jesus C
Marshall, John
Scarselli, Elisa
La Monica, Nicola
Ciliberto, Gennaro
Montero, Alberto J
author_sort Diaz, Claudia Marcela
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: DNA electroporation has been demonstrated in preclinical models to be a promising strategy to improve cancer immunity, especially when combined with other genetic vaccines in heterologous prime-boost protocols. We report the results of 2 multicenter phase 1 trials involving adult cancer patients (n=33) with stage II-IV disease. METHODS: Patients were vaccinated with V930 alone, a DNA vaccine containing equal amounts of plasmids expressing the extracellular and trans-membrane domains of human HER2, and a plasmid expressing CEA fused to the B subunit of Escherichia coli heat labile toxin (Study 1), or a heterologous prime-boost vaccination approach with V930 followed by V932, a dicistronic adenovirus subtype-6 viral vector vaccine coding for the same antigens (Study 2). RESULTS: The use of the V930 vaccination with electroporation alone or in combination with V932 was well-tolerated without any serious adverse events. In both studies, the most common vaccine-related side effects were injection site reactions and arthralgias. No measurable cell-mediated immune response (CMI) to CEA or HER2 was detected in patients by ELISPOT; however, a significant increase of both cell-mediated immunity and antibody titer against the bacterial heat labile toxin were observed upon vaccination. CONCLUSION: V930 vaccination alone or in combination with V932 was well tolerated without any vaccine-related serious adverse effects, and was able to induce measurable immune responses against bacterial antigen. However, the prime-boost strategy did not appear to augment any detectable CMI responses against either CEA or HER2. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Study 1 – ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00250419; Study 2 – ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00647114.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3599587
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35995872013-03-17 Phase 1 studies of the safety and immunogenicity of electroporated HER2/CEA DNA vaccine followed by adenoviral boost immunization in patients with solid tumors Diaz, Claudia Marcela Chiappori, Alberto Aurisicchio, Luigi Bagchi, Ansuman Clark, Jason Dubey, Sheri Fridman, Arthur Fabregas, Jesus C Marshall, John Scarselli, Elisa La Monica, Nicola Ciliberto, Gennaro Montero, Alberto J J Transl Med Research BACKGROUND: DNA electroporation has been demonstrated in preclinical models to be a promising strategy to improve cancer immunity, especially when combined with other genetic vaccines in heterologous prime-boost protocols. We report the results of 2 multicenter phase 1 trials involving adult cancer patients (n=33) with stage II-IV disease. METHODS: Patients were vaccinated with V930 alone, a DNA vaccine containing equal amounts of plasmids expressing the extracellular and trans-membrane domains of human HER2, and a plasmid expressing CEA fused to the B subunit of Escherichia coli heat labile toxin (Study 1), or a heterologous prime-boost vaccination approach with V930 followed by V932, a dicistronic adenovirus subtype-6 viral vector vaccine coding for the same antigens (Study 2). RESULTS: The use of the V930 vaccination with electroporation alone or in combination with V932 was well-tolerated without any serious adverse events. In both studies, the most common vaccine-related side effects were injection site reactions and arthralgias. No measurable cell-mediated immune response (CMI) to CEA or HER2 was detected in patients by ELISPOT; however, a significant increase of both cell-mediated immunity and antibody titer against the bacterial heat labile toxin were observed upon vaccination. CONCLUSION: V930 vaccination alone or in combination with V932 was well tolerated without any vaccine-related serious adverse effects, and was able to induce measurable immune responses against bacterial antigen. However, the prime-boost strategy did not appear to augment any detectable CMI responses against either CEA or HER2. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Study 1 – ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00250419; Study 2 – ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00647114. BioMed Central 2013-03-08 /pmc/articles/PMC3599587/ /pubmed/23497415 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1479-5876-11-62 Text en Copyright © 2013 Diaz et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Diaz, Claudia Marcela
Chiappori, Alberto
Aurisicchio, Luigi
Bagchi, Ansuman
Clark, Jason
Dubey, Sheri
Fridman, Arthur
Fabregas, Jesus C
Marshall, John
Scarselli, Elisa
La Monica, Nicola
Ciliberto, Gennaro
Montero, Alberto J
Phase 1 studies of the safety and immunogenicity of electroporated HER2/CEA DNA vaccine followed by adenoviral boost immunization in patients with solid tumors
title Phase 1 studies of the safety and immunogenicity of electroporated HER2/CEA DNA vaccine followed by adenoviral boost immunization in patients with solid tumors
title_full Phase 1 studies of the safety and immunogenicity of electroporated HER2/CEA DNA vaccine followed by adenoviral boost immunization in patients with solid tumors
title_fullStr Phase 1 studies of the safety and immunogenicity of electroporated HER2/CEA DNA vaccine followed by adenoviral boost immunization in patients with solid tumors
title_full_unstemmed Phase 1 studies of the safety and immunogenicity of electroporated HER2/CEA DNA vaccine followed by adenoviral boost immunization in patients with solid tumors
title_short Phase 1 studies of the safety and immunogenicity of electroporated HER2/CEA DNA vaccine followed by adenoviral boost immunization in patients with solid tumors
title_sort phase 1 studies of the safety and immunogenicity of electroporated her2/cea dna vaccine followed by adenoviral boost immunization in patients with solid tumors
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3599587/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23497415
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1479-5876-11-62
work_keys_str_mv AT diazclaudiamarcela phase1studiesofthesafetyandimmunogenicityofelectroporatedher2ceadnavaccinefollowedbyadenoviralboostimmunizationinpatientswithsolidtumors
AT chiapporialberto phase1studiesofthesafetyandimmunogenicityofelectroporatedher2ceadnavaccinefollowedbyadenoviralboostimmunizationinpatientswithsolidtumors
AT aurisicchioluigi phase1studiesofthesafetyandimmunogenicityofelectroporatedher2ceadnavaccinefollowedbyadenoviralboostimmunizationinpatientswithsolidtumors
AT bagchiansuman phase1studiesofthesafetyandimmunogenicityofelectroporatedher2ceadnavaccinefollowedbyadenoviralboostimmunizationinpatientswithsolidtumors
AT clarkjason phase1studiesofthesafetyandimmunogenicityofelectroporatedher2ceadnavaccinefollowedbyadenoviralboostimmunizationinpatientswithsolidtumors
AT dubeysheri phase1studiesofthesafetyandimmunogenicityofelectroporatedher2ceadnavaccinefollowedbyadenoviralboostimmunizationinpatientswithsolidtumors
AT fridmanarthur phase1studiesofthesafetyandimmunogenicityofelectroporatedher2ceadnavaccinefollowedbyadenoviralboostimmunizationinpatientswithsolidtumors
AT fabregasjesusc phase1studiesofthesafetyandimmunogenicityofelectroporatedher2ceadnavaccinefollowedbyadenoviralboostimmunizationinpatientswithsolidtumors
AT marshalljohn phase1studiesofthesafetyandimmunogenicityofelectroporatedher2ceadnavaccinefollowedbyadenoviralboostimmunizationinpatientswithsolidtumors
AT scarsellielisa phase1studiesofthesafetyandimmunogenicityofelectroporatedher2ceadnavaccinefollowedbyadenoviralboostimmunizationinpatientswithsolidtumors
AT lamonicanicola phase1studiesofthesafetyandimmunogenicityofelectroporatedher2ceadnavaccinefollowedbyadenoviralboostimmunizationinpatientswithsolidtumors
AT cilibertogennaro phase1studiesofthesafetyandimmunogenicityofelectroporatedher2ceadnavaccinefollowedbyadenoviralboostimmunizationinpatientswithsolidtumors
AT monteroalbertoj phase1studiesofthesafetyandimmunogenicityofelectroporatedher2ceadnavaccinefollowedbyadenoviralboostimmunizationinpatientswithsolidtumors