Cargando…

Effectiveness of late gadolinium enhancement to improve outcomes prediction in patients referred for cardiovascular magnetic resonance after echocardiography

BACKGROUND: Echocardiography (echo) is a first line test to assess cardiac structure and function. It is not known if cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) with late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) ordered during routine clinical practice in selected patients can add additional prognostic information...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wong, Timothy C, Piehler, Kayla, Puntil, Kathy S, Moguillansky, Diego, Meier, Christopher G, Lacomis, Joan M, Kellman, Peter, Cook, Stephen C, Schwartzman, David S, Simon, Marc A, Mulukutla, Suresh R, Schelbert, Erik B
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3599652/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23324403
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-15-6
_version_ 1782263012118233088
author Wong, Timothy C
Piehler, Kayla
Puntil, Kathy S
Moguillansky, Diego
Meier, Christopher G
Lacomis, Joan M
Kellman, Peter
Cook, Stephen C
Schwartzman, David S
Simon, Marc A
Mulukutla, Suresh R
Schelbert, Erik B
author_facet Wong, Timothy C
Piehler, Kayla
Puntil, Kathy S
Moguillansky, Diego
Meier, Christopher G
Lacomis, Joan M
Kellman, Peter
Cook, Stephen C
Schwartzman, David S
Simon, Marc A
Mulukutla, Suresh R
Schelbert, Erik B
author_sort Wong, Timothy C
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Echocardiography (echo) is a first line test to assess cardiac structure and function. It is not known if cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) with late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) ordered during routine clinical practice in selected patients can add additional prognostic information after routine echo. We assessed whether CMR improves outcomes prediction after contemporaneous echo, which may have implications for efforts to optimize processes of care, assess effectiveness, and allocate limited health care resources. METHODS AND RESULTS: We prospectively enrolled 1044 consecutive patients referred for CMR. There were 38 deaths and 3 cardiac transplants over a median follow-up of 1.0 years (IQR 0.4-1.5). We first reproduced previous survival curve strata (presence of LGE and ejection fraction (EF) < 50%) for transplant free survival, to support generalizability of any findings. Then, in a subset (n = 444) with contemporaneous echo (median 3 days apart, IQR 1–9), EF by echo (assessed visually) or CMR were modestly correlated (R(2) = 0.66, p < 0.001), and 30 deaths and 3 transplants occurred over a median follow-up of 0.83 years (IQR 0.29-1.40). CMR EF predicted mortality better than echo EF in univariable Cox models (Integrated Discrimination Improvement (IDI) 0.018, 95% CI 0.008-0.034; Net Reclassification Improvement (NRI) 0.51, 95% CI 0.11-0.85). Finally, LGE further improved prediction beyond EF as determined by hazard ratios, NRI, and IDI in all Cox models predicting mortality or transplant free survival, adjusting for age, gender, wall motion, and EF. CONCLUSIONS: Among those referred for CMR after echocardiography, CMR with LGE further improves risk stratification of individuals at risk for death or death/cardiac transplant.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3599652
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35996522013-03-23 Effectiveness of late gadolinium enhancement to improve outcomes prediction in patients referred for cardiovascular magnetic resonance after echocardiography Wong, Timothy C Piehler, Kayla Puntil, Kathy S Moguillansky, Diego Meier, Christopher G Lacomis, Joan M Kellman, Peter Cook, Stephen C Schwartzman, David S Simon, Marc A Mulukutla, Suresh R Schelbert, Erik B J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Research BACKGROUND: Echocardiography (echo) is a first line test to assess cardiac structure and function. It is not known if cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) with late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) ordered during routine clinical practice in selected patients can add additional prognostic information after routine echo. We assessed whether CMR improves outcomes prediction after contemporaneous echo, which may have implications for efforts to optimize processes of care, assess effectiveness, and allocate limited health care resources. METHODS AND RESULTS: We prospectively enrolled 1044 consecutive patients referred for CMR. There were 38 deaths and 3 cardiac transplants over a median follow-up of 1.0 years (IQR 0.4-1.5). We first reproduced previous survival curve strata (presence of LGE and ejection fraction (EF) < 50%) for transplant free survival, to support generalizability of any findings. Then, in a subset (n = 444) with contemporaneous echo (median 3 days apart, IQR 1–9), EF by echo (assessed visually) or CMR were modestly correlated (R(2) = 0.66, p < 0.001), and 30 deaths and 3 transplants occurred over a median follow-up of 0.83 years (IQR 0.29-1.40). CMR EF predicted mortality better than echo EF in univariable Cox models (Integrated Discrimination Improvement (IDI) 0.018, 95% CI 0.008-0.034; Net Reclassification Improvement (NRI) 0.51, 95% CI 0.11-0.85). Finally, LGE further improved prediction beyond EF as determined by hazard ratios, NRI, and IDI in all Cox models predicting mortality or transplant free survival, adjusting for age, gender, wall motion, and EF. CONCLUSIONS: Among those referred for CMR after echocardiography, CMR with LGE further improves risk stratification of individuals at risk for death or death/cardiac transplant. BioMed Central 2013-01-16 /pmc/articles/PMC3599652/ /pubmed/23324403 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-15-6 Text en Copyright ©2013 Wong et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Wong, Timothy C
Piehler, Kayla
Puntil, Kathy S
Moguillansky, Diego
Meier, Christopher G
Lacomis, Joan M
Kellman, Peter
Cook, Stephen C
Schwartzman, David S
Simon, Marc A
Mulukutla, Suresh R
Schelbert, Erik B
Effectiveness of late gadolinium enhancement to improve outcomes prediction in patients referred for cardiovascular magnetic resonance after echocardiography
title Effectiveness of late gadolinium enhancement to improve outcomes prediction in patients referred for cardiovascular magnetic resonance after echocardiography
title_full Effectiveness of late gadolinium enhancement to improve outcomes prediction in patients referred for cardiovascular magnetic resonance after echocardiography
title_fullStr Effectiveness of late gadolinium enhancement to improve outcomes prediction in patients referred for cardiovascular magnetic resonance after echocardiography
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of late gadolinium enhancement to improve outcomes prediction in patients referred for cardiovascular magnetic resonance after echocardiography
title_short Effectiveness of late gadolinium enhancement to improve outcomes prediction in patients referred for cardiovascular magnetic resonance after echocardiography
title_sort effectiveness of late gadolinium enhancement to improve outcomes prediction in patients referred for cardiovascular magnetic resonance after echocardiography
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3599652/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23324403
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-15-6
work_keys_str_mv AT wongtimothyc effectivenessoflategadoliniumenhancementtoimproveoutcomespredictioninpatientsreferredforcardiovascularmagneticresonanceafterechocardiography
AT piehlerkayla effectivenessoflategadoliniumenhancementtoimproveoutcomespredictioninpatientsreferredforcardiovascularmagneticresonanceafterechocardiography
AT puntilkathys effectivenessoflategadoliniumenhancementtoimproveoutcomespredictioninpatientsreferredforcardiovascularmagneticresonanceafterechocardiography
AT moguillanskydiego effectivenessoflategadoliniumenhancementtoimproveoutcomespredictioninpatientsreferredforcardiovascularmagneticresonanceafterechocardiography
AT meierchristopherg effectivenessoflategadoliniumenhancementtoimproveoutcomespredictioninpatientsreferredforcardiovascularmagneticresonanceafterechocardiography
AT lacomisjoanm effectivenessoflategadoliniumenhancementtoimproveoutcomespredictioninpatientsreferredforcardiovascularmagneticresonanceafterechocardiography
AT kellmanpeter effectivenessoflategadoliniumenhancementtoimproveoutcomespredictioninpatientsreferredforcardiovascularmagneticresonanceafterechocardiography
AT cookstephenc effectivenessoflategadoliniumenhancementtoimproveoutcomespredictioninpatientsreferredforcardiovascularmagneticresonanceafterechocardiography
AT schwartzmandavids effectivenessoflategadoliniumenhancementtoimproveoutcomespredictioninpatientsreferredforcardiovascularmagneticresonanceafterechocardiography
AT simonmarca effectivenessoflategadoliniumenhancementtoimproveoutcomespredictioninpatientsreferredforcardiovascularmagneticresonanceafterechocardiography
AT mulukutlasureshr effectivenessoflategadoliniumenhancementtoimproveoutcomespredictioninpatientsreferredforcardiovascularmagneticresonanceafterechocardiography
AT schelberterikb effectivenessoflategadoliniumenhancementtoimproveoutcomespredictioninpatientsreferredforcardiovascularmagneticresonanceafterechocardiography