Cargando…

Safe digital isolation of the santorini plexus during radical retropubic prostatectomy

BACKGROUND: We describe a safe and easily reproducible technique to control Santorini plexus during radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) which uses simple digital dissection. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 56 consecutive patients who underwent RRP for clinically localised prostate cancer fro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cristini, Cristiano, Pierro, Giovanni Battista Di, Leonardo, Costantino, Nunzio, Cosimo De, Franco, Giorgio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3599675/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23445607
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2490-13-13
_version_ 1782263019434147840
author Cristini, Cristiano
Pierro, Giovanni Battista Di
Leonardo, Costantino
Nunzio, Cosimo De
Franco, Giorgio
author_facet Cristini, Cristiano
Pierro, Giovanni Battista Di
Leonardo, Costantino
Nunzio, Cosimo De
Franco, Giorgio
author_sort Cristini, Cristiano
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: We describe a safe and easily reproducible technique to control Santorini plexus during radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) which uses simple digital dissection. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 56 consecutive patients who underwent RRP for clinically localised prostate cancer from November 2008 to November 2010. Santorini plexus was isolated and secured in all patients using a new technique of simple digital dissection in which the index finger is used not to only localize the catheter inside the urethra, but also to develop the right plane between Santorini plexus and urethra. This is obtained by gentle bilateral digital dissection through the lateral aspects of periprostatic fascia which are eventually breached by the fingers, developing a right plane just above the urethra. Santorini plexus is then easily ligated and divided. Indicators of outcomes included estimated blood loss, transfusion requirements, operative time, positive margins and complication rates of the technique. RESULTS: The maneuver was successful in 53/56 (95%) patients. Mean (range) blood loss and overall operative time for RRP were 620 ml (100–1500) and 130 min. (80–190), respectively. Transfusion rate was 8,9% (5/56). Positive surgical margin rate was 14% (8/56). No complication related to the employed technique was recorded. CONCLUSIONS: Digital dissection of Santorini plexus during RRP is simple and easily feasible. It speeds up the process of finding the right plane just above the urethra allowing good haemostasis in the surgical field and proper apical dissection.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3599675
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35996752013-03-17 Safe digital isolation of the santorini plexus during radical retropubic prostatectomy Cristini, Cristiano Pierro, Giovanni Battista Di Leonardo, Costantino Nunzio, Cosimo De Franco, Giorgio BMC Urol Technical Advance BACKGROUND: We describe a safe and easily reproducible technique to control Santorini plexus during radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) which uses simple digital dissection. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 56 consecutive patients who underwent RRP for clinically localised prostate cancer from November 2008 to November 2010. Santorini plexus was isolated and secured in all patients using a new technique of simple digital dissection in which the index finger is used not to only localize the catheter inside the urethra, but also to develop the right plane between Santorini plexus and urethra. This is obtained by gentle bilateral digital dissection through the lateral aspects of periprostatic fascia which are eventually breached by the fingers, developing a right plane just above the urethra. Santorini plexus is then easily ligated and divided. Indicators of outcomes included estimated blood loss, transfusion requirements, operative time, positive margins and complication rates of the technique. RESULTS: The maneuver was successful in 53/56 (95%) patients. Mean (range) blood loss and overall operative time for RRP were 620 ml (100–1500) and 130 min. (80–190), respectively. Transfusion rate was 8,9% (5/56). Positive surgical margin rate was 14% (8/56). No complication related to the employed technique was recorded. CONCLUSIONS: Digital dissection of Santorini plexus during RRP is simple and easily feasible. It speeds up the process of finding the right plane just above the urethra allowing good haemostasis in the surgical field and proper apical dissection. BioMed Central 2013-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC3599675/ /pubmed/23445607 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2490-13-13 Text en Copyright ©2013 Cristini et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Technical Advance
Cristini, Cristiano
Pierro, Giovanni Battista Di
Leonardo, Costantino
Nunzio, Cosimo De
Franco, Giorgio
Safe digital isolation of the santorini plexus during radical retropubic prostatectomy
title Safe digital isolation of the santorini plexus during radical retropubic prostatectomy
title_full Safe digital isolation of the santorini plexus during radical retropubic prostatectomy
title_fullStr Safe digital isolation of the santorini plexus during radical retropubic prostatectomy
title_full_unstemmed Safe digital isolation of the santorini plexus during radical retropubic prostatectomy
title_short Safe digital isolation of the santorini plexus during radical retropubic prostatectomy
title_sort safe digital isolation of the santorini plexus during radical retropubic prostatectomy
topic Technical Advance
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3599675/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23445607
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2490-13-13
work_keys_str_mv AT cristinicristiano safedigitalisolationofthesantoriniplexusduringradicalretropubicprostatectomy
AT pierrogiovannibattistadi safedigitalisolationofthesantoriniplexusduringradicalretropubicprostatectomy
AT leonardocostantino safedigitalisolationofthesantoriniplexusduringradicalretropubicprostatectomy
AT nunziocosimode safedigitalisolationofthesantoriniplexusduringradicalretropubicprostatectomy
AT francogiorgio safedigitalisolationofthesantoriniplexusduringradicalretropubicprostatectomy