Cargando…

Development and validation of a pregnancy symptoms inventory

BACKGROUND: Physical symptoms are common in pregnancy and are predominantly associated with normal physiological changes. These symptoms have a social and economic cost, leading to absenteeism from work and additional medical interventions. There is currently no simple method for identifying common...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Foxcroft, Katie F, Callaway, Leonie K, Byrne, Nuala M, Webster, Joan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3599678/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23324494
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-13-3
_version_ 1782263020789956608
author Foxcroft, Katie F
Callaway, Leonie K
Byrne, Nuala M
Webster, Joan
author_facet Foxcroft, Katie F
Callaway, Leonie K
Byrne, Nuala M
Webster, Joan
author_sort Foxcroft, Katie F
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Physical symptoms are common in pregnancy and are predominantly associated with normal physiological changes. These symptoms have a social and economic cost, leading to absenteeism from work and additional medical interventions. There is currently no simple method for identifying common pregnancy related problems in the antenatal period. A validated tool, for use by pregnancy care providers would be useful. The aim of this study was to develop and validate a Pregnancy Symptoms Inventory for use by health professionals. METHODS: A list of symptoms was generated via expert consultation with health professionals. Focus groups were conducted with pregnant women. The inventory was tested for face validity and piloted for readability and comprehension. For test-re-test reliability, the tool was administered to the same women 2 to 3 days apart. Finally, midwives trialled the inventory for 1 month and rated its usefulness on a 10cm visual analogue scale (VAS). RESULTS: A 41-item Likert inventory assessing how often symptoms occurred and what effect they had, was developed. Individual item test re-test reliability was between .51 to 1, the majority (34 items) scoring ≥0.70. The top four “often” reported symptoms were urinary frequency (52.2%), tiredness (45.5%), poor sleep (27.5%) and back pain (19.5%). Among the women surveyed, 16.2% claimed to sometimes or often be incontinent. Referrals to the incontinence nurse increased > 8 fold during the study period. CONCLUSIONS: The PSI provides a comprehensive inventory of pregnancy related symptoms, with a mechanism for assessing their effect on function. It was robustly developed, with good test re-test reliability, face validity, comprehension and readability. This provides a validated tool for assessing the impact of interventions in pregnancy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3599678
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35996782013-03-17 Development and validation of a pregnancy symptoms inventory Foxcroft, Katie F Callaway, Leonie K Byrne, Nuala M Webster, Joan BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: Physical symptoms are common in pregnancy and are predominantly associated with normal physiological changes. These symptoms have a social and economic cost, leading to absenteeism from work and additional medical interventions. There is currently no simple method for identifying common pregnancy related problems in the antenatal period. A validated tool, for use by pregnancy care providers would be useful. The aim of this study was to develop and validate a Pregnancy Symptoms Inventory for use by health professionals. METHODS: A list of symptoms was generated via expert consultation with health professionals. Focus groups were conducted with pregnant women. The inventory was tested for face validity and piloted for readability and comprehension. For test-re-test reliability, the tool was administered to the same women 2 to 3 days apart. Finally, midwives trialled the inventory for 1 month and rated its usefulness on a 10cm visual analogue scale (VAS). RESULTS: A 41-item Likert inventory assessing how often symptoms occurred and what effect they had, was developed. Individual item test re-test reliability was between .51 to 1, the majority (34 items) scoring ≥0.70. The top four “often” reported symptoms were urinary frequency (52.2%), tiredness (45.5%), poor sleep (27.5%) and back pain (19.5%). Among the women surveyed, 16.2% claimed to sometimes or often be incontinent. Referrals to the incontinence nurse increased > 8 fold during the study period. CONCLUSIONS: The PSI provides a comprehensive inventory of pregnancy related symptoms, with a mechanism for assessing their effect on function. It was robustly developed, with good test re-test reliability, face validity, comprehension and readability. This provides a validated tool for assessing the impact of interventions in pregnancy. BioMed Central 2013-01-16 /pmc/articles/PMC3599678/ /pubmed/23324494 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-13-3 Text en Copyright ©2013 Foxcroft et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Foxcroft, Katie F
Callaway, Leonie K
Byrne, Nuala M
Webster, Joan
Development and validation of a pregnancy symptoms inventory
title Development and validation of a pregnancy symptoms inventory
title_full Development and validation of a pregnancy symptoms inventory
title_fullStr Development and validation of a pregnancy symptoms inventory
title_full_unstemmed Development and validation of a pregnancy symptoms inventory
title_short Development and validation of a pregnancy symptoms inventory
title_sort development and validation of a pregnancy symptoms inventory
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3599678/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23324494
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-13-3
work_keys_str_mv AT foxcroftkatief developmentandvalidationofapregnancysymptomsinventory
AT callawayleoniek developmentandvalidationofapregnancysymptomsinventory
AT byrnenualam developmentandvalidationofapregnancysymptomsinventory
AT websterjoan developmentandvalidationofapregnancysymptomsinventory