Cargando…

Incidence of and risk factors for perineal trauma: a prospective observational study

BACKGROUND: Our aim was to describe the range of perineal trauma in women with a singleton vaginal birth and estimate the effect of maternal and obstetric characteristics on the incidence of perineal tears. METHODS: We conducted a prospective observational study on all women with a planned singleton...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Smith, Lesley A, Price, Natalia, Simonite, Vanessa, Burns, Ethel E
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3599825/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23497085
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-13-59
_version_ 1782475538782224384
author Smith, Lesley A
Price, Natalia
Simonite, Vanessa
Burns, Ethel E
author_facet Smith, Lesley A
Price, Natalia
Simonite, Vanessa
Burns, Ethel E
author_sort Smith, Lesley A
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Our aim was to describe the range of perineal trauma in women with a singleton vaginal birth and estimate the effect of maternal and obstetric characteristics on the incidence of perineal tears. METHODS: We conducted a prospective observational study on all women with a planned singleton vaginal delivery between May and September 2006 in one obstetric unit, three freestanding midwifery-led units and home settings in South East England. Data on maternal and obstetric characteristics were collected prospectively and analysed using univariable and multivariable logistic regression. The outcome measures were incidence of perineal trauma, type of perineal trauma and whether it was sutured or not. RESULTS: The proportion of women with an intact perineum at delivery was 9.6% (125/1,302) in nulliparae, and 31.2% (453/1,452) in multiparae, with a higher incidence in the community (freestanding midwifery-led units and home settings). Multivariable analysis showed multiparity (OR 0.52; 95% CI: 0.30–0.90) was associated with reduced odds of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS), whilst forceps (OR 4.43; 95% CI: 2.02–9.71), longer duration of second stage of labour (OR 1.49; 95% CI: 1.13–1.98), and heavier birthweight (OR 1.001; 95% CI: 1.001–1.001), were associated with increased odds. Adjusted ORs for spontaneous perineal truama were: multiparity (OR 0.42; 95% CI: 0.32–0.56); hospital delivery (OR 1.48; 95% CI: 1.01–2.17); forceps delivery (OR 2.61; 95% CI: 1.22–5.56); longer duration of second stage labour (OR 1.45; 95% CI: 1.28–1.63); and heavier birthweight (OR 1.001; 95% CI: 1.000–1.001). CONCLUSIONS: This large prospective study found no evidence for an association between many factors related to midwifery practice such as use of a birthing pool, digital perineal stretching in the second stage, hands off delivery technique, or maternal birth position with incidence of OASIS or spontaneous perineal trauma. We also found a low overall incidence of OASIS, and fewer second degree tears were sutured in the community than in the hospital settings. This study confirms previous findings of overall high incidence of perineal trauma following vaginal delivery, and a strong association between forceps delivery and perineal trauma.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3599825
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35998252013-03-17 Incidence of and risk factors for perineal trauma: a prospective observational study Smith, Lesley A Price, Natalia Simonite, Vanessa Burns, Ethel E BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: Our aim was to describe the range of perineal trauma in women with a singleton vaginal birth and estimate the effect of maternal and obstetric characteristics on the incidence of perineal tears. METHODS: We conducted a prospective observational study on all women with a planned singleton vaginal delivery between May and September 2006 in one obstetric unit, three freestanding midwifery-led units and home settings in South East England. Data on maternal and obstetric characteristics were collected prospectively and analysed using univariable and multivariable logistic regression. The outcome measures were incidence of perineal trauma, type of perineal trauma and whether it was sutured or not. RESULTS: The proportion of women with an intact perineum at delivery was 9.6% (125/1,302) in nulliparae, and 31.2% (453/1,452) in multiparae, with a higher incidence in the community (freestanding midwifery-led units and home settings). Multivariable analysis showed multiparity (OR 0.52; 95% CI: 0.30–0.90) was associated with reduced odds of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS), whilst forceps (OR 4.43; 95% CI: 2.02–9.71), longer duration of second stage of labour (OR 1.49; 95% CI: 1.13–1.98), and heavier birthweight (OR 1.001; 95% CI: 1.001–1.001), were associated with increased odds. Adjusted ORs for spontaneous perineal truama were: multiparity (OR 0.42; 95% CI: 0.32–0.56); hospital delivery (OR 1.48; 95% CI: 1.01–2.17); forceps delivery (OR 2.61; 95% CI: 1.22–5.56); longer duration of second stage labour (OR 1.45; 95% CI: 1.28–1.63); and heavier birthweight (OR 1.001; 95% CI: 1.000–1.001). CONCLUSIONS: This large prospective study found no evidence for an association between many factors related to midwifery practice such as use of a birthing pool, digital perineal stretching in the second stage, hands off delivery technique, or maternal birth position with incidence of OASIS or spontaneous perineal trauma. We also found a low overall incidence of OASIS, and fewer second degree tears were sutured in the community than in the hospital settings. This study confirms previous findings of overall high incidence of perineal trauma following vaginal delivery, and a strong association between forceps delivery and perineal trauma. BioMed Central 2013-03-07 /pmc/articles/PMC3599825/ /pubmed/23497085 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-13-59 Text en Copyright ©2013 Smith et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Smith, Lesley A
Price, Natalia
Simonite, Vanessa
Burns, Ethel E
Incidence of and risk factors for perineal trauma: a prospective observational study
title Incidence of and risk factors for perineal trauma: a prospective observational study
title_full Incidence of and risk factors for perineal trauma: a prospective observational study
title_fullStr Incidence of and risk factors for perineal trauma: a prospective observational study
title_full_unstemmed Incidence of and risk factors for perineal trauma: a prospective observational study
title_short Incidence of and risk factors for perineal trauma: a prospective observational study
title_sort incidence of and risk factors for perineal trauma: a prospective observational study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3599825/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23497085
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-13-59
work_keys_str_mv AT smithlesleya incidenceofandriskfactorsforperinealtraumaaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT pricenatalia incidenceofandriskfactorsforperinealtraumaaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT simonitevanessa incidenceofandriskfactorsforperinealtraumaaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT burnsethele incidenceofandriskfactorsforperinealtraumaaprospectiveobservationalstudy