Cargando…
A phase II, sham-controlled, double-blinded study testing the safety and efficacy of the coronary sinus reducer in patients with refractory angina: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
BACKGROUND: A growing population of patients lives with severe coronary artery disease not amenable to coronary revascularization and with refractory angina despite optimal medical therapy. Percutaneous reduction of the coronary sinus is an emerging treatment for myocardial ischemia that increases c...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3599995/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23413981 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-14-46 |
_version_ | 1782475576598069248 |
---|---|
author | Jolicœur, E Marc Banai, Shmuel Henry, Timothy D Schwartz, Marc Doucet, Serge White, Christopher J Edelman, Elazer Verheye, Stefan |
author_facet | Jolicœur, E Marc Banai, Shmuel Henry, Timothy D Schwartz, Marc Doucet, Serge White, Christopher J Edelman, Elazer Verheye, Stefan |
author_sort | Jolicœur, E Marc |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: A growing population of patients lives with severe coronary artery disease not amenable to coronary revascularization and with refractory angina despite optimal medical therapy. Percutaneous reduction of the coronary sinus is an emerging treatment for myocardial ischemia that increases coronary sinus pressure to promote a transcollateral redistribution of coronary artery in-flow from nonischemic to ischemic subendocardial territories. A first-in-man study has demonstrated that the percutaneous reduction of the coronary sinus can be performed safely in such patients. The COSIRA trial seeks to assess whether a percutaneous reduction of the coronary sinus can improve the symptoms of refractory angina in patients with limited revascularization options. METHODS/DESIGN: The COSIRA trial is a phase II double-blind, sham-controlled, randomized parallel trial comparing the percutaneously implanted coronary sinus Reducer (Neovasc Inc, Richmond, BC, Canada) to a sham implantation in 124 patients enrolled in Canada, Belgium, England, Scotland, Sweden and Denmark. All patients need to have stable Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) class III or IV angina despite optimal medical therapy, with evidence of reversible ischemia related to disease in the left coronary artery, and a left ventricular ejection fraction >25%. Participants experiencing an improvement in their angina ≥2 CCS classes six months after the randomization will meet the primary efficacy endpoint. The secondary objective of this trial is to test whether coronary sinus Reducer implantation will improve left ventricular ischemia, as measured by the improvement in dobutamine echocardiogram wall motion score index and in time to 1 mm ST-segment depression from baseline to six-month post-implantation. DISCUSSION: Based on previous observations, the COSIRA is expected to provide a significant positive result or an informative null result upon which rational development decisions can be based. Patient safety is a central concern and extensive monitoring should allow an appropriate investigation of the safety related to the coronary sinus Reducer. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier - NCT01205893. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3599995 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35999952013-03-17 A phase II, sham-controlled, double-blinded study testing the safety and efficacy of the coronary sinus reducer in patients with refractory angina: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial Jolicœur, E Marc Banai, Shmuel Henry, Timothy D Schwartz, Marc Doucet, Serge White, Christopher J Edelman, Elazer Verheye, Stefan Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: A growing population of patients lives with severe coronary artery disease not amenable to coronary revascularization and with refractory angina despite optimal medical therapy. Percutaneous reduction of the coronary sinus is an emerging treatment for myocardial ischemia that increases coronary sinus pressure to promote a transcollateral redistribution of coronary artery in-flow from nonischemic to ischemic subendocardial territories. A first-in-man study has demonstrated that the percutaneous reduction of the coronary sinus can be performed safely in such patients. The COSIRA trial seeks to assess whether a percutaneous reduction of the coronary sinus can improve the symptoms of refractory angina in patients with limited revascularization options. METHODS/DESIGN: The COSIRA trial is a phase II double-blind, sham-controlled, randomized parallel trial comparing the percutaneously implanted coronary sinus Reducer (Neovasc Inc, Richmond, BC, Canada) to a sham implantation in 124 patients enrolled in Canada, Belgium, England, Scotland, Sweden and Denmark. All patients need to have stable Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) class III or IV angina despite optimal medical therapy, with evidence of reversible ischemia related to disease in the left coronary artery, and a left ventricular ejection fraction >25%. Participants experiencing an improvement in their angina ≥2 CCS classes six months after the randomization will meet the primary efficacy endpoint. The secondary objective of this trial is to test whether coronary sinus Reducer implantation will improve left ventricular ischemia, as measured by the improvement in dobutamine echocardiogram wall motion score index and in time to 1 mm ST-segment depression from baseline to six-month post-implantation. DISCUSSION: Based on previous observations, the COSIRA is expected to provide a significant positive result or an informative null result upon which rational development decisions can be based. Patient safety is a central concern and extensive monitoring should allow an appropriate investigation of the safety related to the coronary sinus Reducer. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier - NCT01205893. BioMed Central 2013-02-15 /pmc/articles/PMC3599995/ /pubmed/23413981 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-14-46 Text en Copyright ©2013 Jolicoeur et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Jolicœur, E Marc Banai, Shmuel Henry, Timothy D Schwartz, Marc Doucet, Serge White, Christopher J Edelman, Elazer Verheye, Stefan A phase II, sham-controlled, double-blinded study testing the safety and efficacy of the coronary sinus reducer in patients with refractory angina: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title | A phase II, sham-controlled, double-blinded study testing the safety and efficacy of the coronary sinus reducer in patients with refractory angina: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_full | A phase II, sham-controlled, double-blinded study testing the safety and efficacy of the coronary sinus reducer in patients with refractory angina: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | A phase II, sham-controlled, double-blinded study testing the safety and efficacy of the coronary sinus reducer in patients with refractory angina: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | A phase II, sham-controlled, double-blinded study testing the safety and efficacy of the coronary sinus reducer in patients with refractory angina: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_short | A phase II, sham-controlled, double-blinded study testing the safety and efficacy of the coronary sinus reducer in patients with refractory angina: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | phase ii, sham-controlled, double-blinded study testing the safety and efficacy of the coronary sinus reducer in patients with refractory angina: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3599995/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23413981 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-14-46 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jolicœuremarc aphaseiishamcontrolleddoubleblindedstudytestingthesafetyandefficacyofthecoronarysinusreducerinpatientswithrefractoryanginastudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT banaishmuel aphaseiishamcontrolleddoubleblindedstudytestingthesafetyandefficacyofthecoronarysinusreducerinpatientswithrefractoryanginastudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT henrytimothyd aphaseiishamcontrolleddoubleblindedstudytestingthesafetyandefficacyofthecoronarysinusreducerinpatientswithrefractoryanginastudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT schwartzmarc aphaseiishamcontrolleddoubleblindedstudytestingthesafetyandefficacyofthecoronarysinusreducerinpatientswithrefractoryanginastudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT doucetserge aphaseiishamcontrolleddoubleblindedstudytestingthesafetyandefficacyofthecoronarysinusreducerinpatientswithrefractoryanginastudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT whitechristopherj aphaseiishamcontrolleddoubleblindedstudytestingthesafetyandefficacyofthecoronarysinusreducerinpatientswithrefractoryanginastudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT edelmanelazer aphaseiishamcontrolleddoubleblindedstudytestingthesafetyandefficacyofthecoronarysinusreducerinpatientswithrefractoryanginastudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT verheyestefan aphaseiishamcontrolleddoubleblindedstudytestingthesafetyandefficacyofthecoronarysinusreducerinpatientswithrefractoryanginastudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT jolicœuremarc phaseiishamcontrolleddoubleblindedstudytestingthesafetyandefficacyofthecoronarysinusreducerinpatientswithrefractoryanginastudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT banaishmuel phaseiishamcontrolleddoubleblindedstudytestingthesafetyandefficacyofthecoronarysinusreducerinpatientswithrefractoryanginastudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT henrytimothyd phaseiishamcontrolleddoubleblindedstudytestingthesafetyandefficacyofthecoronarysinusreducerinpatientswithrefractoryanginastudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT schwartzmarc phaseiishamcontrolleddoubleblindedstudytestingthesafetyandefficacyofthecoronarysinusreducerinpatientswithrefractoryanginastudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT doucetserge phaseiishamcontrolleddoubleblindedstudytestingthesafetyandefficacyofthecoronarysinusreducerinpatientswithrefractoryanginastudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT whitechristopherj phaseiishamcontrolleddoubleblindedstudytestingthesafetyandefficacyofthecoronarysinusreducerinpatientswithrefractoryanginastudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT edelmanelazer phaseiishamcontrolleddoubleblindedstudytestingthesafetyandefficacyofthecoronarysinusreducerinpatientswithrefractoryanginastudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT verheyestefan phaseiishamcontrolleddoubleblindedstudytestingthesafetyandefficacyofthecoronarysinusreducerinpatientswithrefractoryanginastudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial |