Cargando…

A phase II, sham-controlled, double-blinded study testing the safety and efficacy of the coronary sinus reducer in patients with refractory angina: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: A growing population of patients lives with severe coronary artery disease not amenable to coronary revascularization and with refractory angina despite optimal medical therapy. Percutaneous reduction of the coronary sinus is an emerging treatment for myocardial ischemia that increases c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jolicœur, E Marc, Banai, Shmuel, Henry, Timothy D, Schwartz, Marc, Doucet, Serge, White, Christopher J, Edelman, Elazer, Verheye, Stefan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3599995/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23413981
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-14-46
_version_ 1782475576598069248
author Jolicœur, E Marc
Banai, Shmuel
Henry, Timothy D
Schwartz, Marc
Doucet, Serge
White, Christopher J
Edelman, Elazer
Verheye, Stefan
author_facet Jolicœur, E Marc
Banai, Shmuel
Henry, Timothy D
Schwartz, Marc
Doucet, Serge
White, Christopher J
Edelman, Elazer
Verheye, Stefan
author_sort Jolicœur, E Marc
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A growing population of patients lives with severe coronary artery disease not amenable to coronary revascularization and with refractory angina despite optimal medical therapy. Percutaneous reduction of the coronary sinus is an emerging treatment for myocardial ischemia that increases coronary sinus pressure to promote a transcollateral redistribution of coronary artery in-flow from nonischemic to ischemic subendocardial territories. A first-in-man study has demonstrated that the percutaneous reduction of the coronary sinus can be performed safely in such patients. The COSIRA trial seeks to assess whether a percutaneous reduction of the coronary sinus can improve the symptoms of refractory angina in patients with limited revascularization options. METHODS/DESIGN: The COSIRA trial is a phase II double-blind, sham-controlled, randomized parallel trial comparing the percutaneously implanted coronary sinus Reducer (Neovasc Inc, Richmond, BC, Canada) to a sham implantation in 124 patients enrolled in Canada, Belgium, England, Scotland, Sweden and Denmark. All patients need to have stable Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) class III or IV angina despite optimal medical therapy, with evidence of reversible ischemia related to disease in the left coronary artery, and a left ventricular ejection fraction >25%. Participants experiencing an improvement in their angina ≥2 CCS classes six months after the randomization will meet the primary efficacy endpoint. The secondary objective of this trial is to test whether coronary sinus Reducer implantation will improve left ventricular ischemia, as measured by the improvement in dobutamine echocardiogram wall motion score index and in time to 1 mm ST-segment depression from baseline to six-month post-implantation. DISCUSSION: Based on previous observations, the COSIRA is expected to provide a significant positive result or an informative null result upon which rational development decisions can be based. Patient safety is a central concern and extensive monitoring should allow an appropriate investigation of the safety related to the coronary sinus Reducer. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier - NCT01205893.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3599995
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35999952013-03-17 A phase II, sham-controlled, double-blinded study testing the safety and efficacy of the coronary sinus reducer in patients with refractory angina: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial Jolicœur, E Marc Banai, Shmuel Henry, Timothy D Schwartz, Marc Doucet, Serge White, Christopher J Edelman, Elazer Verheye, Stefan Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: A growing population of patients lives with severe coronary artery disease not amenable to coronary revascularization and with refractory angina despite optimal medical therapy. Percutaneous reduction of the coronary sinus is an emerging treatment for myocardial ischemia that increases coronary sinus pressure to promote a transcollateral redistribution of coronary artery in-flow from nonischemic to ischemic subendocardial territories. A first-in-man study has demonstrated that the percutaneous reduction of the coronary sinus can be performed safely in such patients. The COSIRA trial seeks to assess whether a percutaneous reduction of the coronary sinus can improve the symptoms of refractory angina in patients with limited revascularization options. METHODS/DESIGN: The COSIRA trial is a phase II double-blind, sham-controlled, randomized parallel trial comparing the percutaneously implanted coronary sinus Reducer (Neovasc Inc, Richmond, BC, Canada) to a sham implantation in 124 patients enrolled in Canada, Belgium, England, Scotland, Sweden and Denmark. All patients need to have stable Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) class III or IV angina despite optimal medical therapy, with evidence of reversible ischemia related to disease in the left coronary artery, and a left ventricular ejection fraction >25%. Participants experiencing an improvement in their angina ≥2 CCS classes six months after the randomization will meet the primary efficacy endpoint. The secondary objective of this trial is to test whether coronary sinus Reducer implantation will improve left ventricular ischemia, as measured by the improvement in dobutamine echocardiogram wall motion score index and in time to 1 mm ST-segment depression from baseline to six-month post-implantation. DISCUSSION: Based on previous observations, the COSIRA is expected to provide a significant positive result or an informative null result upon which rational development decisions can be based. Patient safety is a central concern and extensive monitoring should allow an appropriate investigation of the safety related to the coronary sinus Reducer. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier - NCT01205893. BioMed Central 2013-02-15 /pmc/articles/PMC3599995/ /pubmed/23413981 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-14-46 Text en Copyright ©2013 Jolicoeur et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Jolicœur, E Marc
Banai, Shmuel
Henry, Timothy D
Schwartz, Marc
Doucet, Serge
White, Christopher J
Edelman, Elazer
Verheye, Stefan
A phase II, sham-controlled, double-blinded study testing the safety and efficacy of the coronary sinus reducer in patients with refractory angina: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title A phase II, sham-controlled, double-blinded study testing the safety and efficacy of the coronary sinus reducer in patients with refractory angina: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_full A phase II, sham-controlled, double-blinded study testing the safety and efficacy of the coronary sinus reducer in patients with refractory angina: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr A phase II, sham-controlled, double-blinded study testing the safety and efficacy of the coronary sinus reducer in patients with refractory angina: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed A phase II, sham-controlled, double-blinded study testing the safety and efficacy of the coronary sinus reducer in patients with refractory angina: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_short A phase II, sham-controlled, double-blinded study testing the safety and efficacy of the coronary sinus reducer in patients with refractory angina: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_sort phase ii, sham-controlled, double-blinded study testing the safety and efficacy of the coronary sinus reducer in patients with refractory angina: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3599995/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23413981
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-14-46
work_keys_str_mv AT jolicœuremarc aphaseiishamcontrolleddoubleblindedstudytestingthesafetyandefficacyofthecoronarysinusreducerinpatientswithrefractoryanginastudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT banaishmuel aphaseiishamcontrolleddoubleblindedstudytestingthesafetyandefficacyofthecoronarysinusreducerinpatientswithrefractoryanginastudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT henrytimothyd aphaseiishamcontrolleddoubleblindedstudytestingthesafetyandefficacyofthecoronarysinusreducerinpatientswithrefractoryanginastudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT schwartzmarc aphaseiishamcontrolleddoubleblindedstudytestingthesafetyandefficacyofthecoronarysinusreducerinpatientswithrefractoryanginastudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT doucetserge aphaseiishamcontrolleddoubleblindedstudytestingthesafetyandefficacyofthecoronarysinusreducerinpatientswithrefractoryanginastudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT whitechristopherj aphaseiishamcontrolleddoubleblindedstudytestingthesafetyandefficacyofthecoronarysinusreducerinpatientswithrefractoryanginastudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT edelmanelazer aphaseiishamcontrolleddoubleblindedstudytestingthesafetyandefficacyofthecoronarysinusreducerinpatientswithrefractoryanginastudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT verheyestefan aphaseiishamcontrolleddoubleblindedstudytestingthesafetyandefficacyofthecoronarysinusreducerinpatientswithrefractoryanginastudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT jolicœuremarc phaseiishamcontrolleddoubleblindedstudytestingthesafetyandefficacyofthecoronarysinusreducerinpatientswithrefractoryanginastudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT banaishmuel phaseiishamcontrolleddoubleblindedstudytestingthesafetyandefficacyofthecoronarysinusreducerinpatientswithrefractoryanginastudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT henrytimothyd phaseiishamcontrolleddoubleblindedstudytestingthesafetyandefficacyofthecoronarysinusreducerinpatientswithrefractoryanginastudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT schwartzmarc phaseiishamcontrolleddoubleblindedstudytestingthesafetyandefficacyofthecoronarysinusreducerinpatientswithrefractoryanginastudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT doucetserge phaseiishamcontrolleddoubleblindedstudytestingthesafetyandefficacyofthecoronarysinusreducerinpatientswithrefractoryanginastudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT whitechristopherj phaseiishamcontrolleddoubleblindedstudytestingthesafetyandefficacyofthecoronarysinusreducerinpatientswithrefractoryanginastudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT edelmanelazer phaseiishamcontrolleddoubleblindedstudytestingthesafetyandefficacyofthecoronarysinusreducerinpatientswithrefractoryanginastudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT verheyestefan phaseiishamcontrolleddoubleblindedstudytestingthesafetyandefficacyofthecoronarysinusreducerinpatientswithrefractoryanginastudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial