Cargando…
Total 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Determination by an Entry Level Triple Quadrupole Instrument: Comparison between Two Commercial Kits
Objective. 25-hydroxyvitamin D(2)/D(3) (25-OHD(2)/D(3)) determination is a reliable biomarker for vitamin D status. Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry was recently proposed as a reference method for vitamin D status evaluation. The aim of this work is to compare two commercial kits (Chro...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3600235/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23555079 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/270426 |
_version_ | 1782475611433861120 |
---|---|
author | Gervasoni, Jacopo Cocci, Andrea Zuppi, Cecilia Persichilli, Silvia |
author_facet | Gervasoni, Jacopo Cocci, Andrea Zuppi, Cecilia Persichilli, Silvia |
author_sort | Gervasoni, Jacopo |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective. 25-hydroxyvitamin D(2)/D(3) (25-OHD(2)/D(3)) determination is a reliable biomarker for vitamin D status. Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry was recently proposed as a reference method for vitamin D status evaluation. The aim of this work is to compare two commercial kits (Chromsystems and PerkinElmer) for 25-OHD(2)/D(3) determination by our entry level LC-MS/MS. Design and Methods. Chromsystems kit adds an online trap column to an HPLC column and provides atmospheric pressure chemical ionization, isotopically labeled internal standard, and 4 calibrator points. PerkinElmer kit uses a solvent extraction and protein precipitation method. This kit can be used with or without derivatization with, respectively, electrospray and atmospheric pressure chemical ionization. For each analyte, there are isotopically labeled internal standards and 7 deuterated calibrator points. Results. Performance characteristics are acceptable for both methods. Mean bias between methods calculated on 70 samples was 1.9 ng/mL. Linear regression analysis gave an R (2) of 0.94. 25-OHD(2) is detectable only with PerkinElmer kit in derivatized assay option. Conclusion. Both methods are suitable for routine. Chromsystems kit minimizes manual sample preparation, requiring only protein precipitation, but, with our system, 25-OHD(2) is not detectable. PerkinElmer kit without derivatization does not guarantee acceptable performance with our LC-MS/MS system, as sample is not purified online. Derivatization provides sufficient sensitivity for 25-OHD(2) detection. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3600235 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-36002352013-04-02 Total 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Determination by an Entry Level Triple Quadrupole Instrument: Comparison between Two Commercial Kits Gervasoni, Jacopo Cocci, Andrea Zuppi, Cecilia Persichilli, Silvia Biomed Res Int Methodology Report Objective. 25-hydroxyvitamin D(2)/D(3) (25-OHD(2)/D(3)) determination is a reliable biomarker for vitamin D status. Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry was recently proposed as a reference method for vitamin D status evaluation. The aim of this work is to compare two commercial kits (Chromsystems and PerkinElmer) for 25-OHD(2)/D(3) determination by our entry level LC-MS/MS. Design and Methods. Chromsystems kit adds an online trap column to an HPLC column and provides atmospheric pressure chemical ionization, isotopically labeled internal standard, and 4 calibrator points. PerkinElmer kit uses a solvent extraction and protein precipitation method. This kit can be used with or without derivatization with, respectively, electrospray and atmospheric pressure chemical ionization. For each analyte, there are isotopically labeled internal standards and 7 deuterated calibrator points. Results. Performance characteristics are acceptable for both methods. Mean bias between methods calculated on 70 samples was 1.9 ng/mL. Linear regression analysis gave an R (2) of 0.94. 25-OHD(2) is detectable only with PerkinElmer kit in derivatized assay option. Conclusion. Both methods are suitable for routine. Chromsystems kit minimizes manual sample preparation, requiring only protein precipitation, but, with our system, 25-OHD(2) is not detectable. PerkinElmer kit without derivatization does not guarantee acceptable performance with our LC-MS/MS system, as sample is not purified online. Derivatization provides sufficient sensitivity for 25-OHD(2) detection. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013 2013-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC3600235/ /pubmed/23555079 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/270426 Text en Copyright © 2013 Jacopo Gervasoni et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Methodology Report Gervasoni, Jacopo Cocci, Andrea Zuppi, Cecilia Persichilli, Silvia Total 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Determination by an Entry Level Triple Quadrupole Instrument: Comparison between Two Commercial Kits |
title | Total 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Determination by an Entry Level Triple Quadrupole Instrument: Comparison between Two Commercial Kits |
title_full | Total 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Determination by an Entry Level Triple Quadrupole Instrument: Comparison between Two Commercial Kits |
title_fullStr | Total 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Determination by an Entry Level Triple Quadrupole Instrument: Comparison between Two Commercial Kits |
title_full_unstemmed | Total 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Determination by an Entry Level Triple Quadrupole Instrument: Comparison between Two Commercial Kits |
title_short | Total 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Determination by an Entry Level Triple Quadrupole Instrument: Comparison between Two Commercial Kits |
title_sort | total 25-hydroxyvitamin d determination by an entry level triple quadrupole instrument: comparison between two commercial kits |
topic | Methodology Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3600235/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23555079 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/270426 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gervasonijacopo total25hydroxyvitaminddeterminationbyanentryleveltriplequadrupoleinstrumentcomparisonbetweentwocommercialkits AT cocciandrea total25hydroxyvitaminddeterminationbyanentryleveltriplequadrupoleinstrumentcomparisonbetweentwocommercialkits AT zuppicecilia total25hydroxyvitaminddeterminationbyanentryleveltriplequadrupoleinstrumentcomparisonbetweentwocommercialkits AT persichillisilvia total25hydroxyvitaminddeterminationbyanentryleveltriplequadrupoleinstrumentcomparisonbetweentwocommercialkits |