Cargando…

Total 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Determination by an Entry Level Triple Quadrupole Instrument: Comparison between Two Commercial Kits

Objective. 25-hydroxyvitamin D(2)/D(3) (25-OHD(2)/D(3)) determination is a reliable biomarker for vitamin D status. Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry was recently proposed as a reference method for vitamin D status evaluation. The aim of this work is to compare two commercial kits (Chro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gervasoni, Jacopo, Cocci, Andrea, Zuppi, Cecilia, Persichilli, Silvia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3600235/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23555079
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/270426
_version_ 1782475611433861120
author Gervasoni, Jacopo
Cocci, Andrea
Zuppi, Cecilia
Persichilli, Silvia
author_facet Gervasoni, Jacopo
Cocci, Andrea
Zuppi, Cecilia
Persichilli, Silvia
author_sort Gervasoni, Jacopo
collection PubMed
description Objective. 25-hydroxyvitamin D(2)/D(3) (25-OHD(2)/D(3)) determination is a reliable biomarker for vitamin D status. Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry was recently proposed as a reference method for vitamin D status evaluation. The aim of this work is to compare two commercial kits (Chromsystems and PerkinElmer) for 25-OHD(2)/D(3) determination by our entry level LC-MS/MS. Design and Methods. Chromsystems kit adds an online trap column to an HPLC column and provides atmospheric pressure chemical ionization, isotopically labeled internal standard, and 4 calibrator points. PerkinElmer kit uses a solvent extraction and protein precipitation method. This kit can be used with or without derivatization with, respectively, electrospray and atmospheric pressure chemical ionization. For each analyte, there are isotopically labeled internal standards and 7 deuterated calibrator points. Results. Performance characteristics are acceptable for both methods. Mean bias between methods calculated on 70 samples was 1.9 ng/mL. Linear regression analysis gave an R (2) of 0.94. 25-OHD(2) is detectable only with PerkinElmer kit in derivatized assay option. Conclusion. Both methods are suitable for routine. Chromsystems kit minimizes manual sample preparation, requiring only protein precipitation, but, with our system, 25-OHD(2) is not detectable. PerkinElmer kit without derivatization does not guarantee acceptable performance with our LC-MS/MS system, as sample is not purified online. Derivatization provides sufficient sensitivity for 25-OHD(2) detection.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3600235
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36002352013-04-02 Total 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Determination by an Entry Level Triple Quadrupole Instrument: Comparison between Two Commercial Kits Gervasoni, Jacopo Cocci, Andrea Zuppi, Cecilia Persichilli, Silvia Biomed Res Int Methodology Report Objective. 25-hydroxyvitamin D(2)/D(3) (25-OHD(2)/D(3)) determination is a reliable biomarker for vitamin D status. Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry was recently proposed as a reference method for vitamin D status evaluation. The aim of this work is to compare two commercial kits (Chromsystems and PerkinElmer) for 25-OHD(2)/D(3) determination by our entry level LC-MS/MS. Design and Methods. Chromsystems kit adds an online trap column to an HPLC column and provides atmospheric pressure chemical ionization, isotopically labeled internal standard, and 4 calibrator points. PerkinElmer kit uses a solvent extraction and protein precipitation method. This kit can be used with or without derivatization with, respectively, electrospray and atmospheric pressure chemical ionization. For each analyte, there are isotopically labeled internal standards and 7 deuterated calibrator points. Results. Performance characteristics are acceptable for both methods. Mean bias between methods calculated on 70 samples was 1.9 ng/mL. Linear regression analysis gave an R (2) of 0.94. 25-OHD(2) is detectable only with PerkinElmer kit in derivatized assay option. Conclusion. Both methods are suitable for routine. Chromsystems kit minimizes manual sample preparation, requiring only protein precipitation, but, with our system, 25-OHD(2) is not detectable. PerkinElmer kit without derivatization does not guarantee acceptable performance with our LC-MS/MS system, as sample is not purified online. Derivatization provides sufficient sensitivity for 25-OHD(2) detection. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013 2013-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC3600235/ /pubmed/23555079 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/270426 Text en Copyright © 2013 Jacopo Gervasoni et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Methodology Report
Gervasoni, Jacopo
Cocci, Andrea
Zuppi, Cecilia
Persichilli, Silvia
Total 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Determination by an Entry Level Triple Quadrupole Instrument: Comparison between Two Commercial Kits
title Total 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Determination by an Entry Level Triple Quadrupole Instrument: Comparison between Two Commercial Kits
title_full Total 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Determination by an Entry Level Triple Quadrupole Instrument: Comparison between Two Commercial Kits
title_fullStr Total 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Determination by an Entry Level Triple Quadrupole Instrument: Comparison between Two Commercial Kits
title_full_unstemmed Total 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Determination by an Entry Level Triple Quadrupole Instrument: Comparison between Two Commercial Kits
title_short Total 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Determination by an Entry Level Triple Quadrupole Instrument: Comparison between Two Commercial Kits
title_sort total 25-hydroxyvitamin d determination by an entry level triple quadrupole instrument: comparison between two commercial kits
topic Methodology Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3600235/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23555079
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/270426
work_keys_str_mv AT gervasonijacopo total25hydroxyvitaminddeterminationbyanentryleveltriplequadrupoleinstrumentcomparisonbetweentwocommercialkits
AT cocciandrea total25hydroxyvitaminddeterminationbyanentryleveltriplequadrupoleinstrumentcomparisonbetweentwocommercialkits
AT zuppicecilia total25hydroxyvitaminddeterminationbyanentryleveltriplequadrupoleinstrumentcomparisonbetweentwocommercialkits
AT persichillisilvia total25hydroxyvitaminddeterminationbyanentryleveltriplequadrupoleinstrumentcomparisonbetweentwocommercialkits