Cargando…

Massage Therapy for Neck and Shoulder Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Objective. To evaluate the effectiveness of massage therapy (MT) for neck and shoulder pain. Methods. Seven English and Chinese databases were searched until December 2011 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of MT for neck and shoulder pain. The methodological quality of RCTs was assessed based...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kong, Ling Jun, Zhan, Hong Sheng, Cheng, Ying Wu, Yuan, Wei An, Chen, Bo, Fang, Min
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3600270/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23533504
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/613279
_version_ 1782475619361095680
author Kong, Ling Jun
Zhan, Hong Sheng
Cheng, Ying Wu
Yuan, Wei An
Chen, Bo
Fang, Min
author_facet Kong, Ling Jun
Zhan, Hong Sheng
Cheng, Ying Wu
Yuan, Wei An
Chen, Bo
Fang, Min
author_sort Kong, Ling Jun
collection PubMed
description Objective. To evaluate the effectiveness of massage therapy (MT) for neck and shoulder pain. Methods. Seven English and Chinese databases were searched until December 2011 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of MT for neck and shoulder pain. The methodological quality of RCTs was assessed based on PEDro scale. The meta-analyses of MT for neck and shoulder pain were performed. Results. Twelve high-quality studies were included. In immediate effects, the meta-analyses showed significant effects of MT for neck pain (standardised mean difference, SMD, 1.79; 95% confidence intervals, CI, 1.01 to 2.57; P < 0.00001) and shoulder pain (SMD, 1.50; 95% CI, 0.55 to 2.45; P = 0.002) versus inactive therapies. And MT showed short-term effects for shoulder pain (SMD, 1.51; 95% CI, 0.53 to 2.49; P = 0.003). But MT did not show better effects for neck pain (SMD, 0.13; 95% CI, −0.38 to 0.63; P = 0.63) or shoulder pain (SMD, 0.88; 95% CI, −0.74 to 2.51; P = 0.29) than active therapies. In addition, functional status of the shoulder was not significantly affected by MT. Conclusion. MT may provide immediate effects for neck and shoulder pain. However, MT does not show better effects on pain than other active therapies. No evidence suggests that MT is effective in functional status.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3600270
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36002702013-03-26 Massage Therapy for Neck and Shoulder Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Kong, Ling Jun Zhan, Hong Sheng Cheng, Ying Wu Yuan, Wei An Chen, Bo Fang, Min Evid Based Complement Alternat Med Review Article Objective. To evaluate the effectiveness of massage therapy (MT) for neck and shoulder pain. Methods. Seven English and Chinese databases were searched until December 2011 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of MT for neck and shoulder pain. The methodological quality of RCTs was assessed based on PEDro scale. The meta-analyses of MT for neck and shoulder pain were performed. Results. Twelve high-quality studies were included. In immediate effects, the meta-analyses showed significant effects of MT for neck pain (standardised mean difference, SMD, 1.79; 95% confidence intervals, CI, 1.01 to 2.57; P < 0.00001) and shoulder pain (SMD, 1.50; 95% CI, 0.55 to 2.45; P = 0.002) versus inactive therapies. And MT showed short-term effects for shoulder pain (SMD, 1.51; 95% CI, 0.53 to 2.49; P = 0.003). But MT did not show better effects for neck pain (SMD, 0.13; 95% CI, −0.38 to 0.63; P = 0.63) or shoulder pain (SMD, 0.88; 95% CI, −0.74 to 2.51; P = 0.29) than active therapies. In addition, functional status of the shoulder was not significantly affected by MT. Conclusion. MT may provide immediate effects for neck and shoulder pain. However, MT does not show better effects on pain than other active therapies. No evidence suggests that MT is effective in functional status. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013 2013-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC3600270/ /pubmed/23533504 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/613279 Text en Copyright © 2013 Ling Jun Kong et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Kong, Ling Jun
Zhan, Hong Sheng
Cheng, Ying Wu
Yuan, Wei An
Chen, Bo
Fang, Min
Massage Therapy for Neck and Shoulder Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title Massage Therapy for Neck and Shoulder Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full Massage Therapy for Neck and Shoulder Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Massage Therapy for Neck and Shoulder Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Massage Therapy for Neck and Shoulder Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short Massage Therapy for Neck and Shoulder Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort massage therapy for neck and shoulder pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3600270/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23533504
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/613279
work_keys_str_mv AT konglingjun massagetherapyforneckandshoulderpainasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhanhongsheng massagetherapyforneckandshoulderpainasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT chengyingwu massagetherapyforneckandshoulderpainasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yuanweian massagetherapyforneckandshoulderpainasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT chenbo massagetherapyforneckandshoulderpainasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT fangmin massagetherapyforneckandshoulderpainasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis