Cargando…

Neural Mechanisms of Rapid Sensitivity to Syntactic Anomaly

Recent psycholinguistic models hypothesize that anticipatory processing can speed the response to linguistic input during language comprehension by pre-activating representations necessary for word recognition. We investigated the neurocognitive mechanisms of anticipatory processing by recording eve...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Albert E., Gilley, Phillip M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3600774/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23515395
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00045
_version_ 1782475678214520832
author Kim, Albert E.
Gilley, Phillip M.
author_facet Kim, Albert E.
Gilley, Phillip M.
author_sort Kim, Albert E.
collection PubMed
description Recent psycholinguistic models hypothesize that anticipatory processing can speed the response to linguistic input during language comprehension by pre-activating representations necessary for word recognition. We investigated the neurocognitive mechanisms of anticipatory processing by recording event-related potentials (ERPs) to syntactically anomalous (The thief was caught by for police) and well-formed (e.g., The thief was caught by the police) sentences. One group of participants saw anomalies elicited by the same word in every instance (e.g., for; low-variability stimuli), providing high affordances for predictions about the word-form appearing in the critical position. A second group saw anomalies elicited by seven different prepositions (at, of, on, for, from, over, with; high-variability stimuli) across the study, creating a more difficult prediction task. Syntactic category anomalies enhanced the occipital-temporal N170 component of the ERP, indicating rapid sensitivity – within 200 ms of word-onset – to syntactic anomaly. For low-variability but not the high-variability stimuli, syntactic anomaly also enhanced the earlier occipital-temporal P1 component, around 130 ms after word-onset, indicating that affordances for prediction engendered earlier sensitivity to syntactic anomaly. Independent components analysis revealed three sources within the ERP signal whose functional dynamics were consistent with predictive processing and early responses to syntactic anomaly. Distributed neural source modeling (sLORETA) of these early active sources produced a candidate network for early responses to words during reading in the right posterior occipital, left occipital-temporal, and medial parietal cortex.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3600774
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36007742013-03-19 Neural Mechanisms of Rapid Sensitivity to Syntactic Anomaly Kim, Albert E. Gilley, Phillip M. Front Psychol Psychology Recent psycholinguistic models hypothesize that anticipatory processing can speed the response to linguistic input during language comprehension by pre-activating representations necessary for word recognition. We investigated the neurocognitive mechanisms of anticipatory processing by recording event-related potentials (ERPs) to syntactically anomalous (The thief was caught by for police) and well-formed (e.g., The thief was caught by the police) sentences. One group of participants saw anomalies elicited by the same word in every instance (e.g., for; low-variability stimuli), providing high affordances for predictions about the word-form appearing in the critical position. A second group saw anomalies elicited by seven different prepositions (at, of, on, for, from, over, with; high-variability stimuli) across the study, creating a more difficult prediction task. Syntactic category anomalies enhanced the occipital-temporal N170 component of the ERP, indicating rapid sensitivity – within 200 ms of word-onset – to syntactic anomaly. For low-variability but not the high-variability stimuli, syntactic anomaly also enhanced the earlier occipital-temporal P1 component, around 130 ms after word-onset, indicating that affordances for prediction engendered earlier sensitivity to syntactic anomaly. Independent components analysis revealed three sources within the ERP signal whose functional dynamics were consistent with predictive processing and early responses to syntactic anomaly. Distributed neural source modeling (sLORETA) of these early active sources produced a candidate network for early responses to words during reading in the right posterior occipital, left occipital-temporal, and medial parietal cortex. Frontiers Media S.A. 2013-03-18 /pmc/articles/PMC3600774/ /pubmed/23515395 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00045 Text en Copyright © 2013 Kim and Gilley. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited and subject to any copyright notices concerning any third-party graphics etc.
spellingShingle Psychology
Kim, Albert E.
Gilley, Phillip M.
Neural Mechanisms of Rapid Sensitivity to Syntactic Anomaly
title Neural Mechanisms of Rapid Sensitivity to Syntactic Anomaly
title_full Neural Mechanisms of Rapid Sensitivity to Syntactic Anomaly
title_fullStr Neural Mechanisms of Rapid Sensitivity to Syntactic Anomaly
title_full_unstemmed Neural Mechanisms of Rapid Sensitivity to Syntactic Anomaly
title_short Neural Mechanisms of Rapid Sensitivity to Syntactic Anomaly
title_sort neural mechanisms of rapid sensitivity to syntactic anomaly
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3600774/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23515395
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00045
work_keys_str_mv AT kimalberte neuralmechanismsofrapidsensitivitytosyntacticanomaly
AT gilleyphillipm neuralmechanismsofrapidsensitivitytosyntacticanomaly